Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014

Re-Validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery Tool (OTAS-D): Cultural Adaptation, Refinement, and Psychometric Evaluation

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The nontechnical and team skills of surgical teams are critical for safety and efficiency in the operating room. Assessment of nontechnical and team skills can facilitate improvement by encouraging both self-reflection and team reflection, identifying training needs, and informing operating room (OR) team training approaches. The observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS) tool is a well-validated and robust tool for capturing teamwork in the operating room. The aims of the present study were to systematically adapt and refine the OTAS for German-speaking OR staff and to test the adapted assessment tool (OTAS-D) for psychometric properties and metric equivalence.

Methods

The study was carried out in three stages: at stage 1, OTAS was translated into German. At stage 2, experienced German OR experts (surgeons, OR nurses, anesthetists) were interviewed. At stage 3, two blinded assessors observed 11 general surgical operations (general surgical and vascular procedures) and interrater reliability was tested for refined OTAS-D behavioral exemplars and scorings.

Results

The German OR experts confirmed the applicability and content validity of the vast majority of translated behavioral exemplars. After their evaluation, 32 items were changed slightly, six were changed substantially, and one item was added. During observations, perfect and substantial interobserver agreement was found for 77 behavioral exemplars (67.1 % of the items, kappa coefficient >0.60). Rating at all OTAS behaviors showed acceptable levels of reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.72).

Conclusions

The OTAS-D is a tool for valid and reliable assessment of nontechnical skills that contribute to safe and effective surgical performance in ORs staffed by German-speaking professionals. Furthermore, our study serves as an example for systematically adapting and customizing well-established observational tools across different healthcare environments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM et al (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621PubMedCrossRef Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM et al (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT et al (2009) Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197:678–685PubMedCrossRef Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT et al (2009) Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197:678–685PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D et al (2012) Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg 147:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D et al (2012) Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg 147:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–151PubMedCrossRef Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–151PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Armour Forse R, Bramble JD, McQuillan R (2011) Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery 150:771–778PubMedCrossRef Armour Forse R, Bramble JD, McQuillan R (2011) Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery 150:771–778PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230PubMedCrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Young-Xu Y, Neily J, Mills PD et al (2011) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical morbidity. Arch Surg 146:1368–1373PubMedCrossRef Young-Xu Y, Neily J, Mills PD et al (2011) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical morbidity. Arch Surg 146:1368–1373PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A et al (2008) Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg 247:699–706PubMedCrossRef Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A et al (2008) Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg 247:699–706PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Undre S, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2009) Observing and assessing surgical teams: the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS). In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer Surgery. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 83–102 Undre S, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2009) Observing and assessing surgical teams: the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS). In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer Surgery. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 83–102
13.
go back to reference Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Amato S, Basilico O, Bevilacqua L et al (2010) Observational team work assessment for surgery as quality and safety improvement tool. Ig Sanita Pubbl 66:357–374PubMed Amato S, Basilico O, Bevilacqua L et al (2010) Observational team work assessment for surgery as quality and safety improvement tool. Ig Sanita Pubbl 66:357–374PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pena ED (2007) Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev 78:1255–1264PubMedCrossRef Pena ED (2007) Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev 78:1255–1264PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sperber AD (2004) Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 126:S124–S128PubMedCrossRef Sperber AD (2004) Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 126:S124–S128PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L et al (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 4:145–151PubMedCrossRef Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L et al (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 4:145–151PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
21.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P (2009) The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18:104–108PubMedCrossRef Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P (2009) The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18:104–108PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43:1052–1075PubMedCrossRef Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43:1052–1075PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yule S, Rowley D, Flin R et al (2009) Experience matters: comparing novice and expert ratings of non-technical skills using the NOTSS system. ANZ J Surg 79:154–160PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Rowley D, Flin R et al (2009) Experience matters: comparing novice and expert ratings of non-technical skills using the NOTSS system. ANZ J Surg 79:154–160PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Russ S, Hull L, Rout S et al (2012) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training. Ann Surg 255:804–809PubMedCrossRef Russ S, Hull L, Rout S et al (2012) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training. Ann Surg 255:804–809PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hull L, Arora S, Symons NR et al (2012) Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national Guidelines on Program Requirements. Ann Surg 258:370–375CrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Symons NR et al (2012) Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national Guidelines on Program Requirements. Ann Surg 258:370–375CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Re-Validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery Tool (OTAS-D): Cultural Adaptation, Refinement, and Psychometric Evaluation
Publication date
01-02-2014
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2299-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue