Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2021

Open Access 01-05-2021 | Breast Cancer | Original Scientific Report

Cosmetic Outcomes and Symmetry Comparison in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Therapeutic Mammoplasty for Breast Cancer

Authors: K. Gulis, L. Rydén, P. O. Bendahl, T. Svensjö

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast-reduction techniques are increasingly used in oncoplastic breast surgery. Bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty has the benefit of decreasing breast volume, enabling resection of larger tumors, and the potential to assure good postoperative symmetry. The aims of this study were to objectively asses the cosmetic outcomes of therapeutic mammoplasty in patients with breast cancer, using the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT.core) software, to compare this score with the surgeon’s score and the patient’s assessment, and to evaluate if other defined parameters have an impact on cosmetic outcomes. The secondary aim was to compare breast symmetry pre- and postoperatively.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 146 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer who underwent therapeutic mammoplasty between 2011 and 2018 in Kristianstad Central Hospital, Sweden. We retrospectively collected data from patients’ records. We analyzed the BCCT.core score using postoperative photographs to objectively evaluate cosmetic outcomes on a four-grade scale and compared with preoperative photographs to evaluate symmetry. Cosmetic outcomes were also assessed subjectively by patients and surgeons, using a 10-point Likert scale.

Results

The majority of patients (89%) had good or excellent BCCT.core scores, which correlated with surgeons’ scores, rs =  − 0.22 (p < 0.001). Overall, patients were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes than the surgeons (p < 0.001). Evidence supporting an association between the defined clinicopathological variables, for example, tumor size, and cosmetic outcomes, was weak.

Conclusion

Therapeutic mammoplasty yields a very good cosmetic outcome, evaluated both by subjective and objective measurements. Importantly, symmetry can be improved in patients with asymmetry.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kosasih S, Tayeh S, Mokbel K et al (2020) Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg 220(2):385–392CrossRef Kosasih S, Tayeh S, Mokbel K et al (2020) Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg 220(2):385–392CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Papanikolaou IG, Dimitrakakis C, Zagouri F et al (2019) Paving the way for changing perceptions in breast surgery: a systematic literature review focused on oncological and aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 26(4):416–427CrossRef Papanikolaou IG, Dimitrakakis C, Zagouri F et al (2019) Paving the way for changing perceptions in breast surgery: a systematic literature review focused on oncological and aesthetic outcomes of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 26(4):416–427CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Campbell EJ, Romics L (2017) Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 9:521–530 Campbell EJ, Romics L (2017) Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 9:521–530
4.
go back to reference De Lorenzi F, Hubner G, Rotmensz N, Bagnardi V et al (2016) Oncological results of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: Long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution: A matchedcohort analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(1):71–77CrossRef De Lorenzi F, Hubner G, Rotmensz N, Bagnardi V et al (2016) Oncological results of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: Long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution: A matchedcohort analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(1):71–77CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty–Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg 58(7):889–901CrossRef McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty–Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg 58(7):889–901CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Therapeutic mammaplasty–analysis of 50 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 58(7):902–907CrossRef McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Therapeutic mammaplasty–analysis of 50 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 58(7):902–907CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Di Micco R, O’Connell RL, Barry PA et al (2017) Bilateral mammoplasty for cancer: Surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 43(1):68–75CrossRef Di Micco R, O’Connell RL, Barry PA et al (2017) Bilateral mammoplasty for cancer: Surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 43(1):68–75CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Piper ML, Esserman LJ, Sbitany H et al (2016) Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 3):S222–S226CrossRef Piper ML, Esserman LJ, Sbitany H et al (2016) Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 3):S222–S226CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A et al (2019) A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3133–3140CrossRef Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A et al (2019) A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3133–3140CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ratosa I, Jenko A, Oblak I (2018) Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiol Oncol 52(3):233–244CrossRef Ratosa I, Jenko A, Oblak I (2018) Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiol Oncol 52(3):233–244CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Panhofer P, Ferenc V, Schutz M et al (2014) Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification. Int J Surg 12(4):334–339CrossRef Panhofer P, Ferenc V, Schutz M et al (2014) Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification. Int J Surg 12(4):334–339CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15(5):625–632CrossRef Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15(5):625–632CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hansson E, Manjer J, Ringberg A (2014) Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(4):254–258CrossRef Hansson E, Manjer J, Ringberg A (2014) Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(4):254–258CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ (2007) Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 40(2):115–126CrossRef Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ (2007) Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 40(2):115–126CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N et al (2007) Turning subjective into objective: The BCCT core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. The Breast. 16(5):456–461CrossRef Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N et al (2007) Turning subjective into objective: The BCCT core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. The Breast. 16(5):456–461CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fabry HFJ, Zonderhuis BM, Meijer S, Berkhof J et al (2005) Cosmetic outcome of breast conserving therapy after sentinel node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92(2):157CrossRef Fabry HFJ, Zonderhuis BM, Meijer S, Berkhof J et al (2005) Cosmetic outcome of breast conserving therapy after sentinel node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92(2):157CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Emiroglu M, Karaali C, Salimoglu S et al (2016) Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty for breast cancer in women with macromastia: long term aesthetic, functional and satisfaction outcomes. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 20(3):256–260 Emiroglu M, Karaali C, Salimoglu S et al (2016) Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty for breast cancer in women with macromastia: long term aesthetic, functional and satisfaction outcomes. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 20(3):256–260
19.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda EG et al (2006) Critical analysis of reduction mammaplasty techniques in combination with conservative breast surgery for early breast cancer treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 117(4):1091–1103 (discussion 104-7)CrossRef Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda EG et al (2006) Critical analysis of reduction mammaplasty techniques in combination with conservative breast surgery for early breast cancer treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 117(4):1091–1103 (discussion 104-7)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Santos G, Urban C, Edelweiss MI et al (2015) Long-Term comparison of aesthetical outcomes after oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22(8):2500–2508CrossRef Santos G, Urban C, Edelweiss MI et al (2015) Long-Term comparison of aesthetical outcomes after oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22(8):2500–2508CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vella Baldacchino R, Bellizzi A, Madada-Nyakauru RN et al (2019) Assessment of breast symmetry in breast cancer patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty using the Breast Cancer Conservation Therapy cosmetic results software (BCCT core). Gland Surg. 8(3):218–225CrossRef Vella Baldacchino R, Bellizzi A, Madada-Nyakauru RN et al (2019) Assessment of breast symmetry in breast cancer patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty using the Breast Cancer Conservation Therapy cosmetic results software (BCCT core). Gland Surg. 8(3):218–225CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Di Micco R, O’Connell RL, Barry PA et al (2017) Standard wide local excision or bilateral reduction mammoplasty in large-breasted women with small tumours: Surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(4):636–641CrossRef Di Micco R, O’Connell RL, Barry PA et al (2017) Standard wide local excision or bilateral reduction mammoplasty in large-breasted women with small tumours: Surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(4):636–641CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J et al (2019) Outcomes of Breast Reduction Surgery Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Study and Comparison with Normative Data. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(5):1034–1044CrossRef Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J et al (2019) Outcomes of Breast Reduction Surgery Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Study and Comparison with Normative Data. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(5):1034–1044CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Losken A, Hart AM, Broecker JS et al (2017) Oncoplastic Breast Reduction Technique and Outcomes: An Evolution over 20 Years. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(4):824e-e833CrossRef Losken A, Hart AM, Broecker JS et al (2017) Oncoplastic Breast Reduction Technique and Outcomes: An Evolution over 20 Years. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(4):824e-e833CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sanchez AM, Franceschini G, D’Archi S et al (2020) Results obtained with level II oncoplastic surgery spanning 20 years of breast cancer treatment: Do we really need further demonstration of reliability? Breast J 26(2):125–132CrossRef Sanchez AM, Franceschini G, D’Archi S et al (2020) Results obtained with level II oncoplastic surgery spanning 20 years of breast cancer treatment: Do we really need further demonstration of reliability? Breast J 26(2):125–132CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dahlback C, Ullmark JH, Rehn M et al (2017) Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment Swedish women evaluated with BCCT core and BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164(3):679–87CrossRef Dahlback C, Ullmark JH, Rehn M et al (2017) Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment Swedish women evaluated with BCCT core and BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164(3):679–87CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cosmetic Outcomes and Symmetry Comparison in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Therapeutic Mammoplasty for Breast Cancer
Authors
K. Gulis
L. Rydén
P. O. Bendahl
T. Svensjö
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05941-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

World Journal of Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue