Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Reply, Letter to the Editor

Relative Risk of Prolonged Operative Times From Inconsistent Surgical Teams: Reply

Authors: Monica Bennett, Yan Xiao

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank Dr. Dexter for his comments on our article [1] about interpreting odds ratios, and we agree with him about the value of relative risk information. As pointed by Dr. Dexter, odds ratios can be an overestimator of relative risk, even though levels of statistical significance remain the same [2]. Dr. Dexter is correct in that our paper provided odds ratios, not relative risk, and therefore our paper’s discussion section contained overestimates of relative risk. Using the conversion formula provided by Zhang and Yu [2] and as suggested in Dr. Dexter’s letter, we calculated the adjusted relative risk. When compared cases with consistent surgical teams, the relative risk of cases by inconsistent teams for prolonged operative time, prolonged hospital stay, and 30-day hospital readmission was 1.37 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.61), 1.30 (95 % CI 1.15–1.46), and 1.36 (95 % CI 1.06–1.74), respectively. …
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Zhang J, Yu KF (1998) What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 280:1690–1691PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Yu KF (1998) What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 280:1690–1691PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relative Risk of Prolonged Operative Times From Inconsistent Surgical Teams: Reply
Authors
Monica Bennett
Yan Xiao
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3054-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

World Journal of Surgery 8/2015 Go to the issue