Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2010

01-10-2010 | Clinical Investigation

Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata: Optimization of the Radiation Dose to the Patient Using a Flat-Panel Detector Angiographic Suite

Authors: Marc Sapoval, Olivier Pellerin, Jean-Luc Rehel, Nicolas Houdoux, Ghizlaine Rahmoune, Bernard Aubert, Isabelle Fitton

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of low-dose/low-frame fluoroscopy/angiography with a flat-panel detector angiographic suite to reduce the dose delivered to patients during uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). A two-step prospective dosimetric study was conducted, with a flat-panel detector angiography suite (Siemens Axiom Artis) integrating automatic exposure control (AEC), during 20 consecutive UFEs. Patient dosimetry was performed using calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the lower posterior pelvis skin. The first step (10 patients; group A) consisted in UFE (bilateral embolization, calibrated microspheres) performed using the following parameters: standard fluoroscopy (15 pulses/s) and angiography (3 frames/s). The second step (next consecutive 10 patients; group B) used low-dose/low-frame fluoroscopy (7.5 pulses/s for catheterization and 3 pulses/s for embolization) and angiography (1 frame/s). We also recorded the total dose-area product (DAP) delivered to the patient and the fluoroscopy time as reported by the manufacturer’s dosimetry report. The mean peak skin dose decreased from 2.4 ± 1.3 to 0.4 ± 0.3 Gy (P = 0.001) for groups A and B, respectively. The DAP values decreased from 43,113 ± 27,207 μGy m² for group A to 9,515 ± 4,520 μGy m² for group B (P = 0.003). The dose to ovaries and uterus decreased from 378 ± 238 mGy (group A) to 83 ± 41 mGy (group B) and from 388 ± 246 mGy (group A) to 85 ± 39 mGy (group B), respectively. Effective doses decreased from 112 ± 71 mSv (group A) to 24 ± 12 mSv (group B) (P = 0.003). In conclusion, the use of low-dose/low-frame fluoroscopy/angiography, based on a good understanding of the AEC system and also on the technique during uterine fibroid embolization, allows a significant decrease in the dose exposure to the patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al (1995) Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346:671–672CrossRefPubMed Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al (1995) Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346:671–672CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Goodwin SC, Walker WJ (1998) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10(4):315–320CrossRefPubMed Goodwin SC, Walker WJ (1998) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10(4):315–320CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference American College of Radiology and the Radiological Society of North America (2008) Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). RSNA, November 14 American College of Radiology and the Radiological Society of North America (2008) Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). RSNA, November 14
4.
go back to reference Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z et al (2008) Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 31:73–85CrossRef Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z et al (2008) Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 31:73–85CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ et al (2000) Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 214:121–125PubMed Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ et al (2000) Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 214:121–125PubMed
6.
go back to reference Glomset O, Hellesnes J, Heimland N et al (2006) Assessment of organ radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Acta Radiol 47(2):179–185CrossRefPubMed Glomset O, Hellesnes J, Heimland N et al (2006) Assessment of organ radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Acta Radiol 47(2):179–185CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nikolic B, Abbara S, Levy E et al (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. JVIR 11:1173–1178PubMed Nikolic B, Abbara S, Levy E et al (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. JVIR 11:1173–1178PubMed
8.
go back to reference Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP et al (2004) Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose. Eur Radiol 14(5):842–848CrossRefPubMed Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP et al (2004) Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose. Eur Radiol 14(5):842–848CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP et al (2005) Optimisation strategies and justification: an example in uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. Radiat Prot Dosim 117(1–3):50–53 Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP et al (2005) Optimisation strategies and justification: an example in uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. Radiat Prot Dosim 117(1–3):50–53
10.
go back to reference Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF et al (1994) Normalised organ doses for medical X-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB-SR262. NRPB, Chilton Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF et al (1994) Normalised organ doses for medical X-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB-SR262. NRPB, Chilton
11.
go back to reference Bratby MJ, Ramachandran N, Sheppard N et al (2007) Prospective study of elective bilateral versus unilateral femoral arterial puncture for uterine artery embolization. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(6):1139–1143CrossRef Bratby MJ, Ramachandran N, Sheppard N et al (2007) Prospective study of elective bilateral versus unilateral femoral arterial puncture for uterine artery embolization. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(6):1139–1143CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA (1994) Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. JVIR 5:71–84PubMed Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA (1994) Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. JVIR 5:71–84PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chrisman HB, Saker MB, Ryu RK et al (2000) The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function. JVIR 11:699–703PubMed Chrisman HB, Saker MB, Ryu RK et al (2000) The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function. JVIR 11:699–703PubMed
14.
go back to reference Horning SJ, Hoppe RT, Kaplan HS et al (1981) Female reproductive potential after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 23:1377–1382CrossRef Horning SJ, Hoppe RT, Kaplan HS et al (1981) Female reproductive potential after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 23:1377–1382CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ray GR, Trueblood HW, Enright LP et al (1970) Oophoropexy: a means of preserving ovarian function following pelvic megavoltage radiotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. Radiology 96:175–180PubMed Ray GR, Trueblood HW, Enright LP et al (1970) Oophoropexy: a means of preserving ovarian function following pelvic megavoltage radiotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. Radiology 96:175–180PubMed
16.
go back to reference Thomas PRM, Winstanly D, Peckham MJ et al (1976) Reproductive and endocrine function in patients with Hodgkin’s disease: effects of oophoropexy and irradiation. Br J Cancer 33:226–231PubMed Thomas PRM, Winstanly D, Peckham MJ et al (1976) Reproductive and endocrine function in patients with Hodgkin’s disease: effects of oophoropexy and irradiation. Br J Cancer 33:226–231PubMed
Metadata
Title
Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata: Optimization of the Radiation Dose to the Patient Using a Flat-Panel Detector Angiographic Suite
Authors
Marc Sapoval
Olivier Pellerin
Jean-Luc Rehel
Nicolas Houdoux
Ghizlaine Rahmoune
Bernard Aubert
Isabelle Fitton
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9795-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue