Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2014

Open Access 01-09-2014

A Modification of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Left Pancreas: Significance of En Bloc Resection Including the Anterior Renal Fascia

Authors: Hirohisa Kitagawa, Hidehiro Tajima, Hisatoshi Nakagawara, Isamu Makino, Tomoharu Miyashita, Hirofumi Terakawa, Shinichi Nakanuma, Hironori Hayashi, Hiroyuki Takamura, Tetsuo Ohta

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has theoretical advantages for curative resection of adenocarcinomas of the left pancreas. The anterior renal fascia is a key structure, and resection planes should run posterior to this fascia. However, it is difficult to delineate this fascia and set a precise dissection plane. We modified RAMPS to achieve such a precise dissection plane with ease.

Methods

After clamping the splenic artery, the third duodenal portion was mobilized from the left to the right to locate the inferior vena cava, which was covered by the anterior renal fascia. Here, the anterior renal fascia was incised while approaching the dissection plane. Dissection then continued cephalad, with this plane along the inferior vena cava, and then turned along the left renal vein at the confluence of the left renal vein toward the renal hilum. At this point, dissection continued along the coronal plane to the superior edge of the pancreas.

Results

Between July 2007 and December 2012, a total of 24 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients underwent modified RAMPS. Tumor extension beyond the pancreatic parenchyma (T3) and lymph node metastases was confirmed in 17 and 13 cases, respectively. Histologically clear surgical margins were achieved (R0 resection) in 21 patients (88 %). The 5-year overall survival rate was 53 %. Six patients survived for over 5 years without recurrence.

Conclusions

This modification of RAMPS is advantageous for en bloc resection while actually including removal of the anterior renal fascia. It is associated with satisfactory survival rates for patients with distal pancreatic carcinomas.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Staley CA, Cleary KR, Abbruzzese JL et al (1996) The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens. Pancreas 12:373–380PubMedCrossRef Staley CA, Cleary KR, Abbruzzese JL et al (1996) The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens. Pancreas 12:373–380PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133:521–527PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133:521–527PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kitagawa H, Ohta T, Tani T et al (2008) Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:377–383PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa H, Ohta T, Tani T et al (2008) Nonclosure technique with saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery in management of the cut surface after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:377–383PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg 246:46–51PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg 246:46–51PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (eds) (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (eds) (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
8.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K et al (1998) Distal pancreatectomy—does it have a role for pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 45:827–832PubMed Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K et al (1998) Distal pancreatectomy—does it have a role for pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 45:827–832PubMed
11.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257; discussion 257–260 Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257; discussion 257–260
12.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579PubMedCrossRef Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg 139:718–725; discussion 725–717 Schmidt CM, Powell ES, Yiannoutsos CT et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients. Arch Surg 139:718–725; discussion 725–717
14.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R et al (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R et al (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 228:508–517PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236:355–366 discussion 366–358PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236:355–366 discussion 366–358PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618–628; discussion 628–630 Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618–628; discussion 628–630
17.
go back to reference Nimura Y NM, Kato H, et al (2004) Regional versus extended lymph node dissection in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial (abstract). Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Assoc 6 (Suppl I):2 Nimura Y NM, Kato H, et al (2004) Regional versus extended lymph node dissection in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial (abstract). Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Assoc 6 (Suppl I):2
18.
go back to reference Lei QF, Marks SC, Touliopoulos P et al (1990) Fascial planes and compartments of the posterior abdomen: the perirenal and pararenal pathways. Clin Anat 3:1–15CrossRef Lei QF, Marks SC, Touliopoulos P et al (1990) Fascial planes and compartments of the posterior abdomen: the perirenal and pararenal pathways. Clin Anat 3:1–15CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kitagawa H, Tajima H, Nakagawara H et al (2013) The retropancreatic fusion fascia acts as a barrier against infiltration by pancreatic carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol 1:418–422PubMedCentralPubMed Kitagawa H, Tajima H, Nakagawara H et al (2013) The retropancreatic fusion fascia acts as a barrier against infiltration by pancreatic carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol 1:418–422PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Deki H, Sato T (1988) An anatomic study of the peripancreatic lymphatics. Surg Radiol Anat 10:121–135PubMedCrossRef Deki H, Sato T (1988) An anatomic study of the peripancreatic lymphatics. Surg Radiol Anat 10:121–135PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
22.
go back to reference Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F et al (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg 214:46–52PubMedCrossRef Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F et al (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg 214:46–52PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rosso E, Langella S, Addeo P et al (2013) A safe technique for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with venous resection for pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg 217:e35–e39PubMedCrossRef Rosso E, Langella S, Addeo P et al (2013) A safe technique for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with venous resection for pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg 217:e35–e39PubMedCrossRef
24.
Metadata
Title
A Modification of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Left Pancreas: Significance of En Bloc Resection Including the Anterior Renal Fascia
Authors
Hirohisa Kitagawa
Hidehiro Tajima
Hisatoshi Nakagawara
Isamu Makino
Tomoharu Miyashita
Hirofumi Terakawa
Shinichi Nakanuma
Hironori Hayashi
Hiroyuki Takamura
Tetsuo Ohta
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2572-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

World Journal of Surgery 9/2014 Go to the issue