Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Clinical Investigation

Radiation Dose and Risk Estimates of CT-Guided Percutaneous Liver Ablations and Factors Associated with Dose Reduction

Authors: Colin J. McCarthy, Aoife Kilcoyne, Xinhua Li, Alexis M. Cahalane, Bob Liu, Ronald S. Arellano, Raul N. Uppot, Michael S. Gee

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the radiation dose associated with CT-guided percutaneous liver ablations and identify potential risk factors that result in higher radiation doses.

Materials and Methods

Between June 2011 and June 2015, 245 consecutive patients underwent 304 CT-guided liver ablation treatments. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and procedural parameters were identified and analyzed. The peak skin dose and effective dose were assessed for each procedure. Excess relative risk related to radiation effects was calculated. A logistic regression model was prepared by means of stepwise logistic regression to identify variables predictive of increased radiation exposure.

Results

Tumor ablations were performed with microwave (n = 220), radiofrequency (n = 74) or irreversible electroporation (IRE) (n = 10). The mean peak skin dose for ablations was 239.2 ± 136.4 mGy, and the mean effective dose was 36.6 ± 22.3 mSv. Of the patient and procedural parameters that were analyzed, increasing weight, use of intravenous contrast and/or hydrodissection during the procedure, together with treatment of multiple lesions in the same sitting were all associated with higher radiation exposure. The mean increase in the absolute risk of fatal malignancy from a single procedure was 0.18% (range 0.02–0.9%). No deterministic skin changes were identified in the patient cohort.

Conclusion

The overall risk of stochastic and deterministic effects from radiation associated with CT-guided ablations is low compared with other inherent procedural complications. This study identifies several factors that are associated with higher radiation dose in percutaneous liver ablation procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abdalla EK, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):818–25 (discussion 825-7).CrossRef Abdalla EK, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):818–25 (discussion 825-7).CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gervais DA, Arellano RS. Percutaneous tumor ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(4):789–94.CrossRef Gervais DA, Arellano RS. Percutaneous tumor ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(4):789–94.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldberg SN, et al. Ablation of liver tumors using percutaneous RF therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(4):1023–8.CrossRef Goldberg SN, et al. Ablation of liver tumors using percutaneous RF therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(4):1023–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lubner MG, et al. Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8 Suppl):S192–203.CrossRef Lubner MG, et al. Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8 Suppl):S192–203.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Asvadi NH, et al. CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of tumors in the hepatic dome: assessment of efficacy and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(4):496–502 (quiz 503).CrossRef Asvadi NH, et al. CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of tumors in the hepatic dome: assessment of efficacy and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(4):496–502 (quiz 503).CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hinshaw JL, et al. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: Microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what should you use and why? Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1344–62.CrossRef Hinshaw JL, et al. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: Microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what should you use and why? Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1344–62.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pearce MS, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499–505.CrossRef Pearce MS, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499–505.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miglioretti DL, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700–7.CrossRef Miglioretti DL, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Little MP, et al. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251(1):6–12.CrossRef Little MP, et al. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251(1):6–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leng S, et al. Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):W97–103.CrossRef Leng S, et al. Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):W97–103.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johnson PT, Mahesh M, Fishman EK. Image wisely and choosing wisely: importance of adult body ct protocol design for patient safety, exam quality, and diagnostic efficacy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(11):1185–90.CrossRef Johnson PT, Mahesh M, Fishman EK. Image wisely and choosing wisely: importance of adult body ct protocol design for patient safety, exam quality, and diagnostic efficacy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(11):1185–90.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Balter S, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR Study. Part III: dosimetric performance of the interventional fluoroscopy units. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(9):919–26.CrossRef Balter S, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR Study. Part III: dosimetric performance of the interventional fluoroscopy units. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(9):919–26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller DL, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(8):977–90.CrossRef Miller DL, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(8):977–90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller DL, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(6):711–27.CrossRef Miller DL, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(6):711–27.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH. Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice. Radiology. 2009;253(3):753–64.CrossRef Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH. Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice. Radiology. 2009;253(3):753–64.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Engstrand J, et al. Stereotactic CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver tumors with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation: an accuracy and procedural safety study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(1):193–200.CrossRef Engstrand J, et al. Stereotactic CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver tumors with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation: an accuracy and procedural safety study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(1):193–200.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park BK, et al. Estimated effective dose of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of liver tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(8):1702–6.CrossRef Park BK, et al. Estimated effective dose of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of liver tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(8):1702–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wald C, et al. New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. 2013;266(2):376–82.CrossRef Wald C, et al. New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. 2013;266(2):376–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status—a recapitulation. Anesthesiology. 1978;49(4):233–6.CrossRef Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status—a recapitulation. Anesthesiology. 1978;49(4):233–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference AAPM report No. 96. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. 2008. AAPM report No. 96. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. 2008.
21.
go back to reference Li X, Zhang D, Liu B. Equations for CT dose calculations on axial lines based on the principle of symmetry. Med Phys. 2012;39(9):5347–52.CrossRef Li X, Zhang D, Liu B. Equations for CT dose calculations on axial lines based on the principle of symmetry. Med Phys. 2012;39(9):5347–52.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Li X, Zhang D, Liu B. Monte Carlo assessment of CT dose equilibration in PMMA and water cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031903.CrossRef Li X, Zhang D, Liu B. Monte Carlo assessment of CT dose equilibration in PMMA and water cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031903.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol. 1020;2012(85):e1166–73. Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol. 1020;2012(85):e1166–73.
24.
go back to reference Miller DL, et al. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology. 2002;225(2):329–36.CrossRef Miller DL, et al. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology. 2002;225(2):329–36.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Livraghi T, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology. 1999;210(3):655–61.CrossRef Livraghi T, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology. 1999;210(3):655–61.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Livraghi T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology. 2000;214(3):761–8.CrossRef Livraghi T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology. 2000;214(3):761–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Liang PC, et al. Initial institutional experience of uncooled single-antenna microwave ablation for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(5):e35–40.CrossRef Liang PC, et al. Initial institutional experience of uncooled single-antenna microwave ablation for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(5):e35–40.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Livraghi T, et al. Saline-enhanced radio-frequency tissue ablation in the treatment of liver metastases. Radiology. 1997;202(1):205–10.CrossRef Livraghi T, et al. Saline-enhanced radio-frequency tissue ablation in the treatment of liver metastases. Radiology. 1997;202(1):205–10.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Oshowo A, et al. Comparison of resection and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of solitary colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90(10):1240–3.CrossRef Oshowo A, et al. Comparison of resection and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of solitary colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90(10):1240–3.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Berber E, Pelley R, Siperstein AE. Predictors of survival after radiofrequency thermal ablation of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(7):1358–64.CrossRef Berber E, Pelley R, Siperstein AE. Predictors of survival after radiofrequency thermal ablation of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(7):1358–64.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gillams AR, Lees WR. Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(5):1206–13.CrossRef Gillams AR, Lees WR. Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(5):1206–13.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Livraghi T, et al. Percutaneous radio-frequency ablation of liver metastases from breast cancer: initial experience in 24 patients. Radiology. 2001;220(1):145–9.CrossRef Livraghi T, et al. Percutaneous radio-frequency ablation of liver metastases from breast cancer: initial experience in 24 patients. Radiology. 2001;220(1):145–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Johnson DR, et al. Radiation protection in interventional radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(2):99–106.CrossRef Johnson DR, et al. Radiation protection in interventional radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56(2):99–106.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Noel PB, et al. Does iterative reconstruction lower CT radiation dose: evaluation of 15,000 examinations. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81141.CrossRef Noel PB, et al. Does iterative reconstruction lower CT radiation dose: evaluation of 15,000 examinations. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81141.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kaza RK, et al. Emerging techniques for dose optimization in abdominal CT. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):4–17.CrossRef Kaza RK, et al. Emerging techniques for dose optimization in abdominal CT. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):4–17.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lucey BC, et al. CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1187–94.CrossRef Lucey BC, et al. CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1187–94.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Butros SR, et al. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation of metastatic pelvic tumor from gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):500–5.CrossRef Butros SR, et al. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation of metastatic pelvic tumor from gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):500–5.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Arellano RS, et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of retroperitoneal metastatic disease in patients with gynecologic malignancies: clinical experience with eight patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1635–8.CrossRef Arellano RS, et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of retroperitoneal metastatic disease in patients with gynecologic malignancies: clinical experience with eight patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1635–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Singh S, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology. 2009;252(1):200–8.CrossRef Singh S, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology. 2009;252(1):200–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Andrabi Y, et al. Radiation dose consideration in kidney stone ct examinations: integration of iterative reconstruction algorithms with routine clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(5):1055–63.CrossRef Andrabi Y, et al. Radiation dose consideration in kidney stone ct examinations: integration of iterative reconstruction algorithms with routine clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(5):1055–63.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ebersberger U, et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):125–32.CrossRef Ebersberger U, et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):125–32.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Agrawal MD, et al. Prospective comparison of reduced-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic imaging dataset from dual-energy CT angiography with standard-iodine-dose single-energy CT angiography for abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(6):W125–32.CrossRef Agrawal MD, et al. Prospective comparison of reduced-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic imaging dataset from dual-energy CT angiography with standard-iodine-dose single-energy CT angiography for abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(6):W125–32.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2016. Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2016.
44.
go back to reference Kim KR, Thomas S. Complications of image-guided thermal ablation of liver and kidney neoplasms. Semin Interv Radiol. 2014;31(2):138–48.CrossRef Kim KR, Thomas S. Complications of image-guided thermal ablation of liver and kidney neoplasms. Semin Interv Radiol. 2014;31(2):138–48.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Pandharipande PV, et al. Patients with testicular cancer undergoing CT surveillance demonstrate a pitfall of radiation-induced cancer risk estimates: the timing paradox. Radiology. 2013;266(3):896–904.CrossRef Pandharipande PV, et al. Patients with testicular cancer undergoing CT surveillance demonstrate a pitfall of radiation-induced cancer risk estimates: the timing paradox. Radiology. 2013;266(3):896–904.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Ha CS, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(11):1026–33.CrossRef Ha CS, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria follow-up of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(11):1026–33.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA. Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5(1):71–84.CrossRef Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA. Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5(1):71–84.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kim BH, et al. Temporal improvement in survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus-endemic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(2):475–83.CrossRef Kim BH, et al. Temporal improvement in survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus-endemic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(2):475–83.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Siegel RL, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(3):177–93.CrossRef Siegel RL, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(3):177–93.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Smolock AR, et al. Microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatic adenomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(2):244–9.CrossRef Smolock AR, et al. Microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatic adenomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(2):244–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiation Dose and Risk Estimates of CT-Guided Percutaneous Liver Ablations and Factors Associated with Dose Reduction
Authors
Colin J. McCarthy
Aoife Kilcoyne
Xinhua Li
Alexis M. Cahalane
Bob Liu
Ronald S. Arellano
Raul N. Uppot
Michael S. Gee
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2066-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 12/2018 Go to the issue