Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2004

01-06-2004 | Hepatobiliary–Pancreas

Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic lesions

Authors: Christian Hohl, Thorsten Schmidt, Patrick Haage, Dagmar Honnef, Marcus Blaum, Gundula Staatz, Rolf W. Guenther

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and image quality of conventional B-mode US (BM) and phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging (PTHI) regarding pancreatic pathology. In a prospective study, 107 patients, aged between 28 and 85 years, underwent US examinations of the pancreas with both BM and PTHI in a randomly chosen order. As diagnostic reference, either contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examinations of the upper abdomen were obtained in all patients. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using the Student’s t test. Differences in overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, fluid–solid differentiation, and delineation of the pancreatic tail were analyzed using Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test and Bowker’s symmetry test. Sixteen of 107 examined patients (15%) were non-diagnostic and excluded due to technical limitations such as abdominal gas. A total of 60 pancreatic lesions (cysts, acute pancreatitis, dilatation of the pancreatic duct, calcifications, and solid tumors) were diagnosed by CT or MRI. Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging had a higher sensitivity of 70% (14 of 20) than BM (60%; 24 of 40) for the detection of pancreatic lesions; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.46). In the assessment of lesions <1 cm of size, PTHI had a sensitivity of 70% and BM 46.7%, whereby the difference again was not statistically significant. Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging proved to be superior to BM regarding overall image quality (p<0.0001), lesion conspicuity (p=0.0045), and fluid–solid differentiation (p=0.0002), as well as the delineation of the pancreatic tail (p<0.0001). These differences were statistically significant. The statistically significant improvement of image quality with regards to lesion conspicuity, fluid–solid differentiation, and delineation of the pancreatic tail favors the use of PTHI when evaluating the pancreas with US. Sensitivity for pancreatic lesions is increased with PTHI in comparison with conventional sonography (BM), especially in lesions <1 cm in diameter, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Muir TG, Carstensen EL (1980) Prediction of nonlinear acoustic effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. US Med Biol 6:345–357 Muir TG, Carstensen EL (1980) Prediction of nonlinear acoustic effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. US Med Biol 6:345–357
2.
go back to reference Carstensen EL, Law WK, McKay ND, Muir TG (1980) Demonstration of nonlinear acoustical effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. US Med Biol 6:359–368 Carstensen EL, Law WK, McKay ND, Muir TG (1980) Demonstration of nonlinear acoustical effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. US Med Biol 6:359–368
3.
go back to reference Starritt HC, Perkins MA, Duck FA, Humphrey VF (1985) Evidence for ultrasonic finite-amplitude distortion in muscle using medical equipment. J Acoust Soc Am 77:302–306PubMed Starritt HC, Perkins MA, Duck FA, Humphrey VF (1985) Evidence for ultrasonic finite-amplitude distortion in muscle using medical equipment. J Acoust Soc Am 77:302–306PubMed
4.
go back to reference Starritt HC, Duck FA, Hawkins AJ, Humphrey VF (1986) The development of harmonic distortion in pulsed finite-amplitude US passing through liver. Phys Med Biol 31:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed Starritt HC, Duck FA, Hawkins AJ, Humphrey VF (1986) The development of harmonic distortion in pulsed finite-amplitude US passing through liver. Phys Med Biol 31:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Whittingham TA (1999) Tissue harmonic imaging. Eur Radiol 9:S323–S326PubMed Whittingham TA (1999) Tissue harmonic imaging. Eur Radiol 9:S323–S326PubMed
6.
go back to reference Burns PN, Powers JE, Hope Simpson D, Uhlendorf V, Fritsch T (1996) Harmonic imaging: principles and preliminary results. Angiology 47:63–73 Burns PN, Powers JE, Hope Simpson D, Uhlendorf V, Fritsch T (1996) Harmonic imaging: principles and preliminary results. Angiology 47:63–73
7.
go back to reference Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R (1998) Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. Am J Roentgenol 171:1203–1206 Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R (1998) Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. Am J Roentgenol 171:1203–1206
8.
go back to reference Hann LE, Bach AM, Cramer LD, Siegel D, Yoo HH, Garcia R (1999) Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. Am J Roentgenol 173:201–206 Hann LE, Bach AM, Cramer LD, Siegel D, Yoo HH, Garcia R (1999) Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. Am J Roentgenol 173:201–206
9.
go back to reference Treadwell MC, Seubert DE, Zador I, Goyert GL, Wolfe HM (2000) Benefits associated with harmonic tissue imaging in the obstetric patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1620–1623 Treadwell MC, Seubert DE, Zador I, Goyert GL, Wolfe HM (2000) Benefits associated with harmonic tissue imaging in the obstetric patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1620–1623
10.
go back to reference Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, Tradup DJ, Beck RJ, Koler JM, Groth DS (2000) Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics 20:1127–1135PubMed Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, Tradup DJ, Beck RJ, Koler JM, Groth DS (2000) Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics 20:1127–1135PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mulvagh SL, Foley DA, Belohlavek M, Seward JB (1998) Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization. Mayo Clin Proc 73:1062–1065PubMed Mulvagh SL, Foley DA, Belohlavek M, Seward JB (1998) Image enhancement by noncontrast harmonic echocardiography. Part I. Qualitative assessment of endocardial visualization. Mayo Clin Proc 73:1062–1065PubMed
12.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Oshikawa O, Sasaki T, Ioka T, Tsukuma H (2000) Evaluation of tissue harmonic imaging for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. US Med Biol 26:183–187CrossRef Tanaka S, Oshikawa O, Sasaki T, Ioka T, Tsukuma H (2000) Evaluation of tissue harmonic imaging for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. US Med Biol 26:183–187CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ortega D, Burns PN, Hope-Simpson D, Wilson SR (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging: Is it a benefit for bile duct sonography? Am J Roentgenol 176:653–659 Ortega D, Burns PN, Hope-Simpson D, Wilson SR (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging: Is it a benefit for bile duct sonography? Am J Roentgenol 176:653–659
14.
go back to reference Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Kim KA, Kim EY (2000) Ultrasonographic evaluation of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse inversion harmonic, tissue harmonic, and conventional imaging techniques. J US Med 19:293–299 Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Kim KA, Kim EY (2000) Ultrasonographic evaluation of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse inversion harmonic, tissue harmonic, and conventional imaging techniques. J US Med 19:293–299
15.
go back to reference Stiskal M, Steinbach R, Obholzer G, Frank W, Fischer H, Czembriek H (2000) Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: Is the image quality in abdominal US improved? Rofo 172:1006–1010CrossRef Stiskal M, Steinbach R, Obholzer G, Frank W, Fischer H, Czembriek H (2000) Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: Is the image quality in abdominal US improved? Rofo 172:1006–1010CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosenthal SJ, Jones PH, Wetzel LH (2001) Phase inversion tissue harmonic sonographic imaging: a clinical utility study. Am J Roentgenol 176:1393–1398 Rosenthal SJ, Jones PH, Wetzel LH (2001) Phase inversion tissue harmonic sonographic imaging: a clinical utility study. Am J Roentgenol 176:1393–1398
17.
go back to reference Chapman CS, Lazenby JC (1997) US imaging system employing phase inversion subtraction to enhance the image. US patent 5,632,277 Chapman CS, Lazenby JC (1997) US imaging system employing phase inversion subtraction to enhance the image. US patent 5,632,277
18.
go back to reference Niederau C, Grendell JH (1992) Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Pancreas 7:66–86PubMed Niederau C, Grendell JH (1992) Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Pancreas 7:66–86PubMed
19.
go back to reference Boudghene FP, Deslandes PM, LeBlanche AF, Bigot JMR (1994) US and CT imaging features of intrapancreatic metastasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:905–910PubMed Boudghene FP, Deslandes PM, LeBlanche AF, Bigot JMR (1994) US and CT imaging features of intrapancreatic metastasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:905–910PubMed
20.
go back to reference Reuss J, Rettenmaier G (1993) Transabdominal ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 123:1049–1058PubMed Reuss J, Rettenmaier G (1993) Transabdominal ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 123:1049–1058PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gebel M, Stiehl M, Freise J (1985) Value of sonographic imaging of the pancreatic duct for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer compared with ERCP. Ultraschall Med 6:127–130PubMed Gebel M, Stiehl M, Freise J (1985) Value of sonographic imaging of the pancreatic duct for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer compared with ERCP. Ultraschall Med 6:127–130PubMed
22.
go back to reference Böttger T, Engelmann R, Seifert JK, Löw R, Junginger T (1998) Preoperative diagnostics in pancreatic carcinoma: Would less be better? Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383:243–248 Böttger T, Engelmann R, Seifert JK, Löw R, Junginger T (1998) Preoperative diagnostics in pancreatic carcinoma: Would less be better? Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383:243–248
23.
go back to reference Venu RP, Brown RD, Halline AG (2002) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute and chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 34:560–568CrossRefPubMed Venu RP, Brown RD, Halline AG (2002) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute and chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 34:560–568CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Desser TS, Jeffrey RB (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging techniques: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin US CT MR 22:1–10 Desser TS, Jeffrey RB (2001) Tissue harmonic imaging techniques: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin US CT MR 22:1–10
26.
go back to reference Averkiou MA, Hamilton MF (1997) Nonlinear distortion of short pulses radiated by plane and focused circular pistons. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2539–2548CrossRefPubMed Averkiou MA, Hamilton MF (1997) Nonlinear distortion of short pulses radiated by plane and focused circular pistons. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2539–2548CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Christopher DA, Burns PN, Starkoski BG, Foster FS (1997) A high-frequency pulsed-wave Doppler US system for the detection and imaging of blood flow in the microcirculation. US Med Biol 23:997–1015CrossRef Christopher DA, Burns PN, Starkoski BG, Foster FS (1997) A high-frequency pulsed-wave Doppler US system for the detection and imaging of blood flow in the microcirculation. US Med Biol 23:997–1015CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ward B, Baker AC, Humphrey VF (1997) Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical US. J Acoust Soc Am 101:143–154PubMed Ward B, Baker AC, Humphrey VF (1997) Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical US. J Acoust Soc Am 101:143–154PubMed
29.
Metadata
Title
Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic lesions
Authors
Christian Hohl
Thorsten Schmidt
Patrick Haage
Dagmar Honnef
Marcus Blaum
Gundula Staatz
Rolf W. Guenther
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2191-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

European Radiology 6/2004 Go to the issue