Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

Method of Bilateral Pleural Drainage by Single Blake Drain After Esophagectomy

Authors: Yukiko Niwa, Masahiko Koike, Hisaharu Oya, Naoki Iwata, Daisuke Kobayashi, Mitsuro Kanda, Chie Tanaka, Suguru Yamada, Tsutomu Fujii, Goro Nakayama, Hiroyuki Sugimoto, Shuji Nomoto, Michitaka Fujiwara, Yasuhiro Kodera

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinicians often encounter left pleural effusion after esophagectomy, which sometimes necessitates thoracentesis. We have introduced a new drainage method, bilateral pleural drainage by single Blake drain (BDSD), which we have been using since April 2013. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the BDSD.

Methods

The BDSD method employs a 15-F Blake drain inserted from the right thoracic cavity to the left thoracic cavity across the posterior mediastinum. The conventional drain (CD) group consisted of 50 patients with a 19-F Blake drain placed in the right thoracic cavity during the period from April 2012 to March 2013. The BDSD group consisted of 54 patients treated from April 2013 to June 2014.

Results

The amount of total drainage in the BDSD group was significantly higher than that in the CD group (P < 0.0001). The rates of left pleural effusion and left lower lobe atelectasis in the BDSD group were significantly lower than those in the CD group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). No patients developed a left pleural effusion necessitating thoracentesis drainage in the BDSD group.

Conclusions

Compared with the conventional method, BDSD was able to evacuate bilateral pleural effusion more effectively, and the incidences of left pleural effusion and left atelectasis were lower. This method is therefore clinically useful after esophagectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takuya S, Shunzo H, Tetsuya A et al (2011) The method of placing and management of the Blake drain with bilateral pleural drainage after esophageal surgery in Japanese. Shujutsu Oper 65:1–5 Takuya S, Shunzo H, Tetsuya A et al (2011) The method of placing and management of the Blake drain with bilateral pleural drainage after esophageal surgery in Japanese. Shujutsu Oper 65:1–5
2.
go back to reference Fukui T, Sakakura N, Kobayashi R et al (2009) Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:645–648CrossRefPubMed Fukui T, Sakakura N, Kobayashi R et al (2009) Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:645–648CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sakakura N, Fukui T, Mori S et al (2009) Fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics of Blake and conventional drains used after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1539–1545CrossRefPubMed Sakakura N, Fukui T, Mori S et al (2009) Fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics of Blake and conventional drains used after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1539–1545CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sakopoulos AG, Hurwitz AS, Suda RW et al (2005) Efficacy of Blake drains for mediastinal and pleural drainage following cardiac operations. J Card Surg 20:574–577CrossRefPubMed Sakopoulos AG, Hurwitz AS, Suda RW et al (2005) Efficacy of Blake drains for mediastinal and pleural drainage following cardiac operations. J Card Surg 20:574–577CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Icard P, Chautard J, Zhang X et al (2006) A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:649–651CrossRefPubMed Icard P, Chautard J, Zhang X et al (2006) A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:649–651CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Roberts N, Boehm M, Bates M et al (2006) Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed Roberts N, Boehm M, Bates M et al (2006) Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K et al (2009) The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 8:58–61CrossRefPubMed Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K et al (2009) The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 8:58–61CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kamiyoshihara M, Nagashima T, Ibe T (2010) A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 18:435–442CrossRefPubMed Kamiyoshihara M, Nagashima T, Ibe T (2010) A proposal for management after lung resection, using a flexible silastic drain. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 18:435–442CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Moss E, Miller CS, Jensen H et al (2013) A randomized trial of early versus delayed mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery using silastic and conventional tubes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:110–115CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Moss E, Miller CS, Jensen H et al (2013) A randomized trial of early versus delayed mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery using silastic and conventional tubes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:110–115CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Method of Bilateral Pleural Drainage by Single Blake Drain After Esophagectomy
Authors
Yukiko Niwa
Masahiko Koike
Hisaharu Oya
Naoki Iwata
Daisuke Kobayashi
Mitsuro Kanda
Chie Tanaka
Suguru Yamada
Tsutomu Fujii
Goro Nakayama
Hiroyuki Sugimoto
Shuji Nomoto
Michitaka Fujiwara
Yasuhiro Kodera
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2860-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

World Journal of Surgery 3/2015 Go to the issue