Published in:
Open Access
01-11-2016 | Original Article
A phase II trial of small-dose bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (sVRD) as consolidation/maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma
Authors:
Soushi Ibata, Tsutomu Sato, Hiroyuki Kuroda, Yasuhiro Nagamachi, Satoshi Iyama, Akihito Fujimi, Yusuke Kamihara, Yuichi Konuma, Masahiro Yoshida, Ayumi Tatekoshi, Akari Hashimoto, Hiroto Horiguchi, Kaoru Ono, Kazuyuki Murase, Kohichi Takada, Koji Miyanishi, Masayoshi Kobune, Yasuo Hirayama, Junji Kato
Published in:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
|
Issue 5/2016
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Consolidation/maintenance therapy induces deep remission in patients with multiple myeloma (MM); however, the most suitable regimen has been under investigation. The combination therapy with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is a powerful regimen for relapsed/refractory as well as newly diagnosed MM as an induction therapy. However, severe adverse events (AEs) may become a problem when VRD is introduced without dose reduction as a consolidation/maintenance therapy.
Methods
In this single-arm phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy of small-dose VRD regimen (sVRD) in the consolidation/maintenance setting. Sixteen patients who had partial response (PR) or better after any induction therapy were enrolled. Patients received at least six 28-day cycles of subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15), lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1–21) and dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22).
Results
The overall response rate and the complete response (CR) rate were 100 and 43.8 %, respectively. In particular, one patient with CR and two patients with very good PR at enrollment achieved stringent CR during 6 courses of sVRD. With a median follow-up time of 29.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, while the PFS and OS rates at 2.5 years were 66.6 and 77.3 %, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that disease progression as a reason for discontinuation of sVRD had a negative impact on OS. There were no grade 3 or 4 hematologic or nonhematologic AEs.
Conclusion
Our sVRD regimen as a consolidation/maintenance therapy was highly effective and well tolerable.