Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Cost-Effectiveness of Two Decision Strategies for Shunt Use During Carotid Endarterectomy

Authors: Joe L. P. Kolkert, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Vanessa J. Leijdekkers, Joep ter Haar, Clark J. Zeebregts, Anco Vahl

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Arterial shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is essential in some patients because of insufficient cerebral perfusion during cross-clamping. However, the optimal diagnostic modality identifying these patients is still debated. None of the currently used modalities has been proved superior to another. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of two modalities, stump pressure measurement (SPM) versus electroencephalography (EEG) combined with transcranial Doppler (TCD) during CEA.

Methods

Two retrospective cohorts of consecutive patients undergoing CEA with different intraoperative neuromonitoring strategies (SPM vs. EEG/TCD) were analyzed. Clinical data were collected from patient hospital records. Primary clinical outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Total admission costs were calculated based on volumes of healthcare resources. Analyses of effects and costs were adjusted for clinical differences between patients by means of a propensity score, and cost-effectiveness was estimated.

Results

A total of 503 (239 SPM; 264 EEG/TCD) patients were included, of whom 19 sustained a stroke or died during admission (3.3 vs. 4.2%, respectively, adjusted risk difference 1.3% (95% CI −2.3–4.8%)). Median total costs were €4946 (IQR 4424–6173) in the SPM group versus €7447 (IQR 6890–8675) in the EEG/TCD group. Costs for neurophysiologic assessments were the main determinant for the difference.

Conclusions

Given the evidence provided by this small retrospective study, SPM would be the favored strategy for intraoperative neuromonitoring if cost-effectiveness was taken into account when deciding which strategy to adopt.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Rango P, Brown MM, Chaturvedi S et al (2015) Summary of evidence on early carotid intervention for recently symptomatic stenosis based on meta-analysis of current risks. Stroke 46:3423–3436CrossRefPubMed De Rango P, Brown MM, Chaturvedi S et al (2015) Summary of evidence on early carotid intervention for recently symptomatic stenosis based on meta-analysis of current risks. Stroke 46:3423–3436CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW et al (1999) The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 30:1751–1758CrossRefPubMed Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW et al (1999) The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 30:1751–1758CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kolkert JL, Meerwaldt R, Geelkerken RH et al (2015) Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues part two. Am J Surg 209:403–412CrossRefPubMed Kolkert JL, Meerwaldt R, Geelkerken RH et al (2015) Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues part two. Am J Surg 209:403–412CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Group GTC, Lewis SC, Warlow CP et al (2008) General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 372:2132–2142CrossRef Group GTC, Lewis SC, Warlow CP et al (2008) General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 372:2132–2142CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hafner CD, Evans WE (1988) Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia: results and advantages. J Vasc Surg 7:232–239CrossRefPubMed Hafner CD, Evans WE (1988) Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia: results and advantages. J Vasc Surg 7:232–239CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hans SS, Jareunpoon O (2007) Prospective evaluation of electroencephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients. J Vasc Surg 45:511–515CrossRefPubMed Hans SS, Jareunpoon O (2007) Prospective evaluation of electroencephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients. J Vasc Surg 45:511–515CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Aburahma AF, Stone PA, Hass SM et al (2010) Prospective randomized trial of routine versus selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy based on stump pressure. J Vasc Surg 51:1133–1138CrossRefPubMed Aburahma AF, Stone PA, Hass SM et al (2010) Prospective randomized trial of routine versus selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy based on stump pressure. J Vasc Surg 51:1133–1138CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chongruksut W, Vaniyapong T, Rerkasem K (2014) Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:000190 Chongruksut W, Vaniyapong T, Rerkasem K (2014) Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:000190
10.
go back to reference Schnaudigel S, Groschel K, Pilgram SM et al (2008) New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 39:1911–1919CrossRefPubMed Schnaudigel S, Groschel K, Pilgram SM et al (2008) New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 39:1911–1919CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Meerwaldt R, Hermus L, Reijnen MM et al (2010) Carotid endarterectomy: current consensus and controversies. Surg Technol Int 20:283–291PubMed Meerwaldt R, Hermus L, Reijnen MM et al (2010) Carotid endarterectomy: current consensus and controversies. Surg Technol Int 20:283–291PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rijsdijk M, Ferrier C, Laman M et al (2009) Detection of ischemic electroencephalography changes during carotid endarterectomy using synchronization likelihood analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 21:302–306CrossRefPubMed Rijsdijk M, Ferrier C, Laman M et al (2009) Detection of ischemic electroencephalography changes during carotid endarterectomy using synchronization likelihood analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 21:302–306CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tytgat SH, Laman DM, Rijken AM et al (2005) Emboli rate during and early after carotid endarterectomy after a single preoperative dose of 120 mg acetylsalicylic acid—a prospective double-blind placebo controlled randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:156–161CrossRefPubMed Tytgat SH, Laman DM, Rijken AM et al (2005) Emboli rate during and early after carotid endarterectomy after a single preoperative dose of 120 mg acetylsalicylic acid—a prospective double-blind placebo controlled randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:156–161CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tan SS, Bouwmans CA, Rutten FF et al (2012) Update of the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28:152–158CrossRefPubMed Tan SS, Bouwmans CA, Rutten FF et al (2012) Update of the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28:152–158CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55CrossRef Rosenbaum PR (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nixon RM, Wonderling D, Grieve RD (2010) Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared. Health Econ 19:316–333CrossRefPubMed Nixon RM, Wonderling D, Grieve RD (2010) Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared. Health Econ 19:316–333CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Illuminati G, Calio FG, Pizzardi G et al (2015) Internal carotid artery rupture caused by carotid shunt insertion Int J Surg Case Rep 14:89–91PubMed Illuminati G, Calio FG, Pizzardi G et al (2015) Internal carotid artery rupture caused by carotid shunt insertion Int J Surg Case Rep 14:89–91PubMed
19.
go back to reference Katsuno M, Tanikawa R, Hashimoto M et al (2015) Distal internal carotid artery dissection due to the carotid shunt during carotid endarterectomy. Br J Neurosurg 29:862–864CrossRefPubMed Katsuno M, Tanikawa R, Hashimoto M et al (2015) Distal internal carotid artery dissection due to the carotid shunt during carotid endarterectomy. Br J Neurosurg 29:862–864CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Troisi N, Dorigo W, Pulli R et al (2010) A case of traumatic internal carotid artery aneurysm secondary to carotid shunting. J Vasc Surg 51:225–227CrossRefPubMed Troisi N, Dorigo W, Pulli R et al (2010) A case of traumatic internal carotid artery aneurysm secondary to carotid shunting. J Vasc Surg 51:225–227CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ (2005) Correlation of carotid artery stump pressure and neurologic changes during 474 carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients. J Vasc Surg 42:684–689CrossRefPubMed Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ (2005) Correlation of carotid artery stump pressure and neurologic changes during 474 carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients. J Vasc Surg 42:684–689CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference de Borst GJ, Moll FL, van de Pavoordt HD et al (2001) Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: When and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:484–489CrossRefPubMed de Borst GJ, Moll FL, van de Pavoordt HD et al (2001) Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: When and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:484–489CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Naylor AR, Sayers RD, McCarthy MJ et al (2013) Closing the loop: a 21-year audit of strategies for preventing stroke and death following carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 46:161–170CrossRefPubMed Naylor AR, Sayers RD, McCarthy MJ et al (2013) Closing the loop: a 21-year audit of strategies for preventing stroke and death following carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 46:161–170CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pennekamp CW, Tromp SC, Ackerstaff RG et al (2012) Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy with transcranial Doppler. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:371–376CrossRefPubMed Pennekamp CW, Tromp SC, Ackerstaff RG et al (2012) Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy with transcranial Doppler. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:371–376CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Evans WE, Hayes JP, Waltke EA et al (1985) Optimal cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: neurologic response under local anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 2:775–777CrossRefPubMed Evans WE, Hayes JP, Waltke EA et al (1985) Optimal cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: neurologic response under local anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 2:775–777CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Illig KA, Sternbach Y, Zhang R et al (2002) EEG changes during awake carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 16:6–11CrossRefPubMed Illig KA, Sternbach Y, Zhang R et al (2002) EEG changes during awake carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 16:6–11CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Stoughton J, Nath RL, Abbott WM (1998) Comparison of simultaneous electroencephalographic and mental status monitoring during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 28:1014–1021 (Discussion 1021–1013)CrossRefPubMed Stoughton J, Nath RL, Abbott WM (1998) Comparison of simultaneous electroencephalographic and mental status monitoring during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 28:1014–1021 (Discussion 1021–1013)CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Belardi P, Lucertini G, Ermirio D (2003) Stump pressure and transcranial Doppler for predicting shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 25:164–167CrossRefPubMed Belardi P, Lucertini G, Ermirio D (2003) Stump pressure and transcranial Doppler for predicting shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 25:164–167CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cao P, Giordano G, Zannetti S et al (1997) Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt? J Vasc Surg 26:973–979 (Discussion 979–980)CrossRefPubMed Cao P, Giordano G, Zannetti S et al (1997) Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt? J Vasc Surg 26:973–979 (Discussion 979–980)CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference McCarthy RJ, McCabe AE, Walker R et al (2001) The value of transcranial Doppler in predicting cerebral ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:408–412CrossRefPubMed McCarthy RJ, McCabe AE, Walker R et al (2001) The value of transcranial Doppler in predicting cerebral ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:408–412CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Two Decision Strategies for Shunt Use During Carotid Endarterectomy
Authors
Joe L. P. Kolkert
Rolf H. H. Groenwold
Vanessa J. Leijdekkers
Joep ter Haar
Clark J. Zeebregts
Anco Vahl
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4085-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

World Journal of Surgery 11/2017 Go to the issue