Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life

Authors: Deepa V. Cherla, Maya L. Moses, Cristina P. Viso, Julie L. Holihan, Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez, Lillian S. Kao, Tien C. Ko, Mike K. Liang

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The modified Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) is a 13-question abdominal wall quality of life (AW-QOL) survey validated in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). No studies have assessed AW-QOL among individuals without abdominal wall pathology. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the modified AAS and its implications for the threshold at which VHR should be offered also remain unknown. Our objectives were to (1) establish the AW-QOL of patients with a clinical abdominal wall hernia versus those with no hernia, (2) determine the MCID of the modified AAS, and (3) identify the baseline quality of life (QOL) score at which patients derive little clinical benefit from VHR.

Methods

Patient-centered outcomes data for all patients presenting to General Surgery and Hernia Clinics October–December 2016 at a single safety-net institution were collected via a prospective, cross-sectional observational study design. Primary outcome was QOL measured using the modified AAS. Secondary outcome was the MCID.

Results

Patients with no hernia had modified AAS scores of 81.6 (50.4–94.4), while patients with a clinically apparent hernia had lower modified AAS scores of 31.4 (12.6–58.7) (p < 0.001). The MCID threshold was 7.6 for a “slight” change and 14.9 for “definite” change. Above a modified AAS score of 81, the risk of worsening a patient’s QOL by surgery is higher than the chances of improvement.

Conclusions

VHR can improve 1-year postsurgical AW-QOL to levels similar to that of the general population. The MCID of the modified AAS is 7.6 points. Patients with high baseline scores should be counseled about the lack of potential benefit in QOL from elective VHR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Itatsu K, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G et al (2014) Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 101(11):1439–1447CrossRefPubMed Itatsu K, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G et al (2014) Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 101(11):1439–1447CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Le Huu NR, Mege D, Ouaissi M et al (2012) Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg 149(5 Suppl):e3–e14 Le Huu NR, Mege D, Ouaissi M et al (2012) Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg 149(5 Suppl):e3–e14
3.
go back to reference Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260CrossRefPubMed Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McCarthy M Jr, Jonasson O, Chang CH et al (2005) Assessment of patient functional status after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 201(2):171–178CrossRefPubMed McCarthy M Jr, Jonasson O, Chang CH et al (2005) Assessment of patient functional status after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 201(2):171–178CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Lincourt AE, Walters AL et al (2016) Carolinas Comfort Scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life: a reappraisal utilizing 3788 international patients. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002027 Heniford BT, Lincourt AE, Walters AL et al (2016) Carolinas Comfort Scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life: a reappraisal utilizing 3788 international patients. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000002027​
15.
go back to reference Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG (2010) Testing minimally clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? Spine J 10:321–327CrossRefPubMed Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG (2010) Testing minimally clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? Spine J 10:321–327CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD et al (2014) Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg 218(3):363–366CrossRefPubMed Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD et al (2014) Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg 218(3):363–366CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Korakakis V, Sideris V, Giakas G (2014) Sitting bodily configuration: a study investigating the intra-tester reliability of positioning subjects into a predetermined sitting posture. Man Ther 19(3):197–202CrossRefPubMed Korakakis V, Sideris V, Giakas G (2014) Sitting bodily configuration: a study investigating the intra-tester reliability of positioning subjects into a predetermined sitting posture. Man Ther 19(3):197–202CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM et al (1999) Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 37(5):469–478CrossRefPubMed Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM et al (1999) Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 37(5):469–478CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life
Authors
Deepa V. Cherla
Maya L. Moses
Cristina P. Viso
Julie L. Holihan
Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez
Lillian S. Kao
Tien C. Ko
Mike K. Liang
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4173-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

World Journal of Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue