Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 10/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Article

Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block

Authors: Anjali Aggarwal, Aditya Aggarwal, Harjeet, Daisy Sahni

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sacral approach to epidural space produces reliable and effective block of sacral nerves. It is necessary to have a detailed knowledge of sacral hiatus (SH) for optimal access into sacral epidural space. This study was undertaken to evaluate various landmarks of SH.

Methods

One hundred and fourteen adult dry human sacral bones were examined for morphometric analysis using vernier caliper. SH was categorized on the basis of shape.

Results

Most commonly encountered shape of hiatus was inverted U (40.35%). Its apex and base were most commonly observed against fourth and fifth sacral vertebrae, respectively. Various defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal were recorded. Height and anteroposterior depth at the apex of hiatus were ranged 4.30–38.60 and 1.90–10.40 mm, respectively. Mean intercornual distance at base was 11.95 ± 2.78 mm. The triangle formed by right and left posterior superior iliac spines and apex of SH was found equilateral in 45% cases only. Sacral cornua were marked by their bilateral presence in 55.26% and impalpable in 21.05% cases. Minimum distance between S2 and apex was 7.25 mm which suggested that it would not be safe to push the needle beyond 7 mm into sacral canal so as to avoid dural puncture. In 8.77% cases, depth of hiatus was less than 3 mm.

Conclusions

Single bony landmark may not help in locating SH because of anatomical variations. Depth of hiatus less than 3 mm may be one of the causes for failure of needle insertion. Surrounding bony irregularities, different shapes of hiatus and defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal should be taken into consideration before undertaking caudal epidural block so as to avoid its failure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Black MG (1949) Anatomic reasons for caudal anesthesia failure. Anesth Analg 28:33–39CrossRef Black MG (1949) Anatomic reasons for caudal anesthesia failure. Anesth Analg 28:33–39CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bush K, Hillier S (1991) A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine 16:572–575CrossRefPubMed Bush K, Hillier S (1991) A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine 16:572–575CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen PC, Tang SFT, Hsu TC et al (2004) Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anaesthesiology 101:181–184CrossRef Chen PC, Tang SFT, Hsu TC et al (2004) Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anaesthesiology 101:181–184CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW (1985) The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of radicular pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:63–66PubMed Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW (1985) The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of radicular pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:63–66PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lanier VS, McKnight HE, Trotter M (1944) Caudal analgesia: an experimental and anatomical study. Am J Obstet Gynaec 47(5):633–641 Lanier VS, McKnight HE, Trotter M (1944) Caudal analgesia: an experimental and anatomical study. Am J Obstet Gynaec 47(5):633–641
6.
go back to reference Martin LVH (1994) Sacral epidural (caudal) block. In: Wildsmith JAW, Armitage EN (eds) Principles and practice of regional anaesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 127–134 Martin LVH (1994) Sacral epidural (caudal) block. In: Wildsmith JAW, Armitage EN (eds) Principles and practice of regional anaesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 127–134
7.
go back to reference Nagar SK (2004) A study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. J Anat Soc India 53(2):18–21 Nagar SK (2004) A study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. J Anat Soc India 53(2):18–21
8.
go back to reference Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S (2004) An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain 20:51–54CrossRefPubMed Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S (2004) An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain 20:51–54CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H et al (2005) Landmarks of the Sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaes 95(5):692–695CrossRef Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H et al (2005) Landmarks of the Sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaes 95(5):692–695CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Trotter M (1947) Variations of sacral canal: their significance in the administration of caudal analgesia. Anesth Analg 26(5):192–202 Trotter M (1947) Variations of sacral canal: their significance in the administration of caudal analgesia. Anesth Analg 26(5):192–202
11.
go back to reference Williams A, Newell RLM, Collins P (2005) Back and macroscopic anatomy of spinal cord. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th edn. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 725–773 Williams A, Newell RLM, Collins P (2005) Back and macroscopic anatomy of spinal cord. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th edn. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 725–773
Metadata
Title
Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block
Authors
Anjali Aggarwal
Aditya Aggarwal
Harjeet
Daisy Sahni
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 10/2009 Go to the issue