Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 5/2015

01-07-2015 | Review

MRCP imaging of duplicate gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature

Authors: Alex Botsford, Kathy McKay, Angus Hartery, Connie Hapgood

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Duplicate gallbladder is a rare congenital abnormality of the hepatobiliary system that has an incidence of roughly 1 in 4000. Many surgical studies have demonstrated that congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and anatomical variations of its position are associated with an increased risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Using ultrasound, MRCP and 3D reconstructions, we report a case of a 29-year-old female who was incidentally revealed to have a duplicated gallbladder. A review of the literature surrounding this variant, its anatomical classifications and relevance to surgical practice is included.

Conclusion

The double gallbladder is a rare congenital condition that is often not considered in the differential diagnosis for a patient with gallbladder disease or intraoperatively. At present, it is only detected via pre-operative imaging in 50 % of cases, but an understanding of the limitations of ultrasound combined with more frequent and thorough use of MRCP before surgical intervention could prevent serious complications of laparoscopy in these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Borghi F et al (2008) Perforation of missed double gallbladder after primary laparoscopic cholecystectomy: endoscopic and laparoscopic management. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(3):429–431CrossRefPubMed Borghi F et al (2008) Perforation of missed double gallbladder after primary laparoscopic cholecystectomy: endoscopic and laparoscopic management. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(3):429–431CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Boyden EA (1926) The accessory gall-bladder—an embryological and comparative study of aberrant biliary vesicles occurring in man and the domestic mammals. Am J Anat 38:177–231CrossRef Boyden EA (1926) The accessory gall-bladder—an embryological and comparative study of aberrant biliary vesicles occurring in man and the domestic mammals. Am J Anat 38:177–231CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Causey MW et al (2010) Gallbladder duplication: evaluation, treatment, and classification. J Pediatr Surg 45(2):443–446CrossRefPubMed Causey MW et al (2010) Gallbladder duplication: evaluation, treatment, and classification. J Pediatr Surg 45(2):443–446CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de Leeuw TG et al (1995) A double or bilobar gallbladder as a cause of severe complications after (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9(9):998–1000CrossRefPubMed de Leeuw TG et al (1995) A double or bilobar gallbladder as a cause of severe complications after (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9(9):998–1000CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gigot J et al (1997) Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder duplication. A plea for removal of both gallbladders. Surg Endosc 11(5):479–482CrossRefPubMed Gigot J et al (1997) Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder duplication. A plea for removal of both gallbladders. Surg Endosc 11(5):479–482CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gocmen R, Yesilkaya Y (2012) Imaging findings of gallbladder duplication due to two cases: case report and review of literature. Med Ultrason 14(4):358–360PubMed Gocmen R, Yesilkaya Y (2012) Imaging findings of gallbladder duplication due to two cases: case report and review of literature. Med Ultrason 14(4):358–360PubMed
7.
go back to reference Goiney RC et al (1985) Sonography of gallbladder duplication and differential considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 145(2):241–243CrossRefPubMed Goiney RC et al (1985) Sonography of gallbladder duplication and differential considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 145(2):241–243CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Harlaftis N, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE (1977) Multiple gallbladders. Surg Gynecol Obstet 145:928–934PubMed Harlaftis N, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE (1977) Multiple gallbladders. Surg Gynecol Obstet 145:928–934PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim RD et al (2009) Duplicate gallbladder arising from the left hepatic duct: report of a case. Surg Today 39(6):536–539CrossRefPubMed Kim RD et al (2009) Duplicate gallbladder arising from the left hepatic duct: report of a case. Surg Today 39(6):536–539CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kothari PR et al (2005) Unusual features of gall bladder duplication cyst with review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int 21(7):552–554CrossRefPubMed Kothari PR et al (2005) Unusual features of gall bladder duplication cyst with review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int 21(7):552–554CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ozgen A et al (1999) Gallbladder duplication: imaging findings and differential considerations. Abdom Imaging 24(3):285–288CrossRefPubMed Ozgen A et al (1999) Gallbladder duplication: imaging findings and differential considerations. Abdom Imaging 24(3):285–288CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Singh B et al (2006) Duplicate gallbladder: an unusual case report. Surg Radiol Anat 28(6):654–657CrossRefPubMed Singh B et al (2006) Duplicate gallbladder: an unusual case report. Surg Radiol Anat 28(6):654–657CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vitellas KM et al (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 20(4):939–957 (quiz 1107–8, 12)CrossRefPubMed Vitellas KM et al (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 20(4):939–957 (quiz 1107–8, 12)CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRCP imaging of duplicate gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature
Authors
Alex Botsford
Kathy McKay
Angus Hartery
Connie Hapgood
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1456-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 5/2015 Go to the issue