Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Clinical Investigation

PET/CT-guided Interventions: Personnel Radiation Dose

Authors: E. Ronan Ryan, Raymond Thornton, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Meier Hsu, Brian Quinn, Lawrence T. Dauer, Stephen B. Solomon

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify radiation exposure to the primary operator and staff during PET/CT-guided interventional procedures.

Methods

In this prospective study, 12 patients underwent PET/CT-guided interventions over a 6 month period. Radiation exposure was measured for the primary operator, the radiology technologist, and the nurse anesthetist by means of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Radiation exposure was correlated with the procedure time and the use of in-room image guidance (CT fluoroscopy or ultrasound).

Results

The median effective dose was 0.02 (range 0–0.13) mSv for the primary operator, 0.01 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the nurse anesthetist, and 0.02 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the radiology technologist. The median extremity dose equivalent for the operator was 0.05 (range 0–0.62) mSv. Radiation exposure correlated with procedure duration and with the use of in-room image guidance. The median operator effective dose for the procedure was 0.015 mSv when conventional biopsy mode CT was used, compared to 0.06 mSv for in-room image guidance, although this did not achieve statistical significance as a result of the small sample size (p = 0.06).

Conclusion

The operator dose from PET/CT-guided procedures is not significantly different than typical doses from fluoroscopically guided procedures. The major determinant of radiation exposure to the operator from PET/CT-guided interventional procedures is time spent in close proximity to the patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferrucci JT Jr, Wittenberg J (1978) CT biopsy of abdominal tumors: aids for lesion localization. Radiology 129:739–744PubMed Ferrucci JT Jr, Wittenberg J (1978) CT biopsy of abdominal tumors: aids for lesion localization. Radiology 129:739–744PubMed
2.
go back to reference Rasmussen SN, Holm HH, Kristensen JK et al (1972) Ultrasonically-guided liver biopsy. Br Med J 2:500–502PubMedCrossRef Rasmussen SN, Holm HH, Kristensen JK et al (1972) Ultrasonically-guided liver biopsy. Br Med J 2:500–502PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM et al (1994) Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 190:721–725PubMed Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM et al (1994) Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 190:721–725PubMed
4.
go back to reference Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images—concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174PubMedCrossRef Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images—concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sato M, Watanabe Y, Tokui K et al (2000) CT-guided treatment of ultrasonically invisible hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2102–2106PubMedCrossRef Sato M, Watanabe Y, Tokui K et al (2000) CT-guided treatment of ultrasonically invisible hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2102–2106PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schoellnast H, Larson SM, Nehmeh SA et al (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung under real-time FDG PET CT guidance. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(suppl 2):S182–S185CrossRef Schoellnast H, Larson SM, Nehmeh SA et al (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung under real-time FDG PET CT guidance. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(suppl 2):S182–S185CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tatli S, Gerbaudo V, Feeley C et al (2011) PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:507–514PubMedCrossRef Tatli S, Gerbaudo V, Feeley C et al (2011) PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:507–514PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Valentin J (1998) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP 28:1–126CrossRef Valentin J (1998) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP 28:1–126CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Huang B, Law MWM, Khong PL (2009) Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251:166–174PubMedCrossRef Huang B, Law MWM, Khong PL (2009) Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251:166–174PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2011) Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2011) Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
11.
go back to reference Ahmed S, Zimmer A, McDonald N et al (2007) The effectiveness of lead aprons in reducing radiation exposures from specific radionuclides. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstr 48:470 Ahmed S, Zimmer A, McDonald N et al (2007) The effectiveness of lead aprons in reducing radiation exposures from specific radionuclides. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstr 48:470
12.
go back to reference Krücker J, Xu S, Venkatesan A et al (2011) Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:515–524PubMedCrossRef Krücker J, Xu S, Venkatesan A et al (2011) Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:515–524PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N et al (2011) Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology 260:848–856PubMedCrossRef Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N et al (2011) Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology 260:848–856PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khandani AH, Calvo BF, O’Neil BH et al (2007) A pilot study of early 18F-FDG PET to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1199–1202PubMedCrossRef Khandani AH, Calvo BF, O’Neil BH et al (2007) A pilot study of early 18F-FDG PET to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1199–1202PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR (2000) Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR (2000) Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York
16.
go back to reference Panuccio G, Greenberg RK, Wunderle K et al (2011) Comparison of indirect radiation dose estimates with directly measured radiation dose for patients and operators during complex endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 53:885–894PubMedCrossRef Panuccio G, Greenberg RK, Wunderle K et al (2011) Comparison of indirect radiation dose estimates with directly measured radiation dose for patients and operators during complex endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 53:885–894PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS et al (2001) CT fluoroscopy—guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 220:161–167PubMed Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS et al (2001) CT fluoroscopy—guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 220:161–167PubMed
18.
go back to reference Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD (1999) Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J Nucl Med 40:1352–1357PubMed Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD (1999) Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J Nucl Med 40:1352–1357PubMed
19.
go back to reference Madsen MT, Anderson JA, Halama JR et al; AAPM Task Group 108 (2006) PET and PET/CT shielding requirements. Med Phys 33:4–15CrossRef Madsen MT, Anderson JA, Halama JR et al; AAPM Task Group 108 (2006) PET and PET/CT shielding requirements. Med Phys 33:4–15CrossRef
Metadata
Title
PET/CT-guided Interventions: Personnel Radiation Dose
Authors
E. Ronan Ryan
Raymond Thornton
Constantinos T. Sofocleous
Joseph P. Erinjeri
Meier Hsu
Brian Quinn
Lawrence T. Dauer
Stephen B. Solomon
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0515-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2013 Go to the issue