Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 7/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Article

Evaluation of the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta

Authors: Nilgun Isiksalan Ozbulbul, Mehmet Yurdakul, Hakan Dedeoglu, Muharrem Tola, Tulay Olcer

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the aorta.

Methods

On axial and sagittal images from abdomen CT scan, the distance and the angle between the SMA and the aorta were measured at the location where the third part of the duodenum crosses. The visceral fat area was calculated at the level of the umbilicus on the abdominal CT section. Body mass index was calculated.

Results

For both genders, the correlation between the distance and visceral fat area was substantial (p < 0.001). For males, there was no statistically significant relationship between the angle and the visceral fat area. For females, the correlation between the angle and the visceral fat area was low but significant and positive (r = 0.25, p < 0.048). In addition, it was found that males have a greater proportion of visceral fat than females. In both females and males, the subcutaneous fat area correlated with BMI (r = 0.65, r = 0.69, respectively, p < 0.001), more strongly than the visceral fat area did (r = 0.51, r = 0.63, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The distance between the aorta and the SMA significantly correlates with visceral fat area than with BMI. The size of visceral fat area of females and males vary; therefore, the amount of visceral fat area should be considered in the establishing diagnosis of SMA syndrome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams TD, Heath EM, LaMonte MJ et al (2007) The relationship between body mass index and per cent body fat in the severely obese. Diabet Obes Metab 9:498–505CrossRef Adams TD, Heath EM, LaMonte MJ et al (2007) The relationship between body mass index and per cent body fat in the severely obese. Diabet Obes Metab 9:498–505CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2007) Multidetector row CT of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:62–65PubMedCrossRef Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2007) Multidetector row CT of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:62–65PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Earnshaw PM, Fraser GM (1982) Extrinsic compression of the third part of the duodenum. Clin Radiol 33:75–81PubMedCrossRef Anderson JR, Earnshaw PM, Fraser GM (1982) Extrinsic compression of the third part of the duodenum. Clin Radiol 33:75–81PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H et al (2002) Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int J Obes 26:208–213CrossRef Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H et al (2002) Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int J Obes 26:208–213CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bedogni G, Pietrobelli A, Heymsfield S et al (2001) Is body mass index a measure of adiposity in elderly women? Obes Res 9:17–20PubMedCrossRef Bedogni G, Pietrobelli A, Heymsfield S et al (2001) Is body mass index a measure of adiposity in elderly women? Obes Res 9:17–20PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hirooka M, Kumagi T, Kurose K et al (2005) A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ultrasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Intern Med 44:794–799PubMedCrossRef Hirooka M, Kumagi T, Kurose K et al (2005) A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ultrasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Intern Med 44:794–799PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M et al (2002) A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes 26:398–402CrossRef Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M et al (2002) A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes 26:398–402CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Konen E, Amitai M, Apter S et al (1998) CT angiography of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 171:1279–1281 Konen E, Amitai M, Apter S et al (1998) CT angiography of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 171:1279–1281
9.
go back to reference Ozkurt H, Cenker MM, Bas N et al (2007) Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery: normal values in different BMI categories. Surg Radiol Anat 29:595–599PubMedCrossRef Ozkurt H, Cenker MM, Bas N et al (2007) Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery: normal values in different BMI categories. Surg Radiol Anat 29:595–599PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rokitansky C (1861) Lehrbuch der Pathologischen Anatomie. Braumuller & Siedel, Vienna Rokitansky C (1861) Lehrbuch der Pathologischen Anatomie. Braumuller & Siedel, Vienna
11.
go back to reference Rosa-Jimenez F, Rodriguez Gonzalez FJ, Puente Gutierrez JJ et al (2003) Duodenal compression caused by superior mesenteric artery: study of 10 patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 9:485–489 Rosa-Jimenez F, Rodriguez Gonzalez FJ, Puente Gutierrez JJ et al (2003) Duodenal compression caused by superior mesenteric artery: study of 10 patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 9:485–489
12.
go back to reference Roy A, Gisel JJ, Roy V et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery (Wilkie’s) syndrome as a result of cardiac cachexia. J Gen Intern Med 20:c3–c4PubMedCrossRef Roy A, Gisel JJ, Roy V et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery (Wilkie’s) syndrome as a result of cardiac cachexia. J Gen Intern Med 20:c3–c4PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Siedell JC, Oosterlee A, Thijssen M et al (1987) Assessment of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 45:7–13 Siedell JC, Oosterlee A, Thijssen M et al (1987) Assessment of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 45:7–13
14.
go back to reference Unal B, Aktas A, Kemal G et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: CT and ultrasonography findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:90–95PubMed Unal B, Aktas A, Kemal G et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: CT and ultrasonography findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:90–95PubMed
15.
go back to reference Welsch T, Büchler MW, Kienle P (2007) Recalling superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Dig Surg 24:149–156PubMedCrossRef Welsch T, Büchler MW, Kienle P (2007) Recalling superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Dig Surg 24:149–156PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M et al (1999) Abdominal fat: standartized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology 211:283–286PubMed Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M et al (1999) Abdominal fat: standartized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology 211:283–286PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta
Authors
Nilgun Isiksalan Ozbulbul
Mehmet Yurdakul
Hakan Dedeoglu
Muharrem Tola
Tulay Olcer
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0482-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 7/2009 Go to the issue