Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Scientific Report

A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination in Colorectal Surgery

Authors: Harry T. Papaconstantinou, Rocco Ricciardi, David A. Margolin, Roberto Bergamaschi, Robert C. Moesinger, Warren E. Lichliter, Elisa H. Birnbaum

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a persistent and morbid problem in colorectal surgery. Key to its pathogenesis is the degree of intraoperative bacterial contamination at the surgical site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel wound retractor at reducing bacterial contamination.

Methods

A prospective multicenter pilot study utilizing a novel wound retractor combining continuous irrigation and barrier protection was conducted in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections. Culture swabs were collected from the incision edge prior to device placement and from the exposed and protected incision edge prior to device removal. The primary and secondary endpoints were the rate of enteric and overall bacterial contamination on the exposed incision edge as compared to the protected incision edge, respectively. The safety endpoint was the absence of serious device-related adverse events.

Results

A total of 86 patients were eligible for analysis. The novel wound retractor was associated with a 66% reduction in overall bacterial contamination at the protected incision edge compared to the exposed incision edge (11.9 vs. 34.5%, P < 0.001), and 71% reduction in enteric bacterial contamination (9.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001). The incisional SSI rate was 2.3% in the primary analysis and 1.2% in those that completed the protocol. There were no adverse events attributed to device use.

Conclusions

A novel wound retractor combining continuous irrigation and barrier protection was associated with a significant reduction in bacterial contamination. Improved methods to counteract wound contamination represent a promising strategy for SSI prevention (NCT 02413879).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM et al (2006) Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg 141:1014–1018 discussion 1018 CrossRefPubMed Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM et al (2006) Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg 141:1014–1018 discussion 1018 CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J et al (2006) Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 244:758–763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J et al (2006) Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 244:758–763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference de Oliveira AC, Ciosak SI, Ferraz EM et al (2006) Surgical site infection in patients submitted to digestive surgery: risk prediction and the NNIS risk index. Am J Infect Control 34:201–207CrossRefPubMed de Oliveira AC, Ciosak SI, Ferraz EM et al (2006) Surgical site infection in patients submitted to digestive surgery: risk prediction and the NNIS risk index. Am J Infect Control 34:201–207CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y et al (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y et al (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8:573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Serra-Aracil X, Garcia-Domingo MI, Pares D et al (2011) Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures. Arch Surg 146:606–612CrossRefPubMed Serra-Aracil X, Garcia-Domingo MI, Pares D et al (2011) Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures. Arch Surg 146:606–612CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Scott RD The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infection in US Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention (2009), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Scott RD The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infection in US Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention (2009), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
8.
go back to reference de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V et al (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397CrossRefPubMed de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V et al (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C et al (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72:243–250CrossRefPubMed Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C et al (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72:243–250CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G et al (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 10:539–544CrossRef Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G et al (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 10:539–544CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Keenan JE, Speicher PJ, Thacker JK et al (2014) The preventive surgical site infection bundle in colorectal surgery: an effective approach to surgical site infection reduction and health care cost savings. JAMA Surg 149:1045–1052CrossRefPubMed Keenan JE, Speicher PJ, Thacker JK et al (2014) The preventive surgical site infection bundle in colorectal surgery: an effective approach to surgical site infection reduction and health care cost savings. JAMA Surg 149:1045–1052CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tillman M, Wehbe-Janek H, Hodges B et al (2013) Surgical care improvement project and surgical site infections: can integration in the surgical safety checklist improve quality performance and clinical outcomes? J Surg Res 184:150–156CrossRefPubMed Tillman M, Wehbe-Janek H, Hodges B et al (2013) Surgical care improvement project and surgical site infections: can integration in the surgical safety checklist improve quality performance and clinical outcomes? J Surg Res 184:150–156CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Rathore MA, Sains P et al (2017) A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Updates Surg 69:21–28CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Rathore MA, Sains P et al (2017) A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Updates Surg 69:21–28CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cheadle WG (2006) Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 7(Suppl 1):S7–11CrossRef Cheadle WG (2006) Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 7(Suppl 1):S7–11CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ruiz-Tovar J, Santos J, Arroyo A et al (2012) Effect of peritoneal lavage with clindamycin-gentamicin solution on infections after elective colorectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 214:202–207CrossRefPubMed Ruiz-Tovar J, Santos J, Arroyo A et al (2012) Effect of peritoneal lavage with clindamycin-gentamicin solution on infections after elective colorectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 214:202–207CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mueller TC, Loos M, Haller B et al (2015) Intra-operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:167–181CrossRefPubMed Mueller TC, Loos M, Haller B et al (2015) Intra-operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:167–181CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR et al (2013) Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14CrossRefPubMed Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR et al (2013) Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mohan HM, McDermott S, Fenelon L et al (2012) Plastic wound retractors as bacteriological barriers in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Hosp Infect 81:109–113CrossRefPubMed Mohan HM, McDermott S, Fenelon L et al (2012) Plastic wound retractors as bacteriological barriers in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Hosp Infect 81:109–113CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fa-Si-Oen PR, Kroeze F, Verhoef LH et al (2005) Bacteriology of abdominal wounds in elective open colon surgery: a prospective study of 100 surgical wounds. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:155–157CrossRefPubMed Fa-Si-Oen PR, Kroeze F, Verhoef LH et al (2005) Bacteriology of abdominal wounds in elective open colon surgery: a prospective study of 100 surgical wounds. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:155–157CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Waldron R, Drumm J, Cunningham F et al (1983) The value of intraoperative wound cultures in predicting the bacteriology of wound infection after elective abdominal surgery. Ir J Med Sci 152:300–302CrossRefPubMed Waldron R, Drumm J, Cunningham F et al (1983) The value of intraoperative wound cultures in predicting the bacteriology of wound infection after elective abdominal surgery. Ir J Med Sci 152:300–302CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K et al (2010) A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:501–503CrossRef Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K et al (2010) A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:501–503CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bhakta A, Tafen M, Glotzer O et al (2016) Increased Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in IBD Patients. Dis Colon Rectum 59:316–322CrossRefPubMed Bhakta A, Tafen M, Glotzer O et al (2016) Increased Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in IBD Patients. Dis Colon Rectum 59:316–322CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination in Colorectal Surgery
Authors
Harry T. Papaconstantinou
Rocco Ricciardi
David A. Margolin
Roberto Bergamaschi
Robert C. Moesinger
Warren E. Lichliter
Elisa H. Birnbaum
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4568-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

World Journal of Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue