Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2007

01-07-2007

StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice

Authors: Atique Imam, Ranjana M. S. Carter, Jane Phillips-Hughes, Philip Boardman, Raman Uberoi

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The StarClose device (Abbott Vascular Devices; Abbott Laboratories, Redwood City, CA) utilizes an externally placed Nitinol clip to achieve arterial closure following femoral artery puncture. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and complications of the StarClose device in patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures. Preprocedural clotting status, pulse and blood pressure, severity of vessel calcification, sheath size, and time to deployment were recorded. Postdeployment complications immediately postprocedure, at 1 h, at 2 h, and at 1 week were recorded. A duplex scan was performed in the first 10 patients to assess any immediate vascular complications. Deployments were successful in 96% achieving immediate hemostasis. Mean deployment time was 48 s. There were no major complications. The StarClose device was found to have a high technical and clinical efficacy.
Literature
1.
Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST (1999) Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J 138(6; Pt 1):1118–1125PubMedCrossRef
2.
Bogart MA (1995) Time to hemostasis: |a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery. Am J Crit Care 4(2):149–156PubMed
3.
Thore V, Berder V, Houplon P, et al. (2001) Role of manual compression time and bed rest duration on the occurrence of femoral bleeding complications after sheath retrieval following 4fr left-sided cardiac catheterization. J Interv Cardiol 14(1):7–10PubMedCrossRef
4.
Tagney J, Lackie D (2005) Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal: What is safe practice? A clinical audit. Nurs Crit Care 10(4):167–173PubMedCrossRef
5.
Eggebrecht H, Haude M, Woertgen U, et al. (2002) Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(4):486–495PubMedCrossRef
6.
Silber S (2000) Ten years of arterial closure devices: a critical analysis of their use after PTCA. Z Kardiol 89(5):383–389PubMedCrossRef
7.
Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. (2004) Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291:350–357PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hoffer EK, Bloch RD (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:865–886PubMed
9.
Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, et al. (1993) A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1273–1279PubMedCrossRef
10.
Chamberlin JR, Lardi AB, McKeever LS, et al. (1999) Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47:143–147PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, et al. (2002) Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 55:8–13CrossRef
12.
Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, et al. (1998) Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Invest. Am J Cardiol 81:569–572PubMedCrossRef
13.
Abando A, Hood D, Weaver F, et al. (2004) The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. J Vasc Surg 40(2):287–290PubMedCrossRef
14.
Belenky A, Aranovich D, Greif F, et al. (2007) Use of a collagen-based device for closure of low brachial artery punctures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):273–275CrossRef
15.
Starnes BW, O’Donnell SD, Gillespie DL, et al. (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg 38(2):263–271PubMedCrossRef
16.
Juergens CP, Leung DY, Crozier JA, et al. (2004) Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63(2):166–170PubMedCrossRef
17.
Abbot Laboratories (2005) StarClose vascular closure system, instructions for use. Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, CA, p 2
18.
Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. (2006) Incidence of vascular injuries after use of the Angio-Seal closure device following endovascular procedures in a single center. World J Surg 30(3):280–284PubMedCrossRef
19.
Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA (2005) Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol 56(3):409–412PubMedCrossRef
20.
Kirchhof C, Schickel S, Schmidt-Lucke C, et al. (2002) Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device Angio-Seal. Vasa 31(2):101–106PubMedCrossRef
21.
Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, et al. (2006) Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 20(2):278–281PubMedCrossRef
22.
Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, et al. (2001) Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52(1):3–7, discussion 8PubMedCrossRef
23.
Jang JJ, Kim M, Gray B, et al. (2006) Claudication secondary to Perclose use after percutaneous procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(5):687–695PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice
Authors
Atique Imam
Ranjana M. S. Carter
Jane Phillips-Hughes
Philip Boardman
Raman Uberoi
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9079-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2007 Go to the issue

Technical Note

Development of a New Support Method for Transpedicular Punctures of the Vertebral Body: The Isocenter Puncture Method

Technical Note

Use of the Amplatzer Vascular Plug as a Coil Constrainer During Endovascular Occlusion of a Dialysis Shunt

Case Report

Ruptured Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysm: Staged Emergency Endovascular Treatment in the Interventional Radiology Suite

Clinical Investigation

Use of Nitinol Stents Following Recanalization of Central Venous Occlusions in Hemodialysis Patients

Review

The Current Role of Venous Sampling in the Localization of Endocrine Disease

Clinical Investigation

Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination with Embolization in Metachronous Recurrent Renal Cancer in Solitary Kidney after Contralateral Tumor Nephrectomy