Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Acute Pancreatitis | Original Scientific Report

A Modified AUGIS Delphi Process to Establish Future Research Priorities in Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

Authors: Michael S. J. Wilson, P. Vaughan-Shaw, C. Boyle, G. L. Yong, S. Oglesby, R. Skipworth, P. Lamb, E. A. T. Griffiths, S. E. A. Attwood, AUGIS

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities amongst benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Methods

Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high-priority research questions.

Results

Four hundred and twenty-seven questions were submitted in phase I, and 51 with a benign UGI focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Twenty-eight questions were ranked in phase III. A final list of 11 high-priority questions had an emphasis on acute pancreatitis, Barrett’s oesophagus and benign biliary disease.

Conclusion

A modified Delphi process has produced a list of 11 high-priority research questions in benign UGI surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tiernan J, Cook A, Geh I, George B, Magill L, Northover J et al (2014) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 16(12):965–970CrossRef Tiernan J, Cook A, Geh I, George B, Magill L, Northover J et al (2014) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 16(12):965–970CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, Wiley JP, Bois AJ, Boorman RS et al (2016) Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:56CrossRef Eubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, Wiley JP, Bois AJ, Boorman RS et al (2016) Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:56CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Henderson J, Reid A, Jain A (2018) Use of a modified BAPRAS Delphi process for research priority setting in Plastic Surgery in the UK. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(12):1679–1681CrossRef Henderson J, Reid A, Jain A (2018) Use of a modified BAPRAS Delphi process for research priority setting in Plastic Surgery in the UK. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(12):1679–1681CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Knight SR, Pathak S, Christie A, Jones L, Rees J, Davies H et al (2019) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities in HPB surgery across the United Kingdom. HPB, OxfordCrossRef Knight SR, Pathak S, Christie A, Jones L, Rees J, Davies H et al (2019) Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities in HPB surgery across the United Kingdom. HPB, OxfordCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM et al (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383(9912):156–165CrossRef Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM et al (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383(9912):156–165CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, Oliver S (2011) Patients' and clinicians' research priorities. Health Expect 14(4):439–448CrossRef Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, Oliver S (2011) Patients' and clinicians' research priorities. Health Expect 14(4):439–448CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Burt CG, Cima RR, Koltun WA, Littlejohn CE, Ricciardi R, Temple LK et al (2009) Developing a research agenda for the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: results of a delphi approach. Dis Colon Rectum 52(5):898–905CrossRef Burt CG, Cima RR, Koltun WA, Littlejohn CE, Ricciardi R, Temple LK et al (2009) Developing a research agenda for the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: results of a delphi approach. Dis Colon Rectum 52(5):898–905CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goldacre MJ, Roberts SE (2004) Hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an English population, 1963–98: database study of incidence and mortality. BMJ 328(7454):1466–1469CrossRef Goldacre MJ, Roberts SE (2004) Hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an English population, 1963–98: database study of incidence and mortality. BMJ 328(7454):1466–1469CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garg SK, Campbell JP, Anugwom C, Wadhwa V, Singh R, Gupta N et al (2018) Incidence and predictors of readmissions in acute pancreatitis: a nationwide analysis. Pancreas 47(1):46–54CrossRef Garg SK, Campbell JP, Anugwom C, Wadhwa V, Singh R, Gupta N et al (2018) Incidence and predictors of readmissions in acute pancreatitis: a nationwide analysis. Pancreas 47(1):46–54CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garg SK, Sarvepalli S, Campbell JP, Obaitan I, Singh D, Bazerbachi F et al (2019) Incidence, admission rates, and predictors, and economic burden of adult emergency visits for acute pancreatitis: data from the national emergency department sample, 2006 to 2012. J Clin Gastroenterol 53(3):220–225CrossRef Garg SK, Sarvepalli S, Campbell JP, Obaitan I, Singh D, Bazerbachi F et al (2019) Incidence, admission rates, and predictors, and economic burden of adult emergency visits for acute pancreatitis: data from the national emergency department sample, 2006 to 2012. J Clin Gastroenterol 53(3):220–225CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Raty S, Pulkkinen J, Nordback I, Sand J, Victorzon M, Gronroos J et al (2015) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevent recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis? A prospective randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 262(5):736–741CrossRef Raty S, Pulkkinen J, Nordback I, Sand J, Victorzon M, Gronroos J et al (2015) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevent recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis? A prospective randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 262(5):736–741CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mentula P (2017) Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after idiopathic acute pancreatitis may be overestimated. Ann Surg 266(6):e77–e78CrossRef Mentula P (2017) Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after idiopathic acute pancreatitis may be overestimated. Ann Surg 266(6):e77–e78CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Said M, Rongen APM (2017) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevent recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis? Ann Surg 266(6):e94–e95CrossRef Said M, Rongen APM (2017) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevent recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis? Ann Surg 266(6):e94–e95CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jankowski JAZ, de Caestecker J, Love SB, Reilly G, Watson P, Sanders S et al (2018) Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet 392(10145):400–408CrossRef Jankowski JAZ, de Caestecker J, Love SB, Reilly G, Watson P, Sanders S et al (2018) Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet 392(10145):400–408CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Old O, Moayyedi P, Love S, Roberts C, Hapeshi J, Foy C et al (2015) Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen 22(3):158–164CrossRef Old O, Moayyedi P, Love S, Roberts C, Hapeshi J, Foy C et al (2015) Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen 22(3):158–164CrossRef
17.
go back to reference A randomised controlled trial to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of expectant management versus pre-operative imaging with magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreaticogram (MRCP) in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones: The Sunflower Study https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10378861. Accessed 1 Sept 2019 A randomised controlled trial to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of expectant management versus pre-operative imaging with magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreaticogram (MRCP) in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones: The Sunflower Study https://​www.​isrctn.​com/​ISRCTN10378861. Accessed 1 Sept 2019
19.
go back to reference Pauwels A, Boecxstaens V, Andrews CN, Attwood SE, Berrisford R, Bisschops R et al (2019) How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery). Gut 68:1928–1941CrossRef Pauwels A, Boecxstaens V, Andrews CN, Attwood SE, Berrisford R, Bisschops R et al (2019) How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery). Gut 68:1928–1941CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM, Tran DD (2015) Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg 150(2):129–136CrossRef Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM, Tran DD (2015) Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg 150(2):129–136CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2016) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc 30(3):1172–1182CrossRef Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2016) Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc 30(3):1172–1182CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sutton AJ, Vohra RS, Hollyman M, Marriott PJ, Buja A, Alderson D et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology. Br J Surg 104(1):98–107CrossRef Sutton AJ, Vohra RS, Hollyman M, Marriott PJ, Buja A, Alderson D et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology. Br J Surg 104(1):98–107CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Modified AUGIS Delphi Process to Establish Future Research Priorities in Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery
Authors
Michael S. J. Wilson
P. Vaughan-Shaw
C. Boyle
G. L. Yong
S. Oglesby
R. Skipworth
P. Lamb
E. A. T. Griffiths
S. E. A. Attwood
AUGIS
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05308-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

World Journal of Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue