Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-01-2019 | Original Scientific Report

The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist: A Joint Statement by the ERAS® and ERAS® USA Societies

Authors: Kevin M. Elias, Alexander B. Stone, Katharine McGinigle, Jo’An I. Tankou, Michael J. Scott, William J. Fawcett, Nicolas Demartines, Dileep N. Lobo, Olle Ljungqvist, Richard D. Urman, the ERAS® Society and ERAS® USA

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are multimodal care pathways designed to minimize the physiological and psychological impact of surgery for patients. Increased compliance with ERAS guidelines is associated with improved patient outcomes across surgical types. As ERAS programs have proliferated, an unintentional effect has been significant variation in how ERAS-related studies are reported in the literature.

Methods

To improve the quality of ERAS reporting, ERAS® USA and the ERAS® Society launched an effort to create an instrument to assist authors in manuscript preparation. Criteria to include were selected by a combination of literature review and expert opinion. The final checklist was refined by group consensus.

Results

The Societies present the Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist. The tool contains 20 items including best practices for reporting clinical pathways, compliance auditing, and formatting guidelines.

Conclusions

The RECOvER Checklist is intended to provide a standardized framework for the reporting of ERAS-related studies. The checklist can also assist reviewers in evaluating the quality of ERAS-related manuscripts. Authors are encouraged to include the RECOvER Checklist when submitting ERAS-related studies to peer-reviewed journals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery for noncolorectal surgery?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 267:57–65CrossRefPubMed Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E et al (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery for noncolorectal surgery?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 267:57–65CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Elias KM (2017) Understanding enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines: an introductory approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:871–875CrossRefPubMed Elias KM (2017) Understanding enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines: an introductory approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:871–875CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Simpson JC, Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MP et al (2015) Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009–2012. Br J Anaesth 115:560–568CrossRefPubMed Simpson JC, Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MP et al (2015) Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009–2012. Br J Anaesth 115:560–568CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Group EC (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159CrossRef Group EC (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3497CrossRef Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery program in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3497CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Huang H, Ma H, Chen S (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a preliminary study. Thorac Cancer 9:83–87CrossRefPubMed Huang H, Ma H, Chen S (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a preliminary study. Thorac Cancer 9:83–87CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Semerjian A, Milbar N, Kates M et al (2018) Hospital charges and length of stay following radical cystectomy in the enhanced recovery after surgery era. Urology 111:86–91CrossRefPubMed Semerjian A, Milbar N, Kates M et al (2018) Hospital charges and length of stay following radical cystectomy in the enhanced recovery after surgery era. Urology 111:86–91CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations—part II. Gynecol Oncol 140:323–332CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations—part II. Gynecol Oncol 140:323–332CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM et al (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5:70–78PubMedPubMedCentral Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM et al (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5:70–78PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Day RW, Fielder S, Calhoun J et al (2015) Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement. Br J Surg 102:1594–1602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Day RW, Fielder S, Calhoun J et al (2015) Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement. Br J Surg 102:1594–1602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MPW, Bennett-Guerrero E et al (2017) American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on measurement to maintain and improve quality of enhanced recovery pathways for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond) 6:6CrossRef Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MPW, Bennett-Guerrero E et al (2017) American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on measurement to maintain and improve quality of enhanced recovery pathways for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond) 6:6CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2016) Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263:465–476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2016) Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263:465–476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Callesen T, Klarskov B, Bech K et al (1999) Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardised recommendations: duration and reasons for delayed return to work. Eur J Surg 165:236–241CrossRefPubMed Callesen T, Klarskov B, Bech K et al (1999) Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardised recommendations: duration and reasons for delayed return to work. Eur J Surg 165:236–241CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S et al (2017) Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open 7:e015828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S et al (2017) Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open 7:e015828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Fawcett WJ, Mythen MG, Scott MJ (2012) Enhanced recovery: More than just reducing length of stay? Br J Anaesth 109:671–674CrossRefPubMed Fawcett WJ, Mythen MG, Scott MJ (2012) Enhanced recovery: More than just reducing length of stay? Br J Anaesth 109:671–674CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Petersen PB, Jorgensen CC, Kehlet H et al (2017) Delirium after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty—a cohort study of 6331 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:767–772CrossRefPubMed Petersen PB, Jorgensen CC, Kehlet H et al (2017) Delirium after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty—a cohort study of 6331 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:767–772CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Keller DS, Tantchou I, Flores-Gonzalez JR et al (2017) Predicting delayed discharge in a multimodal enhanced recovery pathway. Am J Surg 214:604–609CrossRefPubMed Keller DS, Tantchou I, Flores-Gonzalez JR et al (2017) Predicting delayed discharge in a multimodal enhanced recovery pathway. Am J Surg 214:604–609CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dickson EL, Stockwell E, Geller MA et al (2017) Enhanced recovery program and length of stay after laparotomy on a gynecologic oncology service: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 129:355–362CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dickson EL, Stockwell E, Geller MA et al (2017) Enhanced recovery program and length of stay after laparotomy on a gynecologic oncology service: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 129:355–362CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Phan TD, D’Souza B, Rattray MJ et al (2014) A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Anaesth Intensive Care 42:752–760CrossRefPubMed Phan TD, D’Souza B, Rattray MJ et al (2014) A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Anaesth Intensive Care 42:752–760CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P et al (2010) Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 303:2058–2064CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P et al (2010) Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 303:2058–2064CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist: A Joint Statement by the ERAS® and ERAS® USA Societies
Authors
Kevin M. Elias
Alexander B. Stone
Katharine McGinigle
Jo’An I. Tankou
Michael J. Scott
William J. Fawcett
Nicolas Demartines
Dileep N. Lobo
Olle Ljungqvist
Richard D. Urman
the ERAS® Society and ERAS® USA
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4753-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

World Journal of Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue