Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

A Low-Cost Synthetic Abdominal Wall Model (“Raj Model”) for the Training of Laparoscopic Port Insertion

Authors: Mithun Kailavasan, Christopher Berridge, Gokul Kandaswamy, Bhavan Rai, Beverley Wilkinson, Sunjay Jain, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Basavaraj Gowda

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the content validity of a low-cost bench-top model (“Raj Model”) for the training of laparoscopic port insertion at the Urology Simulation Bootcamp course (USBC).

Materials and methods

A low-cost abdominal wall model of 40 × 40 cm was created to simulate laparoscopic port placement. The model was made using different synthetic materials to represent layers (skin—vinyl sheet, subcutaneous fat—10 mm soft foam, anterior rectus sheath and muscle—floor mat, posterior rectus sheath—masking wall tape, peritoneum—sellotape). Each model was used by up to 3 trainees to practise laparoscopic port placement. The model was assessed for content validity by trainees and experts using a 5-point Likert scale.

Result

In total, 88 trainees and 6 experts participated in the study. For all aspects of the synthetic abdominal wall, good (4) or very good (5) scores ranged from 52.7–69.2%, whereas very poor (1) rating ranged from 0 to 4.3%. There was no significant difference in responses for the content validity of the model between trainees and experts. There was a high intraclass correlation amongst responses from trainees (0.89) and experts (0.79). Approximately 76.3% of trainees and experts felt that the model is suitable for training.

Conclusion

This is the first validation study of a low-cost abdominal wall model for teaching laparoscopic port placement for trainees. Our study demonstrates that this synthetic model has high content validity and is useful for surgical training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giles JA (2010) Surgical training and the European working time directive: the role of informal workplace learning. Int J Surg 8(3):179–180CrossRef Giles JA (2010) Surgical training and the European working time directive: the role of informal workplace learning. Int J Surg 8(3):179–180CrossRef
2.
go back to reference England RCoSo (2015) Improving surgical training: proposal for pilot surgical training programme, pp 12–13 England RCoSo (2015) Improving surgical training: proposal for pilot surgical training programme, pp 12–13
3.
go back to reference Flanders D, Pirpiris A, Corcoran N, Forsyth R, Grills R (2019) Lessons learned and new challenges: re-evaluation of end-user assessment of a skills-based training program for urology trainees. J Med Educ Curric Dev 6:2382120519834552CrossRef Flanders D, Pirpiris A, Corcoran N, Forsyth R, Grills R (2019) Lessons learned and new challenges: re-evaluation of end-user assessment of a skills-based training program for urology trainees. J Med Educ Curric Dev 6:2382120519834552CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pena G, Altree M, Field J, Sainsbury D, Babidge W, Hewett P et al (2015) Nontechnical skills training for the operating room: a prospective study using simulation and didactic workshop. Surgery 158(1):300–309CrossRef Pena G, Altree M, Field J, Sainsbury D, Babidge W, Hewett P et al (2015) Nontechnical skills training for the operating room: a prospective study using simulation and didactic workshop. Surgery 158(1):300–309CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brewin J, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2014) Face, content, and construct validation of the Bristol TURP trainer. J Surg Educ 71(4):500–505CrossRef Brewin J, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2014) Face, content, and construct validation of the Bristol TURP trainer. J Surg Educ 71(4):500–505CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D et al (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243(3):291–300CrossRef Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D et al (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243(3):291–300CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Young M, Kailavasan M, Taylor J, Cornford P, Colquhoun A, Rochester M et al (2019) The success and evolution of a urological “Boot Camp” for newly appointed UK urology registrars: incorporating simulation, nontechnical skills and assessment. J Surg Educ 76(5):1425–1432CrossRef Young M, Kailavasan M, Taylor J, Cornford P, Colquhoun A, Rochester M et al (2019) The success and evolution of a urological “Boot Camp” for newly appointed UK urology registrars: incorporating simulation, nontechnical skills and assessment. J Surg Educ 76(5):1425–1432CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tan SC, Marlow N, Field J, Altree M, Babidge W, Hewett P et al (2012) A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 26(11):3207–3214CrossRef Tan SC, Marlow N, Field J, Altree M, Babidge W, Hewett P et al (2012) A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 26(11):3207–3214CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Steigerwald SN, Park J, Hardy KM, Gillman LM, Vergis AS (2015) Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics. Am J Surg 209(1):34–39CrossRef Steigerwald SN, Park J, Hardy KM, Gillman LM, Vergis AS (2015) Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics. Am J Surg 209(1):34–39CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schout BM, Hendrikx AJ, Scheele F, Bemelmans BL, Scherpbier AJ (2010) Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future. Surg Endosc 24(3):536–546CrossRef Schout BM, Hendrikx AJ, Scheele F, Bemelmans BL, Scherpbier AJ (2010) Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future. Surg Endosc 24(3):536–546CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Low-Cost Synthetic Abdominal Wall Model (“Raj Model”) for the Training of Laparoscopic Port Insertion
Authors
Mithun Kailavasan
Christopher Berridge
Gokul Kandaswamy
Bhavan Rai
Beverley Wilkinson
Sunjay Jain
Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Basavaraj Gowda
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05354-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

World Journal of Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue