Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Ultrasound | Original Scientific Report

Recommendation for Photographic Documentation of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors: Maciej Sebastian, Agata Sebastian, Jerzy Rudnicki

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bile duct injury and vasculobiliary injury are possible complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy which can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, costs of hospitalization and litigation. Proper documentation of the critical view of safety and safe plane of dissection may play a crucial role for archivization, teaching and medicolegal purposes.

Methods

The study group consisted of 100 patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The critical view of safety was documented on two photographs and safe plain of dissection obtained with laparoscopic ultrasound was documented on one photograph as well as the whole procedure was recorded. The photographs were printed in the operating theatre and videos were stored on an external hard drive.

Results

The mean time to obtain and analyse photographs was significantly shorter than video, and the size of the stored data was significantly smaller for photographs than videos. The cost of one documentation procedure was significantly lower for video than photographs. Critical view of safety was obtained in 91 patients, and laparoscopic ultrasound was successful in 99 patients. The conversion rate was 2%, and fundus-first cholecystectomies were performed in 6% of patients. We did not observe any biliary and vascular complications.

Conclusions

Photographic documentation of the critical view of safety and safe plane of dissection should be an inherent part of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our proposal of documentation prepared in the operating theatre and stored in the patient’s documentation is an example of an easy, fast and cheap method of data archivization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Conrad C, Wakabayashi G, Asbun HJ et al (2017) IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(11):603–615CrossRef Conrad C, Wakabayashi G, Asbun HJ et al (2017) IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(11):603–615CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N et al (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(4):429–453CrossRef Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N et al (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(4):429–453CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J et al (2016) Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 30(6):2239–2243CrossRef Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J et al (2016) Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 30(6):2239–2243CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mangieri CW, Hendren BP, Strode MA et al (2019) Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era. Surg Endosc 33(3):724–730CrossRef Mangieri CW, Hendren BP, Strode MA et al (2019) Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era. Surg Endosc 33(3):724–730CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schreuder AM, Busch OR, Besselink MG et al (2020) Long-term impact of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Dig Surg 37(1):10–21CrossRef Schreuder AM, Busch OR, Besselink MG et al (2020) Long-term impact of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Dig Surg 37(1):10–21CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rothman JP, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC et al (2015) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark has improved over 6-year period. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(6):735–740CrossRef Rothman JP, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC et al (2015) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark has improved over 6-year period. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(6):735–740CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2017) The critical view of safety: why it is not the only method of ductal identification within the standard of care in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 265(3):464–465CrossRef Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2017) The critical view of safety: why it is not the only method of ductal identification within the standard of care in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 265(3):464–465CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dili A, Bertrand C (2017) Laparoscopic ultrasonography as an alternative to intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 23(29):5438–5450CrossRef Dili A, Bertrand C (2017) Laparoscopic ultrasonography as an alternative to intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 23(29):5438–5450CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2017) A perspective on the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2:91CrossRef Strasberg SM (2017) A perspective on the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2:91CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lam T, Usatoff V, Chan ST (2014) Are we getting the critical view? a prospective study of photographic documentation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 16(9):859–863CrossRef Lam T, Usatoff V, Chan ST (2014) Are we getting the critical view? a prospective study of photographic documentation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 16(9):859–863CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buddingh KT, Morks AN, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO et al (2012) Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(1):79–85CrossRef Buddingh KT, Morks AN, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO et al (2012) Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(1):79–85CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mascagni P, Fiorillo C, Urade T et al (2020) Formalizing video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety. Surg Endosc 34(6):2709–2714CrossRef Mascagni P, Fiorillo C, Urade T et al (2020) Formalizing video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety. Surg Endosc 34(6):2709–2714CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barrett M, Asbun HJ, Chien HL et al (2018) Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement. Surg Endosc 32(4):1683–1688CrossRef Barrett M, Asbun HJ, Chien HL et al (2018) Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement. Surg Endosc 32(4):1683–1688CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sanford DE, Strasberg SM (2014) A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative “doublet” photography. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):170–178CrossRef Sanford DE, Strasberg SM (2014) A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative “doublet” photography. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):170–178CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Ohyama T et al (2017) Delphi consensus on bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evolutionary cul-de-sac or the birth pangs of a new technical framework? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(11):591–602CrossRef Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Ohyama T et al (2017) Delphi consensus on bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evolutionary cul-de-sac or the birth pangs of a new technical framework? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24(11):591–602CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z et al (2009) One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):498–503CrossRef Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z et al (2009) One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):498–503CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Helton WS (2011) An analytical review of vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 13(1):1–14CrossRef Strasberg SM, Helton WS (2011) An analytical review of vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 13(1):1–14CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA et al (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215(3):196–202CrossRef Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA et al (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215(3):196–202CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Gouma DJ (2012) ‘Extreme’ vasculobiliary injuries: association with fundus-down cholecystectomy in severely inflamed gallbladders. HPB (Oxford) 14(1):1–8CrossRef Strasberg SM, Gouma DJ (2012) ‘Extreme’ vasculobiliary injuries: association with fundus-down cholecystectomy in severely inflamed gallbladders. HPB (Oxford) 14(1):1–8CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M (2008) Dissection of the gallbladder from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or subacute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15(3):293–296CrossRef Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M (2008) Dissection of the gallbladder from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or subacute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15(3):293–296CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M et al (2009) The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):445–449CrossRef Honda G, Iwanaga T, Kurata M et al (2009) The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):445–449CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Singh R, Brunt LM (2018) Critical view of safety-its feasibility and efficacy in preventing bile duct injuries. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 3:2CrossRef Singh R, Brunt LM (2018) Critical view of safety-its feasibility and efficacy in preventing bile duct injuries. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 3:2CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRef Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251(4):682–685CrossRef Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251(4):682–685CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Recommendation for Photographic Documentation of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Authors
Maciej Sebastian
Agata Sebastian
Jerzy Rudnicki
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05776-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue