Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Changes in the Surgical Management of Parastomal Hernias Over 15 Years: Results of 135 Cases

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Over the years, various open and laparoscopic approaches toward the repair of parastomal hernias (PSH) have been described. The variety of published techniques itself can be seen as an indicator for the often low level of satisfaction reached with the surgical procedures.

Methods

From January 1999 to January 2014, we assessed all cases of PSH repair performed at the three participating surgical departments in a retrospective analysis. The results were evaluated with regard to different surgical techniques focusing on complications and recurrences.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five individuals could be included in the analysis. They were operated on with eight different surgical techniques. Laparoscopic procedures were carried out in 46.7 % (63/135) of the cases. Median follow-up was 54 months (12–146 months). We found 44 cases of recurrence (32.6 %) and 24 (17.8 %) of the patients experienced perioperative complications and 12 of them needed to return to theater. Fourteen of the 135 patients (10.4 %) were operated as emergency cases which were associated with a mortality of 28.6 % (4/14). In case of elective PSH repair, no mortality occured.

Conclusion

The results achieved by direct suture or the use of incised flat meshes for the repair of PSH were poor with these procedures having unacceptably high recurrence rates. With regard to the latter ostomy revision through three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes and the laparoscopic sandwich technique showed the best results. Emergency procedures were linked to a dramatic increase in morbidity and mortality (p < 0.001).
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M (2010) Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 53(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M (2010) Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 53(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563CrossRefPubMed Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):916–920CrossRefPubMed Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):916–920CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11(2):173–177CrossRefPubMed Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11(2):173–177CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al (2013) Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(11):1265–1272CrossRefPubMed Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al (2013) Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(11):1265–1272CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gregg ZA, Dao HE, Schechter S, Shah N (2014) Paracolostomy hernia repair: who and when? J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1105–1112CrossRefPubMed Gregg ZA, Dao HE, Schechter S, Shah N (2014) Paracolostomy hernia repair: who and when? J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1105–1112CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Berger D (2008) Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST). Hernia 12(3):243–246CrossRefPubMed Berger D (2008) Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST). Hernia 12(3):243–246CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Köhler G, Koch OO, Antoniou SA et al (2014) Parastomal hernia repair with a 3-D mesh device and additional flat mesh repair of the abdominal wall. Hernia 18(5):653–661CrossRefPubMed Köhler G, Koch OO, Antoniou SA et al (2014) Parastomal hernia repair with a 3-D mesh device and additional flat mesh repair of the abdominal wall. Hernia 18(5):653–661CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Paß C et al (2012) Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia 16(3):269–276CrossRefPubMed Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Paß C et al (2012) Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia 16(3):269–276CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1668–1673CrossRefPubMed Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1668–1673CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 244:931–937 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 244:931–937
15.
go back to reference Hansson BM (2013) Parastomal hernia: treatment and prevention 2013; where do we go from here? Colorectal Dis 15(12):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed Hansson BM (2013) Parastomal hernia: treatment and prevention 2013; where do we go from here? Colorectal Dis 15(12):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, Groenewoud HM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255(4):685–695CrossRefPubMed Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, Groenewoud HM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255(4):685–695CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T et al (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(2):494–500PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T et al (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(2):494–500PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mizrahi H, Bhattacharya P, Parker MC (2012) Laparoscopic slit mesh repair of parastomal hernia using a designated mesh: long-term results. Surg Endosc 26(1):267–270CrossRefPubMed Mizrahi H, Bhattacharya P, Parker MC (2012) Laparoscopic slit mesh repair of parastomal hernia using a designated mesh: long-term results. Surg Endosc 26(1):267–270CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hansson BM, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh ICH (2009) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 23(7):1456–1459CrossRefPubMed Hansson BM, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh ICH (2009) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 23(7):1456–1459CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Al Shakarchi J, Williams JG (2014) Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair. Tech Coloproctol 18(5):427–432CrossRefPubMed Al Shakarchi J, Williams JG (2014) Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair. Tech Coloproctol 18(5):427–432CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR et al (2011) Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 15(7):1252–1258PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR et al (2011) Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 15(7):1252–1258PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Changes in the Surgical Management of Parastomal Hernias Over 15 Years: Results of 135 Cases
Publication date
01-11-2015
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3187-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

World Journal of Surgery 11/2015 Go to the issue