Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

The pH-altering agent omeprazole affects rate but not the extent of ibrutinib exposure

Authors: Jan de Jong, Nahor Haddish-Berhane, Peter Hellemans, James Jiao, Juthamas Sukbuntherng, Daniele Ouellet

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This drug-interaction study evaluated the effect of omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on ibrutinib’s pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy participants.

Methods

This open-label, sequential-design study included 20 healthy adults aged 18–55 years. Ibrutinib (560 mg, single dose) was administered after an overnight fast alone on day 1 and with omeprazole on day 7. Omeprazole (40 mg) alone was administered on days 3–6, 1 h before breakfast; and after an overnight fast on day 7, followed by ibrutinib 2 h later. Blood was sampled on days 1 and 7 for up to 48 h postdose, and the standard PK parameters for ibrutinib and PCI-45227 were summarized using descriptive statistics. The effect of omeprazole on ibrutinib’s PK was determined by assessing geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs. Mechanistic modeling was performed using the BTK-receptor occupancy (RO) model.

Results

AUC48h and AUClast of ibrutinib plus omeprazole versus ibrutinib alone showed a modest decrease (GMR [90% CI] 98.3% [83.1–116.3] and 92.5% [77.8–109.9], respectively); Cmax decreased by 62.5% (GMR [90% CI] 37.5% [26.4–53.4]), with delayed tmax (1−2 h) and terminal half-life unaffected. Mean AUC for PCI-45227 (primary metabolite) was ~ 20% lower with ibrutinib plus omeprazole versus ibrutinib alone. Model predictions showed no impact of decreased Cmax on BTK target engagement. No new safety signals were identified with the use of ibrutinib in this study.

Conclusions

The decrease in Cmax without a corresponding decrease in AUC by omeprazole was not clinically relevant for ibrutinib’s bioavailability. No dose adjustments are recommended during ibrutinib’s co-administration with omeprazole or other pH-altering agents.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Claro RA, McGinn KM, Verdun N, Lee S-L, Chiu H-J, Saber H, Brower ME, Chang CG, Pfuma E, Habtemariam B (2015) FDA approval: ibrutinib for patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma and previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 21(16):3586–3590CrossRefPubMed de Claro RA, McGinn KM, Verdun N, Lee S-L, Chiu H-J, Saber H, Brower ME, Chang CG, Pfuma E, Habtemariam B (2015) FDA approval: ibrutinib for patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma and previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 21(16):3586–3590CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Roskoski R Jr (2016) Ibrutinib inhibition of Bruton protein-tyrosine kinase (BTK) in the treatment of B cell neoplasms. Pharmacol Res 113:395–408CrossRefPubMed Roskoski R Jr (2016) Ibrutinib inhibition of Bruton protein-tyrosine kinase (BTK) in the treatment of B cell neoplasms. Pharmacol Res 113:395–408CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, Ghia P, Bairey O, Hillmen P, Bartlett NL, Li J (2015) Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 373(25):2425–2437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, Ghia P, Bairey O, Hillmen P, Bartlett NL, Li J (2015) Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 373(25):2425–2437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Byrd J, Brown J, O’Brien S, Barrientos J, Kay N, Reddy N, Coutre S, Tam C, Mulligan S, Jaeger U, Investigators R (2014) Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 371(3):213–223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Byrd J, Brown J, O’Brien S, Barrientos J, Kay N, Reddy N, Coutre S, Tam C, Mulligan S, Jaeger U, Investigators R (2014) Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 371(3):213–223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chanan-Khan A, Cramer P, Demirkan F, Fraser G, Silva RS, Grosicki S, Pristupa A, Janssens A, Mayer J, Bartlett NL (2016) Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 17(2):200–211CrossRefPubMed Chanan-Khan A, Cramer P, Demirkan F, Fraser G, Silva RS, Grosicki S, Pristupa A, Janssens A, Mayer J, Bartlett NL (2016) Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 17(2):200–211CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dreyling M, Jurczak W, Jerkeman M, Silva RS, Rusconi C, Trneny M, Offner F, Caballero D, Joao C, Witzens-Harig M (2016) Ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 387(10020):770–778CrossRefPubMed Dreyling M, Jurczak W, Jerkeman M, Silva RS, Rusconi C, Trneny M, Offner F, Caballero D, Joao C, Witzens-Harig M (2016) Ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 387(10020):770–778CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dimopoulos MA, Trotman J, Tedeschi A, Matous JV, Macdonald D, Tam C, Tournilhac O, Ma S, Oriol A, Heffner LT (2017) Ibrutinib for patients with rituximab-refractory Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia (iNNOVATE): an open-label substudy of an international, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(2):241–250CrossRefPubMed Dimopoulos MA, Trotman J, Tedeschi A, Matous JV, Macdonald D, Tam C, Tournilhac O, Ma S, Oriol A, Heffner LT (2017) Ibrutinib for patients with rituximab-refractory Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia (iNNOVATE): an open-label substudy of an international, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(2):241–250CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Noy A, De Vos S, Thieblemont C, Martin P, Flowers CR, Morschhauser F, Collins GP, Ma S, Coleman M, Peles S (2017) Targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase with ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma. Blood 129(16):2224–2232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noy A, De Vos S, Thieblemont C, Martin P, Flowers CR, Morschhauser F, Collins GP, Ma S, Coleman M, Peles S (2017) Targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase with ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma. Blood 129(16):2224–2232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Parmar S, Patel K, Pinilla-Ibarz J (2014) Ibrutinib (imbruvica): a novel targeted therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Pharm Ther 39(7):483 Parmar S, Patel K, Pinilla-Ibarz J (2014) Ibrutinib (imbruvica): a novel targeted therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Pharm Ther 39(7):483
11.
go back to reference Budha N, Frymoyer A, Smelick G, Jin J, Yago M, Dresser M, Holden S, Benet L, Ware J (2012) Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: is pH-dependent solubility the achilles heel of targeted therapy? Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(2):203–213CrossRefPubMed Budha N, Frymoyer A, Smelick G, Jin J, Yago M, Dresser M, Holden S, Benet L, Ware J (2012) Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: is pH-dependent solubility the achilles heel of targeted therapy? Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(2):203–213CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference de Zwart L, Snoeys J, De Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Mannaert E, Monshouwer M (2016) Ibrutinib dosing strategies based on interaction potential of CYP3A4 perpetrators using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 100(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed de Zwart L, Snoeys J, De Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Mannaert E, Monshouwer M (2016) Ibrutinib dosing strategies based on interaction potential of CYP3A4 perpetrators using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 100(5):548–557CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Marostica E, Sukbuntherng J, Loury D, de Jong J, Woot de Trixhe X, Vermeulen A, De Nicolao G, O’Brien S, Byrd JC, Advani R (2015) Population pharmacokinetic model of ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with B cell malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(1):111–121CrossRefPubMed Marostica E, Sukbuntherng J, Loury D, de Jong J, Woot de Trixhe X, Vermeulen A, De Nicolao G, O’Brien S, Byrd JC, Advani R (2015) Population pharmacokinetic model of ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with B cell malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(1):111–121CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Smelick GS, Heffron TP, Chu L, Dean B, West DA, DuVall SL, Lum BL, Budha N, Holden SN, Benet LZ (2013) Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug–drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development. Mol Pharm 10(11):4055–4062CrossRefPubMed Smelick GS, Heffron TP, Chu L, Dean B, West DA, DuVall SL, Lum BL, Budha N, Holden SN, Benet LZ (2013) Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug–drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development. Mol Pharm 10(11):4055–4062CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhang L, Wu F, Lee S, Zhao H (2014) pH-dependent drug–drug interactions for weak base drugs: potential implications for new drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 96(2):266–277CrossRefPubMed Zhang L, Wu F, Lee S, Zhao H (2014) pH-dependent drug–drug interactions for weak base drugs: potential implications for new drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 96(2):266–277CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference de Vries R, Huang M, Bode N, Jejurkar P, de Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Sips