Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation

Authors: Rachel Rosenthal, Henry Hoffmann, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Heiner C. Bucher, Salome Dell-Kuster

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Standardized reporting of intraoperative adverse events is important to enhance transparency. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated definition and classification of intraoperative complications.

Methods

We conducted a two-round Delphi study to develop a definition and classification of intraoperative complications. Experts were contacted by email and sent a link to the online questionnaire. In a pilot study, two independent raters applied the definition and classification in a sample of 60 surgical interventions of low, intermediate, and high complexity and evaluated practicability. Interrater agreement of the classification was determined (raw categorical agreement, weighted kappa, and intraclass correlation).

Results

In the Delphi study, 40 of 52 experts (77 % return rate) from 14 countries took part in each round. The Delphi study resulted in a comprehensive definition of intraoperative complications as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course occurring between skin incision and skin closure. The classification foresees four grades depending on the need for treatment (no need, grade I; need for treatment, grade II) and the severity of the complication (life-threatening/permanent disability, grade III; death, grade IV). The pilot study showed good practicability (6 on a 7-point scale) and a high raw agreement of 87 %, a weighted kappa of 0.83 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.94] and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.73–0.90).

Conclusions

While the Delphi process enabled to develop definitions and classification of intraoperative complications by severity, further research including a multicentre international full-scale validation needs to be conducted with the ultimate goal to contribute to standardized reporting in surgical practice and research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kram R (2008) Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:240–244PubMedCrossRef Kram R (2008) Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:240–244PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R (2013) Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors 55:138–156PubMedCrossRef Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R (2013) Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors 55:138–156PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nagpal K, Abboudi M, Fischler L, Schmidt T, Vats A, Manchanda C, Sevdalis N, Scheidegger D, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2011) Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork. Ann Surg 253:831–837PubMedCrossRef Nagpal K, Abboudi M, Fischler L, Schmidt T, Vats A, Manchanda C, Sevdalis N, Scheidegger D, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2011) Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork. Ann Surg 253:831–837PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed
7.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de SE, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de SE, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pillai SB, van Rij AM, Williams S, Thomson IA, Putterill MJ, Greig S (1999) Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome. Br J Surg 86:1567–1572PubMedCrossRef Pillai SB, van Rij AM, Williams S, Thomson IA, Putterill MJ, Greig S (1999) Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome. Br J Surg 86:1567–1572PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pomposelli JJ, Gupta SK, Zacharoulis DC, Landa R, Miller A, Nanda R (1997) Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 25:1007–1014PubMedCrossRef Pomposelli JJ, Gupta SK, Zacharoulis DC, Landa R, Miller A, Nanda R (1997) Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 25:1007–1014PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Dwan K, Clavien PA, Bucher HC (2015) Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice. World J Surg 39:80–87PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Dwan K, Clavien PA, Bucher HC (2015) Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice. World J Surg 39:80–87PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2013) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8 Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2013) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(10):1–8
14.
go back to reference Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef Preston CC, Colman AM (2000) Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 104:1–15CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97PubMedCrossRef Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvath A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R, Largiader F (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791PubMedCrossRef Klotz HP, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvath A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R, Largiader F (1996) Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg 83:1788–1791PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Streiner DL (1995) Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 40:60–66PubMed Streiner DL (1995) Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 40:60–66PubMed
18.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measur 33:613–619CrossRef Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measur 33:613–619CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Warrens MJ (2011) Weighted kappa is higher than Cohen’s kappa for tridiagonal agreement tables. Stat Methodol 8:268–272CrossRef Warrens MJ (2011) Weighted kappa is higher than Cohen’s kappa for tridiagonal agreement tables. Stat Methodol 8:268–272CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2678–2691PubMedCrossRef Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2678–2691PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fabri PJ, Zayas-Castro JL (2008) Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Surgery 144:557–563PubMedCrossRef Fabri PJ, Zayas-Castro JL (2008) Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Surgery 144:557–563PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
25.
go back to reference Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMedCrossRef Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Edlin R, Hall P, Wallner K, McCabe C (2014) Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies? Value Health 17:438–444PubMedCrossRef Edlin R, Hall P, Wallner K, McCabe C (2014) Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies? Value Health 17:438–444PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Long G, Mortimer R, Sanzenbacher G (2014) Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology. J Med Econ 17:1–11CrossRef Long G, Mortimer R, Sanzenbacher G (2014) Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology. J Med Econ 17:1–11CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation
Authors
Rachel Rosenthal
Henry Hoffmann
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Heiner C. Bucher
Salome Dell-Kuster
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

World Journal of Surgery 7/2015 Go to the issue