Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Clinical Investigation

Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Insufficient Hemostasis Using the AngioSeal Vascular Closure Device After Antegrade Puncture

Authors: Peter Minko, Marcus Katoh, Stefan Gräber, Arno Buecker

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of the AngioSeal vascular closure device after antegrade puncture of the femoral artery.

Methods

In a prospective study, 120 consecutive patients underwent lower limb vascular intervention by an antegrade access to the common femoral artery (CFA). After intervention, a 6F (n = 88) or an 8F (n = 32) AngioSeal vascular closure device was used to achieve hemostasis. The technical success or the cause of failure was documented. In addition, the coagulation status (platelets, INR, prothrombin time, atrial thromboplastin time (PTT)), hypertonus, locoregional habitus of the groin, body mass index (BMI), presence of calcifications, and history of previous surgical interventions of the CFA were evaluated.

Results

Hemostasis was achieved in 97 patients (81%). In 12 patients (10%), persistent bleeding of the puncture site required manual compression. In another nine patients (8%) a kink of the sheath obviated the passage of the collagen plug toward the vessel, and in two patients the anchor dislodged out of the vessel, requiring manual compression. There were no significant differences between the groups of successful and unsuccessful sealing regarding the mean platelets (241 vs. 254 * 109/l; P = 0.86), INR (1.06 vs. 1.02; P = 0.52), prothrombin time (90% vs. 90%; P = 0.86), and PTT (30 vs. 31 s; P = 0.82). However, unsuccessful sealing was more likely in obese patients with an increased BMI (26.6 vs. 28.8 kg/m2; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Obesity seems to be an independent risk factor for insufficient sealing using the AngioSeal vascular closure device after antegrade puncture of the CFA. In 8% of our patients, hemostasis could not be achieved due to kink of the flexible sheath.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Looby S, Keeling AN, McErlean A et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(3):558–562PubMedCrossRef Looby S, Keeling AN, McErlean A et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(3):558–562PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ et al (2007) Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(2):182–188PubMedCrossRef Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ et al (2007) Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(2):182–188PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Das R, Ahmed K, Athanasiou T et al (2011) Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34(4):723–738PubMedCrossRef Das R, Ahmed K, Athanasiou T et al (2011) Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34(4):723–738PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nice C, Timmons G, Bartholemew P et al (2003) Retrograde vs. antegrade puncture for infra-inguinal angioplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26(4):370–374PubMedCrossRef Nice C, Timmons G, Bartholemew P et al (2003) Retrograde vs. antegrade puncture for infra-inguinal angioplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26(4):370–374PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Erb M et al (1999) Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of antegrade femoral arterial access sites in patients who have received full anticoagulation therapy. Radiology 210(1):47–52PubMed Duda SH, Wiskirchen J, Erb M et al (1999) Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of antegrade femoral arterial access sites in patients who have received full anticoagulation therapy. Radiology 210(1):47–52PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA (2005) Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol 56(3):409–412PubMedCrossRef Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA (2005) Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol 56(3):409–412PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Biondi-Zoccai GG, Fusaro M, Tashani A et al (2007) Angioseal use after antegrade femoral arteriotomy in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization for critical limb ischemia: a case series. Int J Cardiol 118(3):398–399PubMedCrossRef Biondi-Zoccai GG, Fusaro M, Tashani A et al (2007) Angioseal use after antegrade femoral arteriotomy in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization for critical limb ischemia: a case series. Int J Cardiol 118(3):398–399PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kapoor B, Panu A, Berscheid B (2007) Angio-seal in antegrade endovascular interventions: technical success and complications in a 55-patient series. J Endovasc Ther 14(3):382–386PubMedCrossRef Kapoor B, Panu A, Berscheid B (2007) Angio-seal in antegrade endovascular interventions: technical success and complications in a 55-patient series. J Endovasc Ther 14(3):382–386PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lupattelli T, Tannouri F, Garaci FG et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients. J Endovasc Ther 17(3):366–375PubMedCrossRef Lupattelli T, Tannouri F, Garaci FG et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients. J Endovasc Ther 17(3):366–375PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sacks D (2003) The TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on the management of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):351CrossRef Sacks D (2003) The TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on the management of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):351CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thurley PD, O’Neill R, Habib S et al (2008) Re: Looby et al. “Efficacy and safety of the Angioseal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture”. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(6):1255–1256PubMedCrossRef Thurley PD, O’Neill R, Habib S et al (2008) Re: Looby et al. “Efficacy and safety of the Angioseal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture”. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(6):1255–1256PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deuling JHH, Vermeulen RP, Anthonio RA et al (2008) Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71(4):518–523PubMedCrossRef Deuling JHH, Vermeulen RP, Anthonio RA et al (2008) Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71(4):518–523PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Insufficient Hemostasis Using the AngioSeal Vascular Closure Device After Antegrade Puncture
Authors
Peter Minko
Marcus Katoh
Stefan Gräber
Arno Buecker
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0230-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2012 Go to the issue