Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply to: “Regarding ‘PET/CT Imaging Characteristics After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer’”

Authors: Amy R. Deipolyi, Ryan W. England, Fourat Ridouani, Christopher C. Riedl, Henry S. Kunin, F. Edward Boas, Hooman Yarmohammadi, Constantinos T. Sofocleous

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read the commenter’s letter with interest. We acknowledge that the terminology in our text could have been clearer—our use of the term “dose,” based on historical use of the term, to describe amounts of activity should be updated in modern literature. We thank the commenter for their diligence. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dezarn WA, Cessna JT, DeWerd LA, et al. Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on dosimetry, imaging, and quality assurance procedures for 90Y microsphere brachytherapy in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. Med Phys. 2011;38:4824–45.CrossRef Dezarn WA, Cessna JT, DeWerd LA, et al. Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on dosimetry, imaging, and quality assurance procedures for 90Y microsphere brachytherapy in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. Med Phys. 2011;38:4824–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reply to: “Regarding ‘PET/CT Imaging Characteristics After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer’”
Authors
Amy R. Deipolyi
Ryan W. England
Fourat Ridouani
Christopher C. Riedl
Henry S. Kunin
F. Edward Boas
Hooman Yarmohammadi
Constantinos T. Sofocleous
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02428-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2020 Go to the issue