L, Weng N, Timmerman P, Verhaeghe T (2015) Bioanalysis of ibrutinib and its active metabolite in human plasma: selectivity issue, impact assessment and resolution. Bioanalysis 7(20):2713–2724CrossRefPubMed de Vries R, Huang M, Bode N, Jejurkar P, de Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Sips L, Weng N, Timmerman P, Verhaeghe T (2015) Bioanalysis of ibrutinib and its active metabolite in human plasma: selectivity issue, impact assessment and resolution. Bioanalysis 7(20):2713–2724CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Evans EK, Tester R, Aslanian S, Karp R, Sheets M, Labenski MT, Witowski SR, Lounsbury H, Chaturvedi P, Mazdiyasni H, Zhu Z (2013) Inhibition of Btk with CC-292 provides early pharmacodynamic assessment of activity in mice and humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 346(2):219–228CrossRefPubMed Evans EK, Tester R, Aslanian S, Karp R, Sheets M, Labenski MT, Witowski SR, Lounsbury H, Chaturvedi P, Mazdiyasni H, Zhu Z (2013) Inhibition of Btk with CC-292 provides early pharmacodynamic assessment of activity in mice and humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 346(2):219–228CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hutchinson CV, Dyer MJ (2014) Breaking good: the inexorable rise of BTK inhibitors in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 166(1):12–22CrossRefPubMed Hutchinson CV, Dyer MJ (2014) Breaking good: the inexorable rise of BTK inhibitors in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 166(1):12–22CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference De Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Skee D, Murphy J, O’Brien S, Byrd JC, James D, Hellemans P, Loury DJ, Jiao J (2015) The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral ibrutinib in healthy participants and patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(5):907–916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Jong J, Sukbuntherng J, Skee D, Murphy J, O’Brien S, Byrd JC, James D, Hellemans P, Loury DJ, Jiao J (2015) The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral ibrutinib in healthy participants and patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(5):907–916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Cederberg C, Andersson T, Skånberg I (1989) Omeprazole: pharmacokinetics and metabolism in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 24(Suppl 166):33–40CrossRef Cederberg C, Andersson T, Skånberg I (1989) Omeprazole: pharmacokinetics and metabolism in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 24(Suppl 166):33–40CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jusko WJ (1971) Pharmacodynamics of chemotherapeutic effects: dose-time-response relationships for phase-nonspecific agents. J Pharm Sci 60(6):892–895CrossRefPubMed Jusko WJ (1971) Pharmacodynamics of chemotherapeutic effects: dose-time-response relationships for phase-nonspecific agents. J Pharm Sci 60(6):892–895CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Narasimhan NI, Dorer DJ, Davis J, Turner CD, Sonnichsen D (2014) Evaluation of the effect of multiple doses of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of ponatinib in healthy subjects. Clin Drug Invest 34(10):723–729CrossRef Narasimhan NI, Dorer DJ, Davis J, Turner CD, Sonnichsen D (2014) Evaluation of the effect of multiple doses of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of ponatinib in healthy subjects. Clin Drug Invest 34(10):723–729CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Eley T, Luo FR, Agrawal S, Sanil A, Manning J, Li T, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Bertz R (2009) Phase I study of the effect of gastric acid pH modulators on the bioavailability of oral dasatinib in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 49(6):700–709CrossRefPubMed Eley T, Luo FR, Agrawal S, Sanil A, Manning J, Li T, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Bertz R (2009) Phase I study of the effect of gastric acid pH modulators on the bioavailability of oral dasatinib in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 49(6):700–709CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS, Abt M, Hamilton M, Lum BL (2015) Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anti-Cancer Drugs 26(5):565–572CrossRefPubMed Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS, Abt M, Hamilton M, Lum BL (2015) Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anti-Cancer Drugs 26(5):565–572CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yin OQ, Gallagher N, Fischer D, Demirhan E, Zhou W, Golor G, Schran H (2010) Effect of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole on the oral absorption and pharmacokinetics of nilotinib. J Clin Pharmacol 50(8):960–967CrossRefPubMed Yin OQ, Gallagher N, Fischer D, Demirhan E, Zhou W, Golor G, Schran H (2010) Effect of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole on the oral absorption and pharmacokinetics of nilotinib. J Clin Pharmacol 50(8):960–967CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Koch KM, Im YH, Kim SB, Urruticoechea Ribate A, Stephenson J, Botbyl J, Cartee L, Holshouser J, Ridgway D (2013) Effects of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of lapatinib in breast cancer patients. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2(4):336–341CrossRefPubMed Koch KM, Im YH, Kim SB, Urruticoechea Ribate A, Stephenson J, Botbyl J, Cartee L, Holshouser J, Ridgway D (2013) Effects of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of lapatinib in breast cancer patients. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2(4):336–341CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tan AR, Gibbon DG, Stein MN, Lindquist D, Edenfield JW, Martin JC, Gregory C, Suttle AB, Tada H, Botbyl J (2013) Effects of ketoconazole and esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71(6):1635–1643CrossRefPubMed Tan AR, Gibbon DG, Stein MN, Lindquist D, Edenfield JW, Martin JC, Gregory C, Suttle AB, Tada H, Botbyl J (2013) Effects of ketoconazole and esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71(6):1635–1643CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yu G, Zheng Q-S, Wang D-X, Zhou H-H, Li G-F (2014) Drug interactions between tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and acid suppressive agents: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 15(11):e469-e470CrossRef Yu G, Zheng Q-S, Wang D-X, Zhou H-H, Li G-F (2014) Drug interactions between tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and acid suppressive agents: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 15(11):e469-e470CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lu T, Fraczkiewicz G, Salphati L, Budha N, Dalziel G, Smelick GS, Morrissey KM, Davis JD, Jin JY, Ware JA (2017) Combining “bottom-up” and “top-down” approaches to assess the impact of food and gastric pH on pictilisib (GDC-0941) pharmacokinetics. CPT: Pharm Syst Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12228 CrossRef Lu T, Fraczkiewicz G, Salphati L, Budha N, Dalziel G, Smelick GS, Morrissey KM, Davis JD, Jin JY, Ware JA (2017) Combining “bottom-up” and “top-down” approaches to assess the impact of food and gastric pH on pictilisib (GDC-0941) pharmacokinetics. CPT: Pharm Syst Pharmacol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​psp4.​12228 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The pH-altering agent omeprazole affects rate but not the extent of ibrutinib exposure
Authors
Jan de Jong
Nahor Haddish-Berhane
Peter Hellemans
James Jiao
Juthamas Sukbuntherng
Daniele Ouellet
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3613-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine