Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Technical Note

Radiation Protection Methods for the Interventionalist’s Hands: Use of an Extension Tube

Authors: Shaheen Dixon, Daniel Schick, John Harper

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cumulative radiation exposure to the hands during certain interventional procedures may be high. It is important to decrease the amount of radiation to the operator due to the possibility of deterministic effects. We performed a pilot study to demonstrate a significant decrease in operator dose when using extension tubing (ET) in combination with shielding and collimation during a simulated percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC) procedure.

Methods

A whole body, anthropomorphic phantom was used to simulate the patient. A Unfors-Xi Survey detector (to measure scatter) supported by a retort stand and trolley was placed in various positions to simulate the position of hands and eyes/thyroid of an interventionalist. Radiation dose was measured simulating left and right-sided PTC punctures with and without a lead shield, and with and without ET.

Results

Regarding the radiation dose to the hands; the use of an ET reduces dose by 54 % in right-sided PTC punctures without a shield and by 91 % if used in combination with a shield. For left-sided PTC punctures, ET reduces hand dose by 75 %. The use of collimation decreases hand dose by approximately 60 %. The use of shielding reduces dose to the eyes/thyroid by 98 %.

Conclusions

The dose to the hands can be significantly reduced with the appropriate use of a shield, ET, and tight collimation. The use of a shield is paramount to reduce dose to the eyes/thyroid. It is important for interventionalists to adhere to radiation protective practice considering the potential deterministic effects during a lifelong career.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Efstathopoulos EP, Pantos I, Andreou M et al (2011) Occupational radiation doses to the extremities and the eyes in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol 84:70–77CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Efstathopoulos EP, Pantos I, Andreou M et al (2011) Occupational radiation doses to the extremities and the eyes in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol 84:70–77CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G et al (2010) Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional society of Europe and the society of interventional radiology. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 33:230–239CrossRef Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G et al (2010) Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional society of Europe and the society of interventional radiology. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 33:230–239CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schröder RJ (2006) Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepatic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:297–796 Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schröder RJ (2006) Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepatic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:297–796
4.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection 2011. Statement on tissue reactions ICRP ref. 4825-3093-1464, April 21, 2011 International Commission on Radiological Protection 2011. Statement on tissue reactions ICRP ref. 4825-3093-1464, April 21, 2011
5.
go back to reference Bouffler S, Ainsbury E, Gilvin P, Harrison J (2012) Radiation-induced cataracts: the Health Protection Agency’s response to the ICRP statement on tissue reactions and recommendations on the dose limit for the eye lens. J Radiol Prot 32:479–488CrossRefPubMed Bouffler S, Ainsbury E, Gilvin P, Harrison J (2012) Radiation-induced cataracts: the Health Protection Agency’s response to the ICRP statement on tissue reactions and recommendations on the dose limit for the eye lens. J Radiol Prot 32:479–488CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vano E, Gonzalez L, Beneytez F, Moreno F (1998) Lens injury induced by occupational exposure in non-optimizes interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol 71:728–733CrossRefPubMed Vano E, Gonzalez L, Beneytez F, Moreno F (1998) Lens injury induced by occupational exposure in non-optimizes interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol 71:728–733CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jacob S, Boveda S, Bar O et al (2013) Interventional cardiologists and risk of radiation-induced cataract: results of a French multicenter observational study. Int J Cardiol 167:1843–1847CrossRefPubMed Jacob S, Boveda S, Bar O et al (2013) Interventional cardiologists and risk of radiation-induced cataract: results of a French multicenter observational study. Int J Cardiol 167:1843–1847CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hammer GP, Scheidemann-Wesp U, Samkange-Zeeb F, Wicke H, Neriishi K, Blettner M (2013) Occupational exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation and cataract development: a systematic literature review and perspectives on future studies. Radiat Environ Biophys 52:303–319CrossRefPubMed Hammer GP, Scheidemann-Wesp U, Samkange-Zeeb F, Wicke H, Neriishi K, Blettner M (2013) Occupational exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation and cataract development: a systematic literature review and perspectives on future studies. Radiat Environ Biophys 52:303–319CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Whitby M, Martin CJ (2005) A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists. Br J Radiol 78:219–229CrossRefPubMed Whitby M, Martin CJ (2005) A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists. Br J Radiol 78:219–229CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Marque N, Jegou A, Varenne O et al (2009) Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed though the radial approach. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 102:749–754CrossRefPubMed Marque N, Jegou A, Varenne O et al (2009) Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed though the radial approach. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 102:749–754CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Abatzoglou I, Koukourakis M, Konstantinides S (2013) Reduction of the radiation dose received by interventional cardiologists following training in radiation protection. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 155:119–121CrossRefPubMed Abatzoglou I, Koukourakis M, Konstantinides S (2013) Reduction of the radiation dose received by interventional cardiologists following training in radiation protection. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 155:119–121CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jacob S, Donadille L, Maccia C et al (2013) Eye lens radiation exposure to interventional cardiologists: a retrospective assessment of cumulative doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 153:282–293CrossRef Jacob S, Donadille L, Maccia C et al (2013) Eye lens radiation exposure to interventional cardiologists: a retrospective assessment of cumulative doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 153:282–293CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maeder M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Wolber T et al (2006) Impact of a lead glass shield on scatter radiation to the eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiol Interv 67:18–24CrossRef Maeder M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Wolber T et al (2006) Impact of a lead glass shield on scatter radiation to the eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiol Interv 67:18–24CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brambilla M, Occhetta E, Ronconi M, Plebani L, Carriero A, Marino P (2010) Reducing operator radiation exposure during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clin Res 12:1769–1773 Brambilla M, Occhetta E, Ronconi M, Plebani L, Carriero A, Marino P (2010) Reducing operator radiation exposure during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clin Res 12:1769–1773
15.
go back to reference Murphy JC, Darragh K, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG (2011) Efficacy of the RADPAD protective drape during real world complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Am J Cardiol 108:1408–1410CrossRefPubMed Murphy JC, Darragh K, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG (2011) Efficacy of the RADPAD protective drape during real world complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Am J Cardiol 108:1408–1410CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference King JN, Champlin AM, Kelsey CA, Tripp DA (2002) Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists. Am J Roentgenol 178:153–157CrossRef King JN, Champlin AM, Kelsey CA, Tripp DA (2002) Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists. Am J Roentgenol 178:153–157CrossRef
17.
go back to reference McCaffrey JP, Tessier F, Shen H (2012) Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects to interventional radiology (IR) physicians. Med Phys 39:4537–4546CrossRefPubMed McCaffrey JP, Tessier F, Shen H (2012) Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects to interventional radiology (IR) physicians. Med Phys 39:4537–4546CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiation Protection Methods for the Interventionalist’s Hands: Use of an Extension Tube
Authors
Shaheen Dixon
Daniel Schick
John Harper
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0893-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2015 Go to the issue