Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Acute Appendicitis: A Weak Concordance Between Perioperative Diagnosis, Pathology and Peritoneal Fluid Cultivation

Authors: Sofie Tind, Niels Qvist

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The classification of acute appendicitis (AA) into various grades is not consistent, partly because it is not clear whether the perioperative or the histological findings should be the foundation of the classification. When comparing results from the literature on the frequency and treatment of AA it is important that the classifications are consistent. Furthermore, in the clinical settings, incorrect classification might lead to over diagnosing and a prolonged antibiotic treatment. The aim of our study was to investigate the concordance between perioperative diagnosis made by the surgeon and the histological findings of the removed appendix and furthermore compare this to the results from cultivation of peritoneal fluid aspirated perioperatively.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study including patients (≥15 years of age) undergoing appendectomy.

Results

A total of 131 patients were included. In 116 (89 %) of these cases, appendicitis was confirmed histological. There was low concordance between the perioperative and histological diagnoses, varying from 16 to 76 % depending on grade of AA. Only 44 % of the patients receiving antibiotics postoperatively had a positive peritoneal fluid cultivation.

Conclusion

There was a low concordance in clinical and histopathological diagnoses of the different grades of appendicitis. Perioperative cultivation of the peritoneal fluid as a standard should be further examined. The potential could be a reduced postoperative antibiotic use.

Clinicaltrials.gov

Registration no.: NCT02304653.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garst GC, Moore EE, Banerjee MN et al (2013) Acute appendicitis: a disease severity score for the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:32–36CrossRefPubMed Garst GC, Moore EE, Banerjee MN et al (2013) Acute appendicitis: a disease severity score for the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:32–36CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R et al (2000) Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633CrossRefPubMed Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R et al (2000) Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19:392–394CrossRef Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 19:392–394CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390CrossRefPubMed Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P et al (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–254CrossRefPubMed van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P et al (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–254CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bliss D, McKee J, Cho D et al (2010) Discordance of the pediatric surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of pediatric appendicitis with the pathologists report. J Pediatr Surg 45:1398–1403CrossRefPubMed Bliss D, McKee J, Cho D et al (2010) Discordance of the pediatric surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of pediatric appendicitis with the pathologists report. J Pediatr Surg 45:1398–1403CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Correa J, Jimeno J, Vallverdu H et al (2015) Correlation between intraoperative surgical diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis and the pathology report: clinical implications. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 16:41–44CrossRef Correa J, Jimeno J, Vallverdu H et al (2015) Correlation between intraoperative surgical diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis and the pathology report: clinical implications. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 16:41–44CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fallon SC, Kim ME, Hallmark CA et al (2015) Correlating surgical and pathological diagnoses in pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 50:638–641CrossRefPubMed Fallon SC, Kim ME, Hallmark CA et al (2015) Correlating surgical and pathological diagnoses in pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 50:638–641CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Acute Appendicitis: A Weak Concordance Between Perioperative Diagnosis, Pathology and Peritoneal Fluid Cultivation
Authors
Sofie Tind
Niels Qvist
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3686-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

World Journal of Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue