Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Scientific Report

Is Early Reversal of Defunctioning Ileostomy a Shorter, Easier and Less Expensive Operation?

Authors: Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Assad Aghahoseini, David Alexander

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A defunctioning loop ileostomy mitigates the consequences of anastomotic leak from low rectal anastomosis but it is associated with significant morbidity. In this study, the outcome of early reversal of defunctioning ileostomy during the same admission with the primary operation was assessed.

Methods

This randomized study was carried out at York Teaching Hospital during the period 2003–2007. All patients with defunctioning ileostomy were considered for an early second operation if they had an uneventful recovery and were in good general condition. Patients on steroids, at high cardiorespiratory risk and those experiencing any postoperative complication were excluded. Eligible patients with satisfactory gastrografin enema on postoperative day 6 were randomized to early versus late reversal at 6–8 weeks. Outcome measures were ease of closure as assessed by a visual analog scale by the operating surgeon, all postoperative complications, duration of the operation, total length of hospital stay and associated costs.

Results

Thirty-nine consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility and finally 26 were included in the study. Sixteen patients underwent early reversal. The median(interquartile range (IQR)) age was 62(22) years. Early reversal was significantly superior in terms of ease of abdominal wall closure, ease of reversal (p < 0.01 each), duration of the operation (median(IQR) 20(13) vs. 40(9) min, p < 0.01) and costs of stoma care (median(IQR) 27(9) vs. 311(108) £, p < 0.01). There were no major (grade III/IV) complications in either group. Total length of hospital stay was similar between groups.

Conclusion

In carefully selected patients, early reversal of defunctioning ileostomy is feasible, technically easier and has shorter operative time which can also lead to significant cost savings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Omundsen M, Hayes J, Collinson R et al (2012) Early ileostomy closure: is there a downside? ANZ J Surg 82:352–354CrossRefPubMed Omundsen M, Hayes J, Collinson R et al (2012) Early ileostomy closure: is there a downside? ANZ J Surg 82:352–354CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Alves A, Panis Y, Lelong B et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed temporary stoma closure after proctectomy. Br J Surg 95:693–698CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Lelong B et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed temporary stoma closure after proctectomy. Br J Surg 95:693–698CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bakx R, Busch OR, van Geldere D et al (2003) Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1680–1684CrossRefPubMed Bakx R, Busch OR, van Geldere D et al (2003) Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1680–1684CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Menegaux F, Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N et al (2002) Closure of small bowel stomas on postoperative day 10. Eur J Surg 168:713–715CrossRefPubMed Menegaux F, Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N et al (2002) Closure of small bowel stomas on postoperative day 10. Eur J Surg 168:713–715CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7:279–285CrossRefPubMed Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7:279–285CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA et al (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21:277–281CrossRefPubMed Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA et al (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21:277–281CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Neuman HB, Patil S, Fuzesi S et al (2011) Impact of a temporary stoma on the quality of life of rectal cancer patients undergoing treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1397–1403CrossRefPubMed Neuman HB, Patil S, Fuzesi S et al (2011) Impact of a temporary stoma on the quality of life of rectal cancer patients undergoing treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1397–1403CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA et al (2014) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16:95–109CrossRefPubMed Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA et al (2014) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16:95–109CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N, Tresallet C et al (2003) Early closure of temporary stoma of the small bowel. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27:697–699PubMed Jordi-Galais P, Turrin N, Tresallet C et al (2003) Early closure of temporary stoma of the small bowel. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27:697–699PubMed
11.
go back to reference Danielsen AK, Correa-Marinez A, Angenete E et al (2011) Early closure of temporary ileostomy—the EASY trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 1:e000162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Danielsen AK, Correa-Marinez A, Angenete E et al (2011) Early closure of temporary ileostomy—the EASY trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 1:e000162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Robertson J, Linkhorn H, Vather R et al (2015) Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomy closure: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 32:166–172CrossRefPubMed Robertson J, Linkhorn H, Vather R et al (2015) Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomy closure: a case-matched study. Dig Surg 32:166–172CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is Early Reversal of Defunctioning Ileostomy a Shorter, Easier and Less Expensive Operation?
Authors
Konstantinos Lasithiotakis
Assad Aghahoseini
David Alexander
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3448-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

World Journal of Surgery 7/2016 Go to the issue