Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2014

01-01-2014

A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Control Study of Volume Threshold for Chest Tube Removal Following Lobectomy

Authors: Ye Zhang, Hui Li, Bin Hu, Tong Li, Jin-bai Miao, Bin You, Yi-li Fu, Wen-qian Zhang

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a new volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy.

Methods

The prospective randomized single-blind control study included 90 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy for pathological conditions between March 2012 and September 2012. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: early removal group (chest tube removal at the drainage volume of 300 ml/24 h or less) and traditional management group (chest tube removal when the drainage volume is less than 100 ml/24 h). Criteria for the early removal group were established and met prior to chest tube removal. The volume and characteristics of drainage, time of drainage tube extraction, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded. All patients received standard care while in the hospital and a follow-up visit was performed 7 days after discharge from hospital.

Results

In accordance with the exit criteria, 20 patients were excluded from the study. The remaining 70 patients included in the final analysis were divided into two groups: early removal group (n = 41) and traditional management group (n = 29). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, and pathological evaluation of resection specimens. In eligible patients (n = 70), the mean volume of drainage 24 h after surgery was 300 ml, while the mean volume of drainage 48 h after surgery was 250 ml. The average daily drainage 48 h after surgery was significantly different than the average daily drainage 24 h after surgery (Z = −2.059, P = 0.039). The mean duration of chest tube placement was 44 h in the early removal group and 67 h in the traditional management group (P = 0.004). Patients who underwent early removal management had a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to the traditional management group (5 vs. 6 days, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed between the rates of pleural effusion development, thoracentesis, and postoperative complications 1 week after hospital discharge.

Conclusion

Early removal of the chest tube after lobectomy is feasible and safe and may shorten patient hospital stay and reduce morbidity without the added risk of postoperative complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D (2002) When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg 195(5):658–662PubMedCrossRef Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D (2002) When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg 195(5):658–662PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S (2009) Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial. J Inj Violence Res 1:33–36PubMedCrossRef Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S (2009) Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial. J Inj Violence Res 1:33–36PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McKenna RJ Jr, Mahtabifard A, Pickens A, Kusuanco D, Fuller CB (2007) Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 84(5):1663–1667PubMedCrossRef McKenna RJ Jr, Mahtabifard A, Pickens A, Kusuanco D, Fuller CB (2007) Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 84(5):1663–1667PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2008) Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(2):269–273PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2008) Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(2):269–273PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2006) The distribution and likelihood of lymph node metastasis based on the lobar location of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1969–1973PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2006) The distribution and likelihood of lymph node metastasis based on the lobar location of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1969–1973PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Demmy TL, James TA, Swanson SJ, McKenna RJ Jr, D’Amico TA (2005) Trouble shooting video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 79(5):1744–1752PubMedCrossRef Demmy TL, James TA, Swanson SJ, McKenna RJ Jr, D’Amico TA (2005) Trouble shooting video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 79(5):1744–1752PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McKenna RJ Jr (1995) VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 5(2):223–232PubMed McKenna RJ Jr (1995) VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 5(2):223–232PubMed
8.
go back to reference Göttgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC (2011) Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39(4):575–578PubMedCrossRef Göttgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC (2011) Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39(4):575–578PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tattersall DJ, Traill ZC, Gleeson FV (2000) Chest drains: does size matters? Clin Radiol 55:415–421PubMedCrossRef Tattersall DJ, Traill ZC, Gleeson FV (2000) Chest drains: does size matters? Clin Radiol 55:415–421PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miserocchi G, Beretta E, Rivolta I (2010) Respiratory mechanics and fluid dynamics after lung resection surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 20:345–357PubMedCrossRef Miserocchi G, Beretta E, Rivolta I (2010) Respiratory mechanics and fluid dynamics after lung resection surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 20:345–357PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Okur E, Baysungur V, Tezel C, Sevilgen G, Ergene G, Gokce M et al (2009) Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:32–35PubMedCrossRef Okur E, Baysungur V, Tezel C, Sevilgen G, Ergene G, Gokce M et al (2009) Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:32–35PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alex J, Ansari J, Bahalkar P, Agarwala S, Rehman MU, Saleh A et al (2003) Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1046–1049PubMedCrossRef Alex J, Ansari J, Bahalkar P, Agarwala S, Rehman MU, Saleh A et al (2003) Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1046–1049PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gómez-Caro A, Roca MJ, Torres J, Cascales P, Terol E, Castañer J et al (2006) Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains: a randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:562–566PubMedCrossRef Gómez-Caro A, Roca MJ, Torres J, Cascales P, Terol E, Castañer J et al (2006) Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains: a randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:562–566PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A (2010) Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin 20:413–420PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A (2010) Digital and smart chest drainage systems to monitor air leaks: the birth of a new era? Thorac Surg Clin 20:413–420PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bertholet JW, Joosten JJ, Keemers-Gels ME, van den Wildenberg FJ, Barendregt WB (2011) Chest tube management following pulmonary lobectomy: change in protocol results in fewer air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 12:28–31PubMedCrossRef Bertholet JW, Joosten JJ, Keemers-Gels ME, van den Wildenberg FJ, Barendregt WB (2011) Chest tube management following pulmonary lobectomy: change in protocol results in fewer air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 12:28–31PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miserocchi G, Negrini D (1997) Pleural space: pressure and fluid dynamics. In: Crystal RG, West JB (eds) The lung, scientific foundations, chap 88. Raven Press, New York, pp 1217–1225 Miserocchi G, Negrini D (1997) Pleural space: pressure and fluid dynamics. In: Crystal RG, West JB (eds) The lung, scientific foundations, chap 88. Raven Press, New York, pp 1217–1225
17.
go back to reference Light RW (2000) Physiology of pleural fluid production and benign pleural effusion. In: Shields TW, LoCicero J III, Ponn RB (eds), General thoracic surgery, vol 1, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 687–698 Light RW (2000) Physiology of pleural fluid production and benign pleural effusion. In: Shields TW, LoCicero J III, Ponn RB (eds), General thoracic surgery, vol 1, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 687–698
18.
go back to reference Gonfiotti A, Santini PF, Jaus M, Janni A, Lococo A et al (2011) Safety and effectiveness of a new fibrin pleural air leak sealant: a multicenter, controlled, prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1217–1224PubMedCrossRef Gonfiotti A, Santini PF, Jaus M, Janni A, Lococo A et al (2011) Safety and effectiveness of a new fibrin pleural air leak sealant: a multicenter, controlled, prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1217–1224PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moser C, Opitz I, Zhai W, Rousson V et al (2008) Autologous fibrin sealant reduces the incidence of prolonged air leak and duration of chest tube drainage after lung volume reduction surgery: a prospective randomized blinded study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:843–849PubMedCrossRef Moser C, Opitz I, Zhai W, Rousson V et al (2008) Autologous fibrin sealant reduces the incidence of prolonged air leak and duration of chest tube drainage after lung volume reduction surgery: a prospective randomized blinded study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:843–849PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Negrini D, Reed RK, Miserocchi G (1991) Permeability-surface area product and reflection coefficient of the parietal pleura in dogs. J Appl Physiol 71:2543–2547PubMed Negrini D, Reed RK, Miserocchi G (1991) Permeability-surface area product and reflection coefficient of the parietal pleura in dogs. J Appl Physiol 71:2543–2547PubMed
21.
go back to reference Brunelli A, Beretta E, Cassivi SD, Cerfolio RJ et al (2011) Consensus definitions to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space. A collaborative proposal by ESTS, AATS, STS, and GTSC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:291–297PubMedCrossRef Brunelli A, Beretta E, Cassivi SD, Cerfolio RJ et al (2011) Consensus definitions to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space. A collaborative proposal by ESTS, AATS, STS, and GTSC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:291–297PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hooper C, Lee YC, Maskell N et al (2010) Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline. Thorax 65(Suppl 2):114–117CrossRef Hooper C, Lee YC, Maskell N et al (2010) Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline. Thorax 65(Suppl 2):114–117CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Control Study of Volume Threshold for Chest Tube Removal Following Lobectomy
Authors
Ye Zhang
Hui Li
Bin Hu
Tong Li
Jin-bai Miao
Bin You
Yi-li Fu
Wen-qian Zhang
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2271-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

World Journal of Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue