Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2020

Open Access 01-04-2020 | Original Scientific Report

Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons

Authors: Samuel G. Parker, Steve Halligan, Mike K. Liang, Filip E. Muysoms, Gina L. Adrales, Adam Boutall, Andrew C. de Beaux, Ulrich A. Dietz, Celia M. Divino, Mary T. Hawn, Todd B. Heniford, Joon P. Hong, Nabeel Ibrahim, Kamal M. F. Itani, Lars N. Jorgensen, Agneta Montgomery, Salvador Morales-Conde, Yohann Renard, David L. Sanders, Neil J. Smart, Jared J. Torkington, Alastair C. J. Windsor

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for ‘loss of domain’ (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdominal wall surgeons.

Methods

A Delphi study involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons was performed. Four written and two volumetric definitions of LOD were identified via systematic review. Panelists completed a questionnaire that suggested these definitions as standardized definitions of LOD. Consensus on a preferred term was pre-defined as achieved when selected by ≥80% of panelists. Terms scoring <20% were removed.

Results

Voting commenced August 2018 and was completed in January 2019. Written definition: During Round 1, two definitions were removed and seven new definitions were suggested, leaving nine definitions for consideration. For Round 2, panelists were asked to select all appealing definitions. Thereafter, common concepts were identified during analysis, from which the facilitators advanced a new written definition. This received 100% agreement in Round 3. Volumetric definition: Initially, panelists were evenly split, but consensus for the Sabbagh method was achieved. Panelists could not reach consensus regarding a threshold LOD value that would preclude surgery.

Conclusions

Consensus for written and volumetric definitions of LOD was achieved from 20 internationally recognized AWR surgeons. Adoption of these definitions will help standardize the use of LOD for both clinical and academic activities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shelton J, Poulose BK, Phillips S et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRef Shelton J, Poulose BK, Phillips S et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hospital Episode Statistics (2017) UK ventral hernia data: Report on request Hospital Episode Statistics (2017) UK ventral hernia data: Report on request
3.
go back to reference Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S (2008) The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature 451:716–719CrossRef Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S (2008) The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature 451:716–719CrossRef
4.
go back to reference The Royal College of Physicians (2004) Storing up problems: the medical case for a slimmer nation The Royal College of Physicians (2004) Storing up problems: the medical case for a slimmer nation
5.
go back to reference Soop M, Carlson GL (2017) Recent developments in the surgical management of complex intra-abdominal infection. Br J Surg 104(2):e65–e74CrossRef Soop M, Carlson GL (2017) Recent developments in the surgical management of complex intra-abdominal infection. Br J Surg 104(2):e65–e74CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Watson MJ, Kundu N, Coppa C et al (2013) Role of tissue expanders in patients with loss of abdominal domain awaiting intestinal transplantation. Transpl Int 26(12):1184–1190CrossRef Watson MJ, Kundu N, Coppa C et al (2013) Role of tissue expanders in patients with loss of abdominal domain awaiting intestinal transplantation. Transpl Int 26(12):1184–1190CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Poruk KE, Farrow N, Azar F et al (2016) Effect of hernia size on operative repair and post-operative outcomes after open ventral hernia repair. Hernia 20(6):805–810CrossRef Poruk KE, Farrow N, Azar F et al (2016) Effect of hernia size on operative repair and post-operative outcomes after open ventral hernia repair. Hernia 20(6):805–810CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fiore JF, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L et al (2012) Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the delphi technique. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):416–423CrossRef Fiore JF, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L et al (2012) Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the delphi technique. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):416–423CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rowe G, Wright G (1999) The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecast 15:353–375CrossRef Rowe G, Wright G (1999) The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecast 15:353–375CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al (2011) Using and reporting the delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20476CrossRef Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al (2011) Using and reporting the delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20476CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jorm A (2015) Using the delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. ANZJP 49(10):887–897PubMed Jorm A (2015) Using the delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. ANZJP 49(10):887–897PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mull HJ, Graham LA, Morris MS et al (2018) Association of postoperative readmissions with surgical quality using a delphi consensus process to identify relevant diagnosis codes. JAMA Surg 153(8):728–737CrossRef Mull HJ, Graham LA, Morris MS et al (2018) Association of postoperative readmissions with surgical quality using a delphi consensus process to identify relevant diagnosis codes. JAMA Surg 153(8):728–737CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tanaka EY, Yoo JH, Rodrigues AJ Jr et al (2010) A computerized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in complex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia 14:63–69CrossRef Tanaka EY, Yoo JH, Rodrigues AJ Jr et al (2010) A computerized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in complex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia 14:63–69CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Robert B et al (2011) Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study. Hernia 15:559–565CrossRef Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Robert B et al (2011) Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study. Hernia 15:559–565CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tierman J, Cook A, Geh I et al (2014) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 16:965–970CrossRef Tierman J, Cook A, Geh I et al (2014) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 16:965–970CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schneider P, Evaniew N, Rendon JS et al (2016) Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. BMJ Open 6(5):e011780CrossRef Schneider P, Evaniew N, Rendon JS et al (2016) Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. BMJ Open 6(5):e011780CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schumpelick V, Kingsnorth AN (1999) Panel discussions: classification. In: Schumpelick V, Kingsnorth AN (eds) Incisional Hernia. Springer, Berlin, pp 491–492CrossRef Schumpelick V, Kingsnorth AN (1999) Panel discussions: classification. In: Schumpelick V, Kingsnorth AN (eds) Incisional Hernia. Springer, Berlin, pp 491–492CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Narbenhernie Schumpelick V (2000) In: Schumpelick V (ed) Hernien. Thieme Publishing p, Stuttgart, pp 266–269 Narbenhernie Schumpelick V (2000) In: Schumpelick V (ed) Hernien. Thieme Publishing p, Stuttgart, pp 266–269
21.
go back to reference Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4(1):7–11CrossRef Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4(1):7–11CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S et al (2001) Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia; results of an expert meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386(1):65–73CrossRef Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S et al (2001) Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia; results of an expert meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386(1):65–73CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS et al (2007) An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. JPRAS 60:383–388PubMed Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS et al (2007) An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. JPRAS 60:383–388PubMed
24.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414CrossRef Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S et al (2000) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558CrossRef Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S et al (2000) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA et al (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793CrossRef Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA et al (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Petro CC, Rourke CPO, Criss CN et al (2016) Designing a ventral hernia staging system. Hernia 20:111–117CrossRef Petro CC, Rourke CPO, Criss CN et al (2016) Designing a ventral hernia staging system. Hernia 20:111–117CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18:7–17CrossRef Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18:7–17CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Poruk KE, Hicks CW, Trent Magruder J et al (2017) Creation of a novel risk score for surgical site infection and occurrence after ventral hernia repair. Hernia 21(2):261–269CrossRef Poruk KE, Hicks CW, Trent Magruder J et al (2017) Creation of a novel risk score for surgical site infection and occurrence after ventral hernia repair. Hernia 21(2):261–269CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC et al (2013) Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):974–982CrossRef Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC et al (2013) Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):974–982CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mitchell TO, Holihan JL, Askenasy EP et al (2016) Do risk calculators accurately predict surgical site occurrences? J Surg Res 203(1):56–63CrossRef Mitchell TO, Holihan JL, Askenasy EP et al (2016) Do risk calculators accurately predict surgical site occurrences? J Surg Res 203(1):56–63CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Liang MK, Goodenough CJ, Martindale RG et al (2015) External validation of the ventral hernia risk score for prediction of surgical site infections. Surg Infect 16(1):36–40CrossRef Liang MK, Goodenough CJ, Martindale RG et al (2015) External validation of the ventral hernia risk score for prediction of surgical site infections. Surg Infect 16(1):36–40CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Baucom RB, Ousley J, Oyefule OO et al (2015) Incisional hernia classification predicts wound complications two years after repair. Am Surg 81(7):679–686PubMed Baucom RB, Ousley J, Oyefule OO et al (2015) Incisional hernia classification predicts wound complications two years after repair. Am Surg 81(7):679–686PubMed
34.
go back to reference Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216(2):217–228CrossRef Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216(2):217–228CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Vidovic D, Jurisic D, Franjic B et al (2006) Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 10(4):322–325CrossRef Vidovic D, Jurisic D, Franjic B et al (2006) Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 10(4):322–325CrossRef
36.
go back to reference NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390:2627–2642CrossRef NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390:2627–2642CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A et al (2017) Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: a systematic review and meta- analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord 16:21CrossRef Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A et al (2017) Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: a systematic review and meta- analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord 16:21CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Gyedu A, Stewart B, Wadie R et al (2019) Population-based rates of hernia surgery in Ghana. Hernia Aug. 1–7 Gyedu A, Stewart B, Wadie R et al (2019) Population-based rates of hernia surgery in Ghana. Hernia Aug. 1–7
Metadata
Title
Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons
Authors
Samuel G. Parker
Steve Halligan
Mike K. Liang
Filip E. Muysoms
Gina L. Adrales
Adam Boutall
Andrew C. de Beaux
Ulrich A. Dietz
Celia M. Divino
Mary T. Hawn
Todd B. Heniford
Joon P. Hong
Nabeel Ibrahim
Kamal M. F. Itani
Lars N. Jorgensen
Agneta Montgomery
Salvador Morales-Conde
Yohann Renard
David L. Sanders
Neil J. Smart
Jared J. Torkington
Alastair C. J. Windsor
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05317-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

World Journal of Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue