Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Phase I dose-finding study and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the neutropenic response of intravenous diflomotecan in patients with advanced malignant tumours

Authors: Iñaki F. Trocòniz, María J. Garrido, Cristina Segura, Josep-María Cendrós, Paola Principe, Concepción Peraire, Rosendo Obach

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous (iv) diflomotecan administered once every 3 weeks, and to characterize the relationship between pharmacokinetics and neutropenic effect, using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Experimental design: Twenty-four patients received a total of 75 cycles of iv diflomotecan that was administered as 20-min infusion, once every 3 weeks at escalating doses of 2, 4, 5, and 6 mg/m2. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of diflomotecan were measured after the first drug administration. Results: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) following the first cycle occurred in 12 patients and a total of 16 patients experienced DLT at some point in the trial. During the first cycle of treatment the number of patients in the 5 and 6 mg/m2 dose groups that experienced DLT was 3 of 4, and 3 of 3, respectively. Therefore, the dose of 5 mg/m2 was considered the MTD and the dose of 4 mg/m2 the recommended dose (RD). During the first cycle, 12 patients experienced DLT, six had either infection of haematological toxicity and eight complained of fatigue. The best response was a partial response in one patient treated at the 6 mg/m2 dose level. Disease stabilization was observed in seven patients (four patients treated at 4 mg/m2 and one patient at each dose level of 2, 5, and 6 mg/m2). The remaining patients had all progressive disease. The median time to progression for all patients was 5.9 weeks. Pharmacokinetics of diflomotecan was described with a three-compartmental model. Mean population parameter estimates of the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc) increased linearly with body surface area (BSA) as: Vc (L) = 41.5 × (BSA/1.85), and the mean population estimate of the apparent volume of distribution of the shallow compartment was lower in females (29.5 vs 48.8 L). Computer simulations showed the lack of clinical significance of these covariates. The time course of the neutropenic response was adequately described by a semi-mechanistic model that includes cellular processes and drug effects. Conclusions: The MTD and RD after a 20-min iv infusion of diflomotecan every 3 weeks are 4 and 5 mg/m2, respectively. Diflomotecan showed linear pharmacokinetic behaviour and the selected PK/PD model described adequately the time course of neutropenia. The mean model predicted values of nadir and time to nadir after a 20-min iv infusion of 4 mg/m2 of diflomotecan was 0.86 × 109 /L neutrophil cell counts and 11 days, respectively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bailly C (2003) Homocamptothecins: potent topoisomerase I inhibitors and promising anticancer drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 45:91–108PubMedCrossRef Bailly C (2003) Homocamptothecins: potent topoisomerase I inhibitors and promising anticancer drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 45:91–108PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ulukan H, Swaan PW (2002) Camptothecins. A review of their chemotherapeutic potential. Drugs 62:2039–2057CrossRefPubMed Ulukan H, Swaan PW (2002) Camptothecins. A review of their chemotherapeutic potential. Drugs 62:2039–2057CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lavergne O, Demarquay D, Kasprzyk PG, Bigg DC (2000) Homocamptothecins: E-ring modified CPT analogues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 922: 100–111PubMedCrossRef Lavergne O, Demarquay D, Kasprzyk PG, Bigg DC (2000) Homocamptothecins: E-ring modified CPT analogues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 922: 100–111PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Versace RW (2003) The silatecans, a novel class of lipophilic camptothecins. Expert Opin Ther Patents 13:751–760CrossRef Versace RW (2003) The silatecans, a novel class of lipophilic camptothecins. Expert Opin Ther Patents 13:751–760CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Demarquay D, Huchet M, Coulomb H, Lesueur-Ginot L, Lavergne O, Kasprzyk PG, Bailly Ch, Cámara J, Bigg DCH (2001) The homocampthotecin BN80915 is a highly potent orally active topoisomerase I poison. Anti-Cancer Drugs 12:9–19CrossRefPubMed Demarquay D, Huchet M, Coulomb H, Lesueur-Ginot L, Lavergne O, Kasprzyk PG, Bailly Ch, Cámara J, Bigg DCH (2001) The homocampthotecin BN80915 is a highly potent orally active topoisomerase I poison. Anti-Cancer Drugs 12:9–19CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lansiaux A, Facompre M, Wattez N, Hildebrand MP, Bal C, Demarquay D, Lavergne O, Bigg DC, Bailly C (2001) Apoptosis induced by the homocamptothecin anticancer drug BN80915 in HL-60 Cells. Mol Pharmacol 60:450–461PubMed Lansiaux A, Facompre M, Wattez N, Hildebrand MP, Bal C, Demarquay D, Lavergne O, Bigg DC, Bailly C (2001) Apoptosis induced by the homocamptothecin anticancer drug BN80915 in HL-60 Cells. Mol Pharmacol 60:450–461PubMed
7.
go back to reference Huchet M, Demarquay D, Coulomb H, Kasprzyk P, Carlson M, Lauer J, Lavergne O, Bigg D (2000) The dual topoisomerase inhibitor, BN 80927, is highly potent against cell proliferation and tumor growth. Ann N Y Acad Sci 922:303–305PubMedCrossRef Huchet M, Demarquay D, Coulomb H, Kasprzyk P, Carlson M, Lauer J, Lavergne O, Bigg D (2000) The dual topoisomerase inhibitor, BN 80927, is highly potent against cell proliferation and tumor growth. Ann N Y Acad Sci 922:303–305PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gelderblom H, Salazar R, Verweij J, Pentheroudakis G, de Jonge MJA, Devlin M, van Hooije Ch, Seguy F, Obach R, Pruñonosa J, Principe P, Twelves Ch (2003) Phase I Pharmacological and bioavailability study of oral diflomotecan (BN80915), a novel E-ring-modified Camptothecin analogue in adults with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 9:4101–4107PubMed Gelderblom H, Salazar R, Verweij J, Pentheroudakis G, de Jonge MJA, Devlin M, van Hooije Ch, Seguy F, Obach R, Pruñonosa J, Principe P, Twelves Ch (2003) Phase I Pharmacological and bioavailability study of oral diflomotecan (BN80915), a novel E-ring-modified Camptothecin analogue in adults with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 9:4101–4107PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sparreboom A, Gelderblom H, Marsh S, Ahluwalia R, Obach R, Principe P, Twelves Ch, Verweij J, McLeod HL (2004) Diflomotecan pharmacokinetics in relation to ABCG2421C>A genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76:38–44CrossRefPubMed Sparreboom A, Gelderblom H, Marsh S, Ahluwalia R, Obach R, Principe P, Twelves Ch, Verweij J, McLeod HL (2004) Diflomotecan pharmacokinetics in relation to ABCG2421C>A genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76:38–44CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Friberg LE, Henningsson A, Maas H, Nguyen L, Karlsson MO (2002) Model of chaemotherapy-induced myelosupression with parameter consistency across drugs. J Clin Oncol 20:4713–4721CrossRefPubMed Friberg LE, Henningsson A, Maas H, Nguyen L, Karlsson MO (2002) Model of chaemotherapy-induced myelosupression with parameter consistency across drugs. J Clin Oncol 20:4713–4721CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Baker SD, Li J, ten Tije AJ, Figg WD, Graveland W, Verweij J, Sparreboom A (2005) Relationship of systemic exposure to unbound docetaxel and neutropaenia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 77:43–53CrossRefPubMed Baker SD, Li J, ten Tije AJ, Figg WD, Graveland W, Verweij J, Sparreboom A (2005) Relationship of systemic exposure to unbound docetaxel and neutropaenia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 77:43–53CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1992) (eds) NONMEM user’s guides. NONMEM Project Group, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1992) (eds) NONMEM user’s guides. NONMEM Project Group, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco
13.
go back to reference Mandema JW, Verotta D, Sheiner LB (1992) Building population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models; I: models for covariate effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 20:511–528CrossRefPubMed Mandema JW, Verotta D, Sheiner LB (1992) Building population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models; I: models for covariate effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 20:511–528CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO (1999) Xpose: an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58:51–64CrossRefPubMed Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO (1999) Xpose: an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58:51–64CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1981) Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9:503–12CrossRefPubMed Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1981) Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9:503–12CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yano Y, Beal SL, Sheiner LB (2001) Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 28:171–192PubMedCrossRef Yano Y, Beal SL, Sheiner LB (2001) Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 28:171–192PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mould DR, Holford NHG, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Hutson PR, Rosing H, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Rowinsky EK, Schiller JH, Russo M, Ross G (2002) Population pharmacokinetic and adverse event analysis of topotecan in patients with solid tumors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 71: 334–348PubMedCrossRef Mould DR, Holford NHG, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Hutson PR, Rosing H, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Rowinsky EK, Schiller JH, Russo M, Ross G (2002) Population pharmacokinetic and adverse event analysis of topotecan in patients with solid tumors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 71: 334–348PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schellens JHM, Heinrich B, Lehnert M, Gore ME, Kaye SB, Dombernowsky P, Paridaens R, van Oosterom AT, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Calvert H, Pavlidis N, Cortes-Funes H, Wanders J, Roelvink M, Sessa C, Selinger K, Wissel PS, Gamucci T, Hanauske AR (2002) Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic analysis of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan in phase II studies. Invest New Drug 20:83–93CrossRef Schellens JHM, Heinrich B, Lehnert M, Gore ME, Kaye SB, Dombernowsky P, Paridaens R, van Oosterom AT, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Calvert H, Pavlidis N, Cortes-Funes H, Wanders J, Roelvink M, Sessa C, Selinger K, Wissel PS, Gamucci T, Hanauske AR (2002) Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic analysis of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan in phase II studies. Invest New Drug 20:83–93CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xie R, Mathijssen RHJ, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, Karlsson MO (2002) Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72:265–275CrossRefPubMed Xie R, Mathijssen RHJ, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, Karlsson MO (2002) Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72:265–275CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, de Jongue MJA, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2002) Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations. J Clin Oncol 20:81–87CrossRefPubMed Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, de Jongue MJA, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2002) Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations. J Clin Oncol 20:81–87CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Solá J, Gay-Feutry C, Massiere F, Peraire C, Obach R, Principe P (2003) In vitro metabolism of diflomotecan in humans. Evaluation of the CYP inhibition potential. Drug Metab Rev 35(Supp 1):51 Solá J, Gay-Feutry C, Massiere F, Peraire C, Obach R, Principe P (2003) In vitro metabolism of diflomotecan in humans. Evaluation of the CYP inhibition potential. Drug Metab Rev 35(Supp 1):51
22.
go back to reference Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowisnky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JH, Grochow LB, Sparreboom A (2002) Role of body surface area in dosing investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–2001. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1883–1888PubMed Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowisnky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JH, Grochow LB, Sparreboom A (2002) Role of body surface area in dosing investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–2001. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1883–1888PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ (1966) Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med 64:328–340PubMed Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ (1966) Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med 64:328–340PubMed
24.
go back to reference Larsen AK, Gilbert C, Chyzak G, Plisov SY, Naguibneva I, Lavergne O, Lesueur-Ginot L, Bigg DCH (2001) Unusual potency of BN 80915, a novel fluorinated E-ring modified camptothecin, toward human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 61:2961–2967PubMed Larsen AK, Gilbert C, Chyzak G, Plisov SY, Naguibneva I, Lavergne O, Lesueur-Ginot L, Bigg DCH (2001) Unusual potency of BN 80915, a novel fluorinated E-ring modified camptothecin, toward human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 61:2961–2967PubMed
25.
go back to reference Philippart P, Harper L, Chaboteaux C, Decaestecker Ch, Bronckart Y, Gordover L, Leseur-Ginot L, Malonne H, Lavergne O, Bigg DCH, Mendes da Costa P, Kiss R (2000) Homocamptothecin, an E-ring-modified camptothecin, exerts more potent antiproliferative activity than other topoisomerase I inhibitors in human colon cancers obtained from surgery and maintained in vitro under histotypical culture conditions. Clin Cancer Res 6:1557–1562PubMed Philippart P, Harper L, Chaboteaux C, Decaestecker Ch, Bronckart Y, Gordover L, Leseur-Ginot L, Malonne H, Lavergne O, Bigg DCH, Mendes da Costa P, Kiss R (2000) Homocamptothecin, an E-ring-modified camptothecin, exerts more potent antiproliferative activity than other topoisomerase I inhibitors in human colon cancers obtained from surgery and maintained in vitro under histotypical culture conditions. Clin Cancer Res 6:1557–1562PubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase I dose-finding study and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the neutropenic response of intravenous diflomotecan in patients with advanced malignant tumours
Authors
Iñaki F. Trocòniz
María J. Garrido
Cristina Segura
Josep-María Cendrós
Paola Principe
Concepción Peraire
Rosendo Obach
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0112-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2006 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine