Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Breast Disease | Original Scientific Report

Pathology Evaluation of Reduction Mammaplasty Specimens and Subsequent Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Disease: A Claims-Based Analysis

Authors: Erika D. Sears, Yu-Ting Lu, Ting-Ting Chung, Adeyiza O. Momoh, Kevin C. Chung

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to measure the use of pathology evaluation of breast specimens among patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty and assess rates of new diagnoses of breast disease and associated cost.

Methods

We analyzed the Truven MarketScan Databases from 2009 to 2015 to identify adult female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty for macromastia. We recorded patient age, rates of obtaining pathology evaluation, new diagnoses of benign or malignant breast disease after pathology evaluation, and total cost for the surgery encounter.

Results

Among 17,738 macromastia patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty, 91.3% (n = 16,193) received pathology evaluation. Pathology evaluation rates were clinically similar across age groups <70 years (90.8–92.1%) and slightly lower for patients ≥70 (85.0%). Among 6987 patients less than 40 years who received pathology evaluation, 0.06% (n = 4) were subsequently diagnosed with malignant breast disease within 3 months, compared to 0.23% in the entire cohort (n = 37/16,193). Pathology claims resulted in an added $307 (SD 251) on average for the breast reduction surgery encounters.

Conclusions

Breast tissue after reduction mammaplasty is routinely submitted for pathology evaluation, without consideration of age-based risk for breast cancer. Routine pathology evaluation of breast tissue in patients in lower risk age groups (less than 40 years) required an additional $536,000 on average to detect a single occult breast cancer compared to an added $85,600 to detect a new malignancy in patients 40 years and older. Clinicians and policy makers should consider whether routine pathology evaluation of breast tissue should be individualized based on risk factors for breast cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ambaye AB, Goodwin AJ, MacLennan SE et al (2017) Recommendations for pathologic evaluation of reduction mammoplasty specimens: a prospective study with systematic tissue sampling. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141:1523–1528CrossRefPubMed Ambaye AB, Goodwin AJ, MacLennan SE et al (2017) Recommendations for pathologic evaluation of reduction mammoplasty specimens: a prospective study with systematic tissue sampling. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141:1523–1528CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Merkkola-von Schantz PA, Jahkola TA, Krogerus LA et al (2017) Should we routinely analyze reduction mammaplasty specimens? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:196–202CrossRefPubMed Merkkola-von Schantz PA, Jahkola TA, Krogerus LA et al (2017) Should we routinely analyze reduction mammaplasty specimens? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:196–202CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Uson Junior PLS, Callegaro Filho D, Bugano DDG et al (2018) Incidental findings in reduction mammoplasty specimens in patients with no prior history of breast cancer. an analysis of 783 specimens. Pathol Oncol Res 24:95–99CrossRefPubMed Uson Junior PLS, Callegaro Filho D, Bugano DDG et al (2018) Incidental findings in reduction mammoplasty specimens in patients with no prior history of breast cancer. an analysis of 783 specimens. Pathol Oncol Res 24:95–99CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kalliainen LK, Committee AHP (2012) ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:785–789CrossRefPubMed Kalliainen LK, Committee AHP (2012) ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:785–789CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tang CL, Brown MH, Levine R et al (1999) Breast cancer found at the time of breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1682–1686CrossRefPubMed Tang CL, Brown MH, Levine R et al (1999) Breast cancer found at the time of breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1682–1686CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carlson GW (2016) The management of breast cancer detected by reduction mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 43:341–347CrossRefPubMed Carlson GW (2016) The management of breast cancer detected by reduction mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 43:341–347CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rees TD, Coburn R (1972) Breast reduction: is it an aid to cancer detection? Br J Plast Surg 25:144–146CrossRefPubMed Rees TD, Coburn R (1972) Breast reduction: is it an aid to cancer detection? Br J Plast Surg 25:144–146CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bondeson L, Linell F, Ringberg A (1985) Breast reductions: what to do with all the tissue specimens? Histopathology 9:281–285CrossRefPubMed Bondeson L, Linell F, Ringberg A (1985) Breast reductions: what to do with all the tissue specimens? Histopathology 9:281–285CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guitton TG, van Leerdam RH, Ring D (2010) Necessity of routine pathological examination after surgical excision of wrist ganglions. J Hand Surg Am 35:905–908CrossRefPubMed Guitton TG, van Leerdam RH, Ring D (2010) Necessity of routine pathological examination after surgical excision of wrist ganglions. J Hand Surg Am 35:905–908CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McKeon K, Boyer MI, Goldfarb CA (2006) Use of routine histologic evaluation of carpal ganglions. J Hand Surg Am 31:284–288CrossRefPubMed McKeon K, Boyer MI, Goldfarb CA (2006) Use of routine histologic evaluation of carpal ganglions. J Hand Surg Am 31:284–288CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Culp JA, Hartigan BJ, Stern PJ (2001) A brief note. Ask yourself, why? A cost effective look at routine pathologic examination of specimens using the trapezium. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(5):722–724CrossRef Culp JA, Hartigan BJ, Stern PJ (2001) A brief note. Ask yourself, why? A cost effective look at routine pathologic examination of specimens using the trapezium. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83(5):722–724CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kocher MS, Erens G, Thornhill TS et al (2000) Cost and effectiveness of routine pathological examination of operative specimens obtained during primary total hip and knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82(11):1531–1535CrossRef Kocher MS, Erens G, Thornhill TS et al (2000) Cost and effectiveness of routine pathological examination of operative specimens obtained during primary total hip and knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82(11):1531–1535CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lin MM, Goldsmith JD, Resch SC et al (2012) Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1452–1460CrossRefPubMed Lin MM, Goldsmith JD, Resch SC et al (2012) Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1452–1460CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pitanguy I, Torres E, Salgado F et al (2005) Breast pathology and reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:729–734CrossRefPubMed Pitanguy I, Torres E, Salgado F et al (2005) Breast pathology and reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:729–734CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kerrigan CL, Slezak SS (2013) Evidence-based medicine: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1670–1683CrossRefPubMed Kerrigan CL, Slezak SS (2013) Evidence-based medicine: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1670–1683CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB et al (1996) Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276:1339–1341CrossRefPubMed Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB et al (1996) Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276:1339–1341CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dotto J, Kluk M, Geramizadeh B et al (2008) Frequency of clinically occult intraepithelial and invasive neoplasia in reduction mammoplasty specimens: a study of 516 cases. Int J Surg Pathol 16:25–30CrossRefPubMed Dotto J, Kluk M, Geramizadeh B et al (2008) Frequency of clinically occult intraepithelial and invasive neoplasia in reduction mammoplasty specimens: a study of 516 cases. Int J Surg Pathol 16:25–30CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ishag MT, Bashinsky DY, Beliaeva IV et al (2003) Pathologic findings in reduction mammaplasty specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 120:377–380CrossRefPubMed Ishag MT, Bashinsky DY, Beliaeva IV et al (2003) Pathologic findings in reduction mammaplasty specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 120:377–380CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kakagia D, Fragia K, Grekou A et al (2005) Reduction mammaplasty specimens and occult breast carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:19–21CrossRefPubMed Kakagia D, Fragia K, Grekou A et al (2005) Reduction mammaplasty specimens and occult breast carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:19–21CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Colwell AS, Kukreja J, Breuing KH et al (2004) Occult breast carcinoma in reduction mammaplasty specimens: 14-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1984–1988CrossRefPubMed Colwell AS, Kukreja J, Breuing KH et al (2004) Occult breast carcinoma in reduction mammaplasty specimens: 14-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1984–1988CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Viana GA, Pitanguy I, Torres E (2005) Histopathological findings in surgical specimens obtained from reduction mammaplasties. Breast 14:242–248CrossRefPubMed Viana GA, Pitanguy I, Torres E (2005) Histopathological findings in surgical specimens obtained from reduction mammaplasties. Breast 14:242–248CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ozmen S, Yavuzer R, Latifoglu O et al (2000) Coincidental breast carcinoma detection in reduction mammaplasty specimens. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1219–1220CrossRefPubMed Ozmen S, Yavuzer R, Latifoglu O et al (2000) Coincidental breast carcinoma detection in reduction mammaplasty specimens. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1219–1220CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Clark CJ, Whang S, Paige KT (2009) Incidence of precancerous lesions in breast reduction tissue: a pathologic review of 562 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1033–1039CrossRefPubMed Clark CJ, Whang S, Paige KT (2009) Incidence of precancerous lesions in breast reduction tissue: a pathologic review of 562 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1033–1039CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kyriopoulos E, Kakagia D, Zapandioti P et al (2012) Pathologic findings in breast reduction specimens: detection of occult premalignant and cancerous lesions. Onkologie 35:583–586CrossRefPubMed Kyriopoulos E, Kakagia D, Zapandioti P et al (2012) Pathologic findings in breast reduction specimens: detection of occult premalignant and cancerous lesions. Onkologie 35:583–586CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Merkkola-von Schantz PA, Jahkola TA, Krogerus LA et al (2017) Reduction mammaplasty in patients with history of breast cancer: the incidence of occult cancer and high-risk lesions. Breast 35:157–161CrossRefPubMed Merkkola-von Schantz PA, Jahkola TA, Krogerus LA et al (2017) Reduction mammaplasty in patients with history of breast cancer: the incidence of occult cancer and high-risk lesions. Breast 35:157–161CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hassan FE, Pacifico MD (2012) Should we be analysing breast reduction specimens? A systematic analysis of over 1,000 consecutive cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1105–1113CrossRef Hassan FE, Pacifico MD (2012) Should we be analysing breast reduction specimens? A systematic analysis of over 1,000 consecutive cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1105–1113CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ambaye AB, MacLennan SE, Goodwin AJ et al (2009) Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in reduction mammaplasty: increased sampling leads to increased detection. Prospect study Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1386–1392CrossRef Ambaye AB, MacLennan SE, Goodwin AJ et al (2009) Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in reduction mammaplasty: increased sampling leads to increased detection. Prospect study Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1386–1392CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Slezak S, Bluebond-Langner R (2011) Occult carcinoma in 866 reduction mammaplasties: preserving the choice of lumpectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:525–530CrossRefPubMed Slezak S, Bluebond-Langner R (2011) Occult carcinoma in 866 reduction mammaplasties: preserving the choice of lumpectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:525–530CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rudolph R, Niedbala AR (2003) Surgical management of the patient with invasive carcinoma discovered at reduction mammoplasty. Am Surg 69:1003–1005PubMed Rudolph R, Niedbala AR (2003) Surgical management of the patient with invasive carcinoma discovered at reduction mammoplasty. Am Surg 69:1003–1005PubMed
34.
go back to reference Koltz PF, Girotto JA (2010) The price of pathology: is screening all breast reduction specimens cost effective? Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1575–1576CrossRefPubMed Koltz PF, Girotto JA (2010) The price of pathology: is screening all breast reduction specimens cost effective? Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1575–1576CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Keshtgar M, Hamidian Jahromi A, Davidson T et al (2009) Tissue screening after breast reduction. BMJ 338:b630CrossRefPubMed Keshtgar M, Hamidian Jahromi A, Davidson T et al (2009) Tissue screening after breast reduction. BMJ 338:b630CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Greco R, Noone B (2017) Evidence-based medicine: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:230e–239eCrossRefPubMed Greco R, Noone B (2017) Evidence-based medicine: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:230e–239eCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pathology Evaluation of Reduction Mammaplasty Specimens and Subsequent Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Disease: A Claims-Based Analysis
Authors
Erika D. Sears
Yu-Ting Lu
Ting-Ting Chung
Adeyiza O. Momoh
Kevin C. Chung
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04931-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

World Journal of Surgery 6/2019 Go to the issue

Surgical Symposium Contribution

Is Global Pediatric Surgery a Good Investment?