Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non-cross-linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual-Institutional Experience

Authors: J. J. Atema, E. J. Furnée, Y. Maeda, J. Warusavitarne, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman, C. J. Vaizey, M. A. Boermeester

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Data on the use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall repair in complex cases remain sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate a non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix for repair of complex contaminated abdominal wall defects.

Methods

Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing abdominal wall repair with use of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (LifeCell Corporation, Oxford, UK) between January 2011 and February 2015 at two National Intestinal Failure Units.

Results

Eighty patients were identified. Indications for abdominal wall repair included enterocutaneous fistula takedown (n = 50), infected synthetic mesh removal (n = 9), restoration of continuity or creation of a stoma with concomitant ventral hernia repair (n = 12), and others (n = 9). The median defect area was 143.0 cm2 (interquartile range or IQR 70.0–256.0 cm2). All had a grade III or IV hernia. Component separation technique (CST) was performed in 54 patients (68%). Complete fascial closure was not possible despite CST and biologic mesh-assisted traction (bridged repair) in 20 patients (25%). In-hospital mortality was 1%. Thirty-six patients (45%) developed a wound infection. None required mesh removal. Of 76 patients with a median clinical follow-up of 7 months (IQR 4–15) available for analysis, 10 patients (13%) developed a hernia recurrence, of whom 3 had undergone bridged repairs. Seven patients developed a postoperative (recurrent) fistula (9%).

Conclusion

Repair of challenging and contaminated abdominal wall defects can be done effectively with non-cross-linked biologic mesh and component separation technique without the need for mesh removal despite wound infections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, Luchette FA (2011) A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 253:16–26CrossRefPubMed Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, Luchette FA (2011) A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 253:16–26CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:9S–17SCrossRefPubMed Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:9S–17SCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR (2012) Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon 10:159–171CrossRefPubMed Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR (2012) Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon 10:159–171CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bellows CF, Smith A, Malsbury J, Helton WS (2013) Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence. Am J Surg 205:85–101CrossRefPubMed Bellows CF, Smith A, Malsbury J, Helton WS (2013) Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence. Am J Surg 205:85–101CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Harth KC, Krpata DM, Chawla A, Blatnik JA, Halaweish I, Rosen MJ (2013) Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Hernia 17:13–20CrossRefPubMed Harth KC, Krpata DM, Chawla A, Blatnik JA, Halaweish I, Rosen MJ (2013) Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Hernia 17:13–20CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, Carbonell AM, Chang A, Franklin M et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18:7–17CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, Carbonell AM, Chang A, Franklin M et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18:7–17CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Atema JJ, de Vries FE, Boermeester MA. (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg [Epub ahead of print] Atema JJ, de Vries FE, Boermeester MA. (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg [Epub ahead of print]
9.
go back to reference Harth KC, Rosen MJ (2009) Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 16:324–329CrossRefPubMed Harth KC, Rosen MJ (2009) Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 16:324–329CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mulder IM, Deerenberg EB, Bemelman WA, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2015) Infection susceptibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biological meshes in an experimental contaminated environment. Am J Surg 210:159–166CrossRefPubMed Mulder IM, Deerenberg EB, Bemelman WA, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2015) Infection susceptibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biological meshes in an experimental contaminated environment. Am J Surg 210:159–166CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cheng AW, Abbas MA, Tejirian T (2014) Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol versus Strattice. Am Surg 80:999–1002PubMed Cheng AW, Abbas MA, Tejirian T (2014) Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol versus Strattice. Am Surg 80:999–1002PubMed
12.
go back to reference Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT, Mathur AB, Jaffari MV, Rios CN (2010) Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 211:368–376CrossRefPubMed Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT, Mathur AB, Jaffari MV, Rios CN (2010) Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 211:368–376CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558CrossRefPubMed Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526CrossRefPubMed Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 18:800–804CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 18:800–804CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 257:991–996CrossRefPubMed Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 257:991–996CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Diaz JJ Jr, Conquest AM, Ferzoco SJ, Vargo D, Miller P, Wu YC et al (2009) Multi-institutional experience using human acellular dermal matrix for ventral hernia repair in a compromised surgical field. Arch Surg 144:209–215CrossRefPubMed Diaz JJ Jr, Conquest AM, Ferzoco SJ, Vargo D, Miller P, Wu YC et al (2009) Multi-institutional experience using human acellular dermal matrix for ventral hernia repair in a compromised surgical field. Arch Surg 144:209–215CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G III, Butler CE (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery 152:498–505CrossRefPubMed Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G III, Butler CE (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery 152:498–505CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Bokkerink WJ, Konijn V, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H (2015) Safety and durability of one-stage repair of abdominal wall defects with enteric fistulas. Ann Surg 261:553–557CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, Bokkerink WJ, Konijn V, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H (2015) Safety and durability of one-stage repair of abdominal wall defects with enteric fistulas. Ann Surg 261:553–557CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Connolly PT, Teubner A, Lees NP, Anderson ID, Scott NA, Carlson GL (2008) Outcome of reconstructive surgery for intestinal fistula in the open abdomen. Ann Surg 247:440–444CrossRefPubMed Connolly PT, Teubner A, Lees NP, Anderson ID, Scott NA, Carlson GL (2008) Outcome of reconstructive surgery for intestinal fistula in the open abdomen. Ann Surg 247:440–444CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217:991–998CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217:991–998CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Selber JC, Nguyen AT, Clemens MW et al (2013) Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 217:999–1009CrossRefPubMed Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Selber JC, Nguyen AT, Clemens MW et al (2013) Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 217:999–1009CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Garvey PB, Martinez RA, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE (2014) Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination. J Am Coll Surg 219:853–864CrossRefPubMed Garvey PB, Martinez RA, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE (2014) Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination. J Am Coll Surg 219:853–864CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Liang MK, Berger RL, Nguyen MT, Hicks SC, Li LT, Leong M (2014) Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 15:506–512CrossRef Liang MK, Berger RL, Nguyen MT, Hicks SC, Li LT, Leong M (2014) Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 15:506–512CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lin HJ, Spoerke N, Deveney C, Martindale R (2009) Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall hernias using acellular human dermal matrix: a single institution experience. Am J Surg 197:599–603CrossRefPubMed Lin HJ, Spoerke N, Deveney C, Martindale R (2009) Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall hernias using acellular human dermal matrix: a single institution experience. Am J Surg 197:599–603CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Krpata DM, Stein SL, Eston M, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YW et al (2013) Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown. Am J Surg 205:354–358CrossRefPubMed Krpata DM, Stein SL, Eston M, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YW et al (2013) Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown. Am J Surg 205:354–358CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Basta MN, Fischer JP, Kovach SJ (2015) Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique. Am J Surg 209:695–702CrossRefPubMed Basta MN, Fischer JP, Kovach SJ (2015) Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique. Am J Surg 209:695–702CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Blatnik J, Jin J, Rosen M (2008) Abdominal hernia repair with bridging acellular dermal matrix–an expensive hernia sac. Am J Surg 196:47–50CrossRefPubMed Blatnik J, Jin J, Rosen M (2008) Abdominal hernia repair with bridging acellular dermal matrix–an expensive hernia sac. Am J Surg 196:47–50CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Albino F, Bhanot P (2013) The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis. Am J Surg 205:209–212CrossRefPubMed Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Albino F, Bhanot P (2013) The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis. Am J Surg 205:209–212CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non-cross-linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual-Institutional Experience
Authors
J. J. Atema
E. J. Furnée
Y. Maeda
J. Warusavitarne
P. J. Tanis
W. A. Bemelman
C. J. Vaizey
M. A. Boermeester
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3962-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

World Journal of Surgery 8/2017 Go to the issue