Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 9/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Article

A three-dimensional study of the atlantodental interval in a normal Chinese population using reformatted computed tomography

Authors: Yuchun Chen, Zerui Zhuang, Weili Qi, Haiying Yang, Zhenping Chen, Xinjia Wang, Kangmei Kong

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 9/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The atlantodental interval has been usually used for the evaluation of atlantoaxial instability. However, the asymmetry of the lateral atlantodental interval is occasionally found in healthy individuals. Controversy therefore exists as to the clinical significance of this asymmetry in patients after trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the normal range of atlantodental intervals in normal individuals using reformatted computed tomography. In this study, C1–C2 vertebrae were imaged in 230 adult patients by a Lightspeed Vct CT (General Electric, CT, USA) with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm. After reformatting the original images, the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI) and lateral atlantodental interval (LADI) were measured. The AADI was found to be 1.83 ± 0.46 mm (0.9–3.4 mm) in males and 1.63 ± 0.43 mm (0.5–3.2 mm) in females. The AADI was significantly greater in males than in females (p < 0.05). The 95% confidence interval for AADI was 1.75–1.90 mm in males and 1.54–1.72 mm in females. No statistically significant differences were found between males and females in the left and right LADI, and LADI asymmetry. The left LADI was found to be 3.38 ± 0.87 mm (1.7–6.0 mm), and the right LADI was 3.42 ± 0.84 mm (1.7–5.9 mm) in males, while the left LADI was 3.30 ± 0.73 mm (1.5–5.3 mm) and the right LADI was 3.37 ± 0.92 mm (1.7–5.9 mm) in females. The 95% confidence interval for left LADI was 3.23–3.52 and 2.94–3.25 mm, and for right LADI was 3.27–3.56 and 3.18–3.56 mm in males and females, respectively. The mean asymmetry of LADI was 0.76 ± 0.66 mm (0.0–3.5 mm) in males and 0.73 ± 0.70 mm (0.0–3.7 mm) in females. The 95% confidence interval for LADI asymmetry was 0.65–0.87 mm in males and 0.59–0.88 mm in females. Most of the population was found to have an asymmetry ranging between 0.1 and 2.0 mm. The current study shows that LADI asymmetry is common in patients without any cervical spine abnormalities. LADI asymmetry may be a normal anatomic variant and there is no evidence to confirm that LADI asymmetry is a sensitive or specific indicator of traumatic atlantoaxial instability. Radiologists and clinicians should be aware of this normal range of asymmetry when interpreting CT scans of the atlantoaxial region.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ajmal M, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid Lateral Mass Interval (OLMI) asymmetry and rotary subluxation: a retrospective study in cervical spine injury. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:23–26PubMed Ajmal M, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid Lateral Mass Interval (OLMI) asymmetry and rotary subluxation: a retrospective study in cervical spine injury. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:23–26PubMed
2.
go back to reference Deliganis AV, Baxter AB, Hanson JA et al. (2000) Radiologic spectrum of craniocervical distraction injuries. Radiographics 20 Spec No:S237–S250 Deliganis AV, Baxter AB, Hanson JA et al. (2000) Radiologic spectrum of craniocervical distraction injuries. Radiographics 20 Spec No:S237–S250
3.
go back to reference Diaz JJ, Aulino JM, Collier B et al (2005) The early work-up for isolated ligamentous injury of the cervical spine: does computed tomography scan have a role? J Trauma 59:897–904PubMedCrossRef Diaz JJ, Aulino JM, Collier B et al (2005) The early work-up for isolated ligamentous injury of the cervical spine: does computed tomography scan have a role? J Trauma 59:897–904PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Duan S, Ye F, Kang J (2007) Three-dimensional CT study on normal anatomical features of atlanto-axial joints. Surg Radiol Anat 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef Duan S, Ye F, Kang J (2007) Three-dimensional CT study on normal anatomical features of atlanto-axial joints. Surg Radiol Anat 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Duan SY, Lin QC, Pang RL (2004) Application of CT 3D reconstruction in diagnosing atlantoaxial subluxation. Chin J Traumatol 7:118–121PubMed Duan SY, Lin QC, Pang RL (2004) Application of CT 3D reconstruction in diagnosing atlantoaxial subluxation. Chin J Traumatol 7:118–121PubMed
6.
go back to reference Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Sholukha V et al (2010) In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension. Surg Radiol Anat 32:141–151PubMedCrossRef Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Sholukha V et al (2010) In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension. Surg Radiol Anat 32:141–151PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dumas JL, Thoreux P, Attali P et al (1994) Three-dimensional CT analysis of atlantoaxial rotation: results in the normal subject. Surg Radiol Anat 16:199–204PubMedCrossRef Dumas JL, Thoreux P, Attali P et al (1994) Three-dimensional CT analysis of atlantoaxial rotation: results in the normal subject. Surg Radiol Anat 16:199–204PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ellis GL (1991) Imaging of the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:719–732PubMed Ellis GL (1991) Imaging of the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:719–732PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ (1977) Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. (Fixed rotatory subluxation of the atlanto-axial joint). J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:37–44PubMed Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ (1977) Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. (Fixed rotatory subluxation of the atlanto-axial joint). J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:37–44PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gale SC, Gracias VH, Reilly PM et al (2005) The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma 59:1121–1125PubMedCrossRef Gale SC, Gracias VH, Reilly PM et al (2005) The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma 59:1121–1125PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harty JA, Lenehan B, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid lateral mass asymmetry: do we over-investigate? Emerg Med J 22:625–627PubMedCrossRef Harty JA, Lenehan B, O’Rourke SK (2005) Odontoid lateral mass asymmetry: do we over-investigate? Emerg Med J 22:625–627PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hinck VC, Hopkins CE (1960) Measurement of the atlanto-dental interval in the adult. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 84:945–951PubMed Hinck VC, Hopkins CE (1960) Measurement of the atlanto-dental interval in the adult. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 84:945–951PubMed
13.
go back to reference Iannacone WM, DeLong WG Jr, Born CT et al (1990) Dynamic computerized tomography of the occiput-atlas-axis complex in trauma patients with odontoid lateral mass asymmetry. J Trauma 30:1501–1505PubMedCrossRef Iannacone WM, DeLong WG Jr, Born CT et al (1990) Dynamic computerized tomography of the occiput-atlas-axis complex in trauma patients with odontoid lateral mass asymmetry. J Trauma 30:1501–1505PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Klimo P, Ware ML, Gupta N et al (2007) Cervical spine trauma in the pediatric patient. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18:599–620PubMedCrossRef Klimo P, Ware ML, Gupta N et al (2007) Cervical spine trauma in the pediatric patient. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18:599–620PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee S, Joyce S, Seeger J (1986) Asymmetry of the odontoid-lateral mass interspaces: a radiographic finding of questionable clinical significance. Ann Emerg Med 15:1173–1176PubMedCrossRef Lee S, Joyce S, Seeger J (1986) Asymmetry of the odontoid-lateral mass interspaces: a radiographic finding of questionable clinical significance. Ann Emerg Med 15:1173–1176PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mirvis SE (1998) How much lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry and atlantoaxial lateral mass asymmetry is acceptable on an open-mouth odontoid radiograph, and when is additional investigation necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1106–1107PubMed Mirvis SE (1998) How much lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry and atlantoaxial lateral mass asymmetry is acceptable on an open-mouth odontoid radiograph, and when is additional investigation necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1106–1107PubMed
18.
go back to reference Roberge RJ (1991) Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:733–742PubMed Roberge RJ (1991) Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 9:733–742PubMed
19.
go back to reference Roche CJ, King SJ, Dangerfield PH et al (2002) The atlanto-axial joint: physiological range of rotation on MRI and CT. Clin Radiol 57:103–108PubMedCrossRef Roche CJ, King SJ, Dangerfield PH et al (2002) The atlanto-axial joint: physiological range of rotation on MRI and CT. Clin Radiol 57:103–108PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rojas CA, Hayes A, Bertozzi JC et al (2009) Evaluation of the C1–C2 articulation on MDCT in healthy children and young adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1388–1392PubMedCrossRef Rojas CA, Hayes A, Bertozzi JC et al (2009) Evaluation of the C1–C2 articulation on MDCT in healthy children and young adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1388–1392PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sutherland JP Jr, Yaszemski MJ, White AA 3rd (1995) Radiographic appearance of the odontoid lateral mass interspace in the occipitoatlantoaxial complex. Spine 20:2221–2225PubMedCrossRef Sutherland JP Jr, Yaszemski MJ, White AA 3rd (1995) Radiographic appearance of the odontoid lateral mass interspace in the occipitoatlantoaxial complex. Spine 20:2221–2225PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wortzman G, Dewar FP (1968) Rotary fixation of the atlantoaxial joint: rotational atlantoaxial subluxation. Radiology 90:479–487PubMed Wortzman G, Dewar FP (1968) Rotary fixation of the atlantoaxial joint: rotational atlantoaxial subluxation. Radiology 90:479–487PubMed
Metadata
Title
A three-dimensional study of the atlantodental interval in a normal Chinese population using reformatted computed tomography
Authors
Yuchun Chen
Zerui Zhuang
Weili Qi
Haiying Yang
Zhenping Chen
Xinjia Wang
Kangmei Kong
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0817-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2011

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 9/2011 Go to the issue

Anatomic Variations

Accessory hepatic lobe