Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2014

01-04-2014

Fatal Surgical or Procedure-Related Complications: A Finnish Registry-Based Study

Authors: Tapio Hakala, Jaana Vironen, Sari Karlsson, Jarkko Pajarinen, Eero Hirvensalo, Hannu Paajanen

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

In Finland, all healthcare personnel must be insured against causing patient injury. The Patient Insurance Centre (PIC) pays compensation in all cases of malpractice and in some cases of infection or other surgical complications. This study aimed to analyze all complaints relating to fatal surgical or other procedure-related errors in Finland during 2006–2010.

Materials and methods

In total, 126 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Details of patient care and decisions made by the PIC were reviewed, and the total national number of surgical procedures for the study period was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Registry.

Results

Of the 94 patients who underwent surgery, most fatal surgical complications involved orthopedic or gastrointestinal surgery. Non-surgical procedures with fatal complications included deliveries (N = 10), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or nasogastric tube insertion (N = 8), suprapubic catheter insertion (N = 4), lower intestinal endoscopy (N = 5), coronary angiogram (N = 1), pacemaker fitting (N = 1), percutaneous drainage of a hepatic abscess (N = 1), and chest tube insertion (N = 2). In 42 (33.3 %) cases, patient injury resulted from errors made during the procedure, including 24 technical errors and 15 errors of judgment. There were 19 (15.2 %) cases of inappropriate pre-operative assessment, 28 (22.4 %) errors made in postoperative follow-up, 23 (18.4 %) cases of fatal infection, and 11 (8.8 %) fatal complications not linked to treatment errors.

Conclusion

Fatal surgical and procedure-related complications are rare in Finland. Complications are usually the result of errors of judgment, technical errors, and infections.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Leppäniemi A (2012) Safe surgery—a cornerstone of quality. Scan J Surg 101:146CrossRef Leppäniemi A (2012) Safe surgery—a cornerstone of quality. Scan J Surg 101:146CrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mikkonen M (2004) Prevention of patient injuries: the Finnish patient insurance scheme. Med Law 23:251–257PubMed Mikkonen M (2004) Prevention of patient injuries: the Finnish patient insurance scheme. Med Law 23:251–257PubMed
6.
go back to reference Keskimaki I, Aro S (1991) Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital register. Int J Health Sci 2:15–21 Keskimaki I, Aro S (1991) Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital register. Int J Health Sci 2:15–21
7.
go back to reference Brainbridge D, Arango M, Cheng D (2012) Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 380:1075–1081CrossRef Brainbridge D, Arango M, Cheng D (2012) Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 380:1075–1081CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bosma E, Veen EJ, Roukema JA (2011) Incidence, nature and impact of error in surgery. Br J Surg 98:1654–1659PubMedCrossRef Bosma E, Veen EJ, Roukema JA (2011) Incidence, nature and impact of error in surgery. Br J Surg 98:1654–1659PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499PubMedCrossRef Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Steward RM, Corneille MG, Johnston J et al (2006) Transparent and open discussion of errors does not increase malpractice risk in trauma patients. Ann Surg 243:645–651CrossRef Steward RM, Corneille MG, Johnston J et al (2006) Transparent and open discussion of errors does not increase malpractice risk in trauma patients. Ann Surg 243:645–651CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Prabhakaran S, Doraiswamy VA, Nagaraja V et al (2012) Nasoenteric tube complications. Scan J Surg 101:147–155CrossRef Prabhakaran S, Doraiswamy VA, Nagaraja V et al (2012) Nasoenteric tube complications. Scan J Surg 101:147–155CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Merchea A, Cullinane DC, Sawyer MD et al (2010) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy-associated gastrointestinal perforations: a single-center experience. Surgery 148:876–880PubMedCrossRef Merchea A, Cullinane DC, Sawyer MD et al (2010) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy-associated gastrointestinal perforations: a single-center experience. Surgery 148:876–880PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB et al (2009) Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 150:849–857PubMedCrossRef Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB et al (2009) Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 150:849–857PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aylwin CJ, Brohi K, Davies GD, Walsh MS (2008) Pre-hospital and in-hospital thoracostomy: indications and complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:54–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Aylwin CJ, Brohi K, Davies GD, Walsh MS (2008) Pre-hospital and in-hospital thoracostomy: indications and complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:54–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C et al (2006) The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:210–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C et al (2006) The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:210–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Juntti-Patinen L, Neuvonen PJ (2002) Drug-related deaths in a university central hospital. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:479–482PubMedCrossRef Juntti-Patinen L, Neuvonen PJ (2002) Drug-related deaths in a university central hospital. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:479–482PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Morimoto T, Sakuma M, Matsui K et al (2010) Incidence of adverse drug events and medication errors in Japan: the JADE study. J Gen Intern Med 26:148–153PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morimoto T, Sakuma M, Matsui K et al (2010) Incidence of adverse drug events and medication errors in Japan: the JADE study. J Gen Intern Med 26:148–153PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fatal Surgical or Procedure-Related Complications: A Finnish Registry-Based Study
Authors
Tapio Hakala
Jaana Vironen
Sari Karlsson
Jarkko Pajarinen
Eero Hirvensalo
Hannu Paajanen
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2364-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

World Journal of Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue