Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors | Original Article

Changes in skeletal muscle area and lean body mass during pazopanib vs sunitinib therapy for metastatic renal cancer

Authors: Osman Köstek, Erdem Yılmaz, Muhammet Bekir Hacıoğlu, Nazım Can Demircan, Ali Gökyer, Sernaz Uzunoğlu, Nermin Tunçbilek, İrfan Çiçin, Bülent Erdoğan

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether sunitinib and pazopanib treatments are associated with change in skeletal muscle area (SMA) and total lean body mass (LBM) as well as to compare their efficacies and safety profiles in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC).

Methods

Thirty-six patients treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor were included. Eighteen of them received sunitinib and the rest/remaining received pazopanib in the first line of mRCC treatment. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography studies of the patients were performed to measure cross-sectional areas (cm2) of muscle tissues.

Results

About 69% of patients were male and median age was 60 (49–68) years. Median time interval between two CT imagings was 6.1 (3.1–7.7) months and it was similar between the two groups (for sunitinib, 4.9 (2.5–6.9) months vs for pazopanib, 7.3 (3.2–9.5) months, p = 0.16, respectively). Disease control rate was 77.7% in all patients. Of these, 66.6% in sunitinib group was consisted of four partial responses and eight stable diseases. In addition, 88.8% in pazopanib group was consisted of three partial responses and 13 stable diseases. A significant decrease in SMA and LBM was observed after sunitinib therapy, whereas SMA and LBM values of pazopanib group did not change significantly (p = 0.02 and p = 0.70, respectively). No significant differences were observed between patients with sunitinib, and pazopanib group median PFS [11.9 (95% CI 6.1–17.6) vs 8.1 months (95% CI 7.2–9.1), respectively; p = 0.28] and median OS [28.6 (95% CI 24.3–32.9) vs 25.5 months (95% CI 18.9–52.7), respectively; p = 0.42]. Dose-limiting toxicities were significantly more frequent in sunitinib group than in pazopanib group (66.7% vs 22.2%, p = 0.02, respectively).

Conclusions

Loss of SMA and LBM with sunitinib was more substantial than with pazopanib. Treatment efficacies of both drugs were similar, but dose-limiting toxicity was more frequent in sunitinib group. Loss of SMA had no significant association with prognosis. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible association between SMA and prognosis in mRCC patients who receive sunitinib or pazopanib.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ (2000) Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 89(3):604–614CrossRefPubMed Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ (2000) Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 89(3):604–614CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary C, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A (2017) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda (Based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017) Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary C, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A (2017) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda (Based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017)
4.
go back to reference Chang SF, Lin PL (2016) Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the association of sarcopenia with mortality. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 13(2):153–162CrossRefPubMed Chang SF, Lin PL (2016) Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the association of sarcopenia with mortality. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 13(2):153–162CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE (2008) A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33(5):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1139/h08-075 CrossRefPubMed Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE (2008) A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33(5):997–1006. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1139/​h08-075 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sun L, Liang C, Shirazian S, Zhou Y, Miller T, Cui J, Fukuda JY, Chu JY, Nematalla A, Wang X, Chen H, Sistla A, Luu TC, Tang F, Wei J, Tang C (2003) Discovery of 5-[5-fluoro-2-oxo-1,2- dihydroindol-(3Z)-ylidenemethyl]-2,4- dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid (2-diethylaminoethyl)amide, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. J Med Chem 46(7):1116–1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0204183 CrossRefPubMed Sun L, Liang C, Shirazian S, Zhou Y, Miller T, Cui J, Fukuda JY, Chu JY, Nematalla A, Wang X, Chen H, Sistla A, Luu TC, Tang F, Wei J, Tang C (2003) Discovery of 5-[5-fluoro-2-oxo-1,2- dihydroindol-(3Z)-ylidenemethyl]-2,4- dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid (2-diethylaminoethyl)amide, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. J Med Chem 46(7):1116–1119. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1021/​jm0204183 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, Louie SG, Christensen JG, Li G, Schreck RE, Abrams TJ, Ngai TJ, Lee LB (2003) In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res 9(1):327–337PubMed Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, Louie SG, Christensen JG, Li G, Schreck RE, Abrams TJ, Ngai TJ, Lee LB (2003) In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res 9(1):327–337PubMed
16.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG, Hudes GR, Wilding G, Figlin RA, Ginsberg MS, Kim ST, Baum CM, DePrimo SE (2006) Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin oncol 24(1):16–24CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG, Hudes GR, Wilding G, Figlin RA, Ginsberg MS, Kim ST, Baum CM, DePrimo SE (2006) Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin oncol 24(1):16–24CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM, Curti BD, George DJ, Hudes GR, Redman BG, Margolin KA, Merchan JR, Wilding G (2006) Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA 295(21):2516–2524CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM, Curti BD, George DJ, Hudes GR, Redman BG, Margolin KA, Merchan JR, Wilding G (2006) Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA 295(21):2516–2524CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369(8):722–731. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1303989 CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369(8):722–731. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1303989 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rousseau B, Kempf E, Desamericq G, Boissier E, Chaubet-Houdu M, Joly C, Saldana C, Boussion H, Neuzillet C, Macquin-Mavier I (2016) First-line antiangiogenics for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 107:44–53CrossRefPubMed Rousseau B, Kempf E, Desamericq G, Boissier E, Chaubet-Houdu M, Joly C, Saldana C, Boussion H, Neuzillet C, Macquin-Mavier I (2016) First-line antiangiogenics for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 107:44–53CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Negrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D (2014) Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study. J Clin Oncol 32(14):1412–1418. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.50.8267 CrossRefPubMed Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Negrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D (2014) Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study. J Clin Oncol 32(14):1412–1418. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2013.​50.​8267 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kim JH, Park I, Lee JL (2016) Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(2):325–332CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Park I, Lee JL (2016) Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(2):325–332CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference MacLean E, Mardekian J, Cisar LA, Hoang CJ, Harnett J (2016) Real-world treatment patterns and costs for patients with renal cell carcinoma initiating treatment with sunitinib and pazopanib. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 22(8):979–990PubMed MacLean E, Mardekian J, Cisar LA, Hoang CJ, Harnett J (2016) Real-world treatment patterns and costs for patients with renal cell carcinoma initiating treatment with sunitinib and pazopanib. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 22(8):979–990PubMed
26.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, McCann L, Deen K, Choueiri TK (2014) Overall survival in renal-cell carcinoma with pazopanib versus sunitinib. N Engl J Med 370(18):1769–1770CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, McCann L, Deen K, Choueiri TK (2014) Overall survival in renal-cell carcinoma with pazopanib versus sunitinib. N Engl J Med 370(18):1769–1770CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fernandez-Pello S, Hofmann F, Tahbaz R, Marconi L, Lam TB, Albiges L, Bensalah K, Canfield SE, Dabestani S, Giles RH, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Powles T, Staehler M, Volpe A, Ljungberg B, Bex A (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of different systemic treatments for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 71(3):426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.020 CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Pello S, Hofmann F, Tahbaz R, Marconi L, Lam TB, Albiges L, Bensalah K, Canfield SE, Dabestani S, Giles RH, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Powles T, Staehler M, Volpe A, Ljungberg B, Bex A (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of different systemic treatments for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 71(3):426–436. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2016.​11.​020 CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Fanzani A, Conraads VM, Penna F, Martinet W (2012) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy: an update. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 3(3):163–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fanzani A, Conraads VM, Penna F, Martinet W (2012) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy: an update. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 3(3):163–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Tran HT, Liu Y, Zurita AJ, Lin Y, Baker-Neblett KL, Martin AM, Figlin RA, Hutson TE, Sternberg CN, Amado RG, Pandite LN, Heymach JV (2012) Prognostic or predictive plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors for patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic renal-cell cancer: a retrospective analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 13(8):827–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70241-3 CrossRefPubMed Tran HT, Liu Y, Zurita AJ, Lin Y, Baker-Neblett KL, Martin AM, Figlin RA, Hutson TE, Sternberg CN, Amado RG, Pandite LN, Heymach JV (2012) Prognostic or predictive plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors for patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic renal-cell cancer: a retrospective analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 13(8):827–837. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(12)70241-3 CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Carmichael C, Yuh BE, Sun V, Lau C, Hsu J, Saikia J, Liu X, Wilson T, Ferrell B, Pal SK (2013) Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: assessment of long-term survivors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11(2):149–154CrossRefPubMed Carmichael C, Yuh BE, Sun V, Lau C, Hsu J, Saikia J, Liu X, Wilson T, Ferrell B, Pal SK (2013) Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: assessment of long-term survivors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11(2):149–154CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Changes in skeletal muscle area and lean body mass during pazopanib vs sunitinib therapy for metastatic renal cancer
Authors
Osman Köstek
Erdem Yılmaz
Muhammet Bekir Hacıoğlu
Nazım Can Demircan
Ali Gökyer
Sernaz Uzunoğlu
Nermin Tunçbilek
İrfan Çiçin
Bülent Erdoğan
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03779-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine