Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Clinical Investigation

Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with a New Generation of Beads: Clinical–Radiological Outcomes and Safety Profile

Authors: Carlo Spreafico, Tommaso Cascella, Antonio Facciorusso, Carlo Sposito, Lanocita Rodolfo, Carlo Morosi, Enrico M. Civelli, Marta Vaiani, Sherrie Bhoori, Alessandro Pellegrinelli, Alfonso Marchianò, Vincenzo Mazzaferro

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of the new generation of 70–150 µm drug-eluting beads (M1 DEB) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a primary therapy or as a bridge to liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Forty-five consecutive patients underwent TACE with M1 DEB loaded with doxorubicin (DEBDOX/M1). Clinical data were recorded at 12, 24, and 48 h, 7 and 30 days after treatment. Response was assessed by computed tomographic scan according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria, and a second DEBDOX/M1 TACE was scheduled within 6 weeks in case of a noncomplete response.

Results

All patients had well-compensated cirrhosis (97.7 % Child A, 44.4 % hepatitis C virus, median age 61 years). Twenty patients (44.4 %) had Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer class B disease; the median number of nodules and their sum of diameters were 2 (range 1–6) and 43 mm (range 10–190), respectively. The mean number of TACE procedures per patient was 1.4. Objective response rate (complete + partial response) was 77.7 % with a median time to best response of 3 months (95 % confidence interval 2–4). In 13 patients, DEBDOX/M1 TACE served as a bridge/downstaging to LT/surgery. Pathology showed that more than 90 % necrosis was achieved in 10 of 28 nodules. DEBDOX/M1 TACE was well tolerated, and the grade 3/4 adverse event rate was low (1 of 65 procedures).

Conclusion

DEBDOX/M1 TACE is an effective procedure with a favorable safety profile and promising results in terms of objective response rate, tumor downstaging, and necrosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Bruix J (2003) Systemic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37:429–442PubMedCrossRef Llovet JM, Bruix J (2003) Systemic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37:429–442PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Poon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW et al (2007) A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1100–1108PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW et al (2007) A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1100–1108PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M et al (2007) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 46:474–481PubMedCrossRef Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M et al (2007) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 46:474–481PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lencioni R, de Baere T, Burrel M et al (2012) Transcatheter treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin-loaded DC beads (DEBDOX): technical recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:980–985PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lencioni R, de Baere T, Burrel M et al (2012) Transcatheter treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin-loaded DC beads (DEBDOX): technical recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:980–985PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lencioni R, Crocetti L (2010) Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 262:43–58CrossRef Lencioni R, Crocetti L (2010) Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 262:43–58CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Malagari K, Alexopoulou E, Chatzimichail K et al (2008) Transcatheter chemoembolization in the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for curative treatments: midterm results of doxorubicin-loaded DC beads. Abdom Imaging 33:512–519PubMedCrossRef Malagari K, Alexopoulou E, Chatzimichail K et al (2008) Transcatheter chemoembolization in the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for curative treatments: midterm results of doxorubicin-loaded DC beads. Abdom Imaging 33:512–519PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T et al (2010) Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:41–52PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T et al (2010) Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:41–52PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nicolini A, Martinetti L, Crespi S et al (2010) Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:327–332PubMedCrossRef Nicolini A, Martinetti L, Crespi S et al (2010) Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:327–332PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bonomo G, Pedicini V, Monfardini L et al (2010) Bland embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using precise, tightly size-calibrated, anti-inflammatory microparticles: first clinical experience and one-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:552–559PubMedCrossRef Bonomo G, Pedicini V, Monfardini L et al (2010) Bland embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using precise, tightly size-calibrated, anti-inflammatory microparticles: first clinical experience and one-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:552–559PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Geschwind J (2012) Doxorubicin eluting bead sizes 100–300 μm and 70–150 μm in the VX2 model. Paper presented at: ECIO 2012 (Terumo Symposium) Geschwind J (2012) Doxorubicin eluting bead sizes 100–300 μm and 70–150 μm in the VX2 model. Paper presented at: ECIO 2012 (Terumo Symposium)
11.
go back to reference EASL-EORTC (2012) Clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943 EASL-EORTC (2012) Clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943
12.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338PubMedCrossRef Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRef Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0. NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009. NIH publication 09-7473 National Cancer Institute (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0. NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009. NIH publication 09-7473
15.
go back to reference Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60PubMedCrossRef Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Practice guidelines committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. An update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Practice guidelines committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. An update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Burrel M, Reig M, Forner A et al (2012) Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial embolization (TACE) using drug eluting beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design. J Hepatol 56:1330–1335PubMedCrossRef Burrel M, Reig M, Forner A et al (2012) Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial embolization (TACE) using drug eluting beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design. J Hepatol 56:1330–1335PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Malagari K, Pomoni M, Moschouris H et al (2012) Chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: five-year survival analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:1119–1128PubMedCrossRef Malagari K, Pomoni M, Moschouris H et al (2012) Chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: five-year survival analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:1119–1128PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jun Song M, Chun HL, Song DS et al (2012) Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 57:1244–1250CrossRef Jun Song M, Chun HL, Song DS et al (2012) Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 57:1244–1250CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nicolini D, Svegliati-Baroni G, Candelari R et al (2013) Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 19:5622–5632PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nicolini D, Svegliati-Baroni G, Candelari R et al (2013) Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 19:5622–5632PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sacco R, Bargellini I, Bertini M et al (2011) Conventional versus doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1545–1552PubMedCrossRef Sacco R, Bargellini I, Bertini M et al (2011) Conventional versus doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1545–1552PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Malagari K, Pomoni M, Moschouris H et al (2014) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with Hepasphere 30–60 µm. Safety and efficacy study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:165–175PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Malagari K, Pomoni M, Moschouris H et al (2014) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with Hepasphere 30–60 µm. Safety and efficacy study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:165–175PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with a New Generation of Beads: Clinical–Radiological Outcomes and Safety Profile
Authors
Carlo Spreafico
Tommaso Cascella
Antonio Facciorusso
Carlo Sposito
Lanocita Rodolfo
Carlo Morosi
Enrico M. Civelli
Marta Vaiani
Sherrie Bhoori
Alessandro Pellegrinelli
Alfonso Marchianò
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0907-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2015 Go to the issue