Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2013

Open Access 01-02-2013 | Original Article

Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer

Authors: G. P. Stathopoulos, D. Trafalis, J. Dimitroulis, Ch. Kosmas, J. Stathopoulos, D. Tsavdaridis

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The established treatment for small-cell lung cancer has been a cisplatin–etoposide combination, as the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide but this has been unacceptable due to the toxicity. This toxicity could be attributed to the three consequent days of treatment with etoposide plus the doses of each of the three drugs. Our objectives were to determine an equal or longer survival and lower toxicity by administering all 3 drugs with low dosage on day one, compared to the established guideline of 3-day administration.

Methods

We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m2, etoposide 120 mg/m2 (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2. The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.

Results

The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6–16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity.

Conclusion

The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin–etoposide–paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Loehrer P, Einhorn L, Greco FA (1988) Cisplatin plus etoposide in small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 15:2–8PubMed Loehrer P, Einhorn L, Greco FA (1988) Cisplatin plus etoposide in small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 15:2–8PubMed
2.
go back to reference Skarlos DV, Samantas E, Kosmidis P et al (1994) Randomised comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 5:601–607PubMed Skarlos DV, Samantas E, Kosmidis P et al (1994) Randomised comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 5:601–607PubMed
3.
go back to reference Jett JR, Everson L, Therneau TM et al (1990) Treatment of limited stage small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine with or without etoposide: a randomised trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 18:33–39 Jett JR, Everson L, Therneau TM et al (1990) Treatment of limited stage small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine with or without etoposide: a randomised trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 18:33–39
4.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS et al (2002) Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy of extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomised study (E1588). Lung Cancer 37:311–317PubMedCrossRef Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Ritch PS et al (2002) Study of either ifosfamide or teniposide compared to a standard chemotherapy of extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomised study (E1588). Lung Cancer 37:311–317PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lowenbraun S, Birch R, Buchanan R et al (1984) Combination chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer carcinoma: a randomised study of two intensive regimens. Cancer 54:2344–2345PubMedCrossRef Lowenbraun S, Birch R, Buchanan R et al (1984) Combination chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer carcinoma: a randomised study of two intensive regimens. Cancer 54:2344–2345PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Birch R et al (1987) A randomised comparison of high-dose versus conventional-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 5:1731–1738PubMed Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Birch R et al (1987) A randomised comparison of high-dose versus conventional-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 5:1731–1738PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N et al (1991) Randomised trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:855–861PubMedCrossRef Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N et al (1991) Randomised trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:855–861PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Sarma RP et al (1995) Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 13:1430–1435PubMed Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Sarma RP et al (1995) Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 13:1430–1435PubMed
9.
go back to reference Loehrer PJ, Rynard S, Ausari R et al (1992) Etoposide ifosfamide and cisplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer. Cancer 69:669–673PubMedCrossRef Loehrer PJ, Rynard S, Ausari R et al (1992) Etoposide ifosfamide and cisplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer. Cancer 69:669–673PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Clark PI, Slevin ML, Joel SP et al (1994) A randomised trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer; the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 12:1427–1435PubMed Clark PI, Slevin ML, Joel SP et al (1994) A randomised trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer; the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 12:1427–1435PubMed
12.
go back to reference Moore TD, Korn EL (1992) Phase II trial design considerations for small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:150–158PubMedCrossRef Moore TD, Korn EL (1992) Phase II trial design considerations for small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:150–158PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Giaccone G, Ferrari P, Donadio M et al (1987) Reinduction chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:1697–1703PubMedCrossRef Giaccone G, Ferrari P, Donadio M et al (1987) Reinduction chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:1697–1703PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sundstrom S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S et al (2002) Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer. Results from a randomised Phase III trial with five years’ follow up. J Clin Oncol 20:4665–4672PubMedCrossRef Sundstrom S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S et al (2002) Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer. Results from a randomised Phase III trial with five years’ follow up. J Clin Oncol 20:4665–4672PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH et al (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282–291PubMed Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH et al (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282–291PubMed
16.
go back to reference Einhorn LH, Crawford J, Birch R et al (1988) Cisplatin plus etoposide consolidation following cyclopphosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine in limited small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 6:451–456PubMed Einhorn LH, Crawford J, Birch R et al (1988) Cisplatin plus etoposide consolidation following cyclopphosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine in limited small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 6:451–456PubMed
17.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Loeher PJ, Ansari R, Gonin R et al (1995) Cisplatin plus etoposide with or without ifosfamide in extensive small cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 13:2594–2599 Loeher PJ, Ansari R, Gonin R et al (1995) Cisplatin plus etoposide with or without ifosfamide in extensive small cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 13:2594–2599
19.
go back to reference Spiro SG, Souhami RL, Geddes DM et al (1989) Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial. Br J Cancer 59(4):578–583PubMedCrossRef Spiro SG, Souhami RL, Geddes DM et al (1989) Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial. Br J Cancer 59(4):578–583PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bleehen NM, Girling DJ, Machin D et al (1993) A randomised trial of three to six courses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) I: survival and prognostic factors. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Br J Cancer 68(6):1150–1156PubMedCrossRef Bleehen NM, Girling DJ, Machin D et al (1993) A randomised trial of three to six courses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) I: survival and prognostic factors. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Br J Cancer 68(6):1150–1156PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Giaccone G, Dalesio O, McVie GJ et al (1993) Maintenance chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: long term results of a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 11(7):1230–1240PubMed Giaccone G, Dalesio O, McVie GJ et al (1993) Maintenance chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: long term results of a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 11(7):1230–1240PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Bureau G et al (1996) Randomized trial comparing induction chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 14(8):2337–2344PubMed Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Bureau G et al (1996) Randomized trial comparing induction chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 14(8):2337–2344PubMed
23.
go back to reference Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P et al (2000) Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity or chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council. Multicenter randomized trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 18(2):395–404PubMed Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P et al (2000) Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity or chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council. Multicenter randomized trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 18(2):395–404PubMed
24.
go back to reference Pujol JL, Douillard JY, Rivière A et al (1997) Dose-intensity of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen with or without recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1997 in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol 15(5):2082–2089PubMed Pujol JL, Douillard JY, Rivière A et al (1997) Dose-intensity of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen with or without recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1997 in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol 15(5):2082–2089PubMed
25.
go back to reference Mavroudis D, Papadakis E, Veslemes V et al (2001) A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 12:463–470PubMedCrossRef Mavroudis D, Papadakis E, Veslemes V et al (2001) A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 12:463–470PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bunn PA, Kelly K (1997) A Phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 24(suppl. 12):144–148 Bunn PA, Kelly K (1997) A Phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 24(suppl. 12):144–148
27.
go back to reference Dimitroulis J, Rapti A, Stathopoulos GP et al (2008) Comparison of cisplatin-paclitaxel-etoposide combination versus cisplatin-etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer. A Phase III study. Oncol Rep 20:879–884PubMed Dimitroulis J, Rapti A, Stathopoulos GP et al (2008) Comparison of cisplatin-paclitaxel-etoposide combination versus cisplatin-etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer. A Phase III study. Oncol Rep 20:879–884PubMed
Metadata
Title
Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer
Authors
G. P. Stathopoulos
D. Trafalis
J. Dimitroulis
Ch. Kosmas
J. Stathopoulos
D. Tsavdaridis
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-2022-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine