Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2013

Open Access 01-10-2013

Two-day Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery under an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

Authors: Gustavo Rossi, Hernán Vaccarezza, Carlos A. Vaccaro, Ricardo E. Mentz, Victor Im, Adrián Alvarez, Guillermo Ojea Quintana

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The present study aims to examine the feasibility and safety of a two-day hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) under an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2010, 882 consecutive patients undergoing LCR were analyzed. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to whether their hospital stay was 2 days (group A) or longer (group B). Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data were compared. To identify independent predictive factors related to a short hospital stay, a multivariate analysis was also performed.

Results

Group A represented 10.3 % of this series (91 patients). There were no differences regarding age, gender, BMI, ASA, and previous abdominal surgeries between groups. Group A had a lower incidence of rectal cancer and anterior resections than group B (6.6 vs. 17.7 % [p = 0.006] and 14.3 vs. 23.4 % [p = 0.048]), respectively, and a lower mean operative time (170 min vs. 192 min; p = 0.002). Group A had a lower overall morbidity rate than group B (5.5 vs. 16.9 %; p = 0.004) and a lower incidence of surgery-related complications (5.5 vs. 14.9 %; p = 0.001). The overall conversion rate was 10 % (only one patient in group A required conversion), and the difference in conversion rate between groups was statistically significant (1.2 vs. 10.7 %; p = 0.003). Group A had a lower readmission rate (0 vs. 4.9 %; p = 0.089). Multivariate analysis showed that conversion, postoperative morbidity, and rectal prolapse were independently associated with the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

A two-day hospital stay after LCR is safe and feasible under an ERAS pathway, without compromising the readmission or complication rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Luo R et al (2012) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends. Arch Surg 147:724–731PubMedCrossRef Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Luo R et al (2012) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends. Arch Surg 147:724–731PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C et al (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–486 discussion 486–487PubMedCrossRef Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C et al (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–486 discussion 486–487PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Retchin SM, Penberthy L, Desch C et al (1997) Perioperative management of colon cancer under medicare risk programs. Arch Intern Med 157:1878–1884PubMedCrossRef Retchin SM, Penberthy L, Desch C et al (1997) Perioperative management of colon cancer under medicare risk programs. Arch Intern Med 157:1878–1884PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Baca I et al (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1–8PubMedCrossRef Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Baca I et al (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1–8PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou YB (2012) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1549–1554PubMedCrossRef Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou YB (2012) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1549–1554PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K et al (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47:271–277 discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K et al (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47:271–277 discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Di Fronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX (1999) Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection. Arch Surg 134:941–945 discussion 945–946PubMedCrossRef Di Fronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX (1999) Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection. Arch Surg 134:941–945 discussion 945–946PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rix T, Jourdan L (2002) “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery (Br J Surg 2001; 88:1533–1538). Br J Surg 89:625PubMed Rix T, Jourdan L (2002) “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery (Br J Surg 2001; 88:1533–1538). Br J Surg 89:625PubMed
10.
go back to reference Delaney CP (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89PubMedCrossRef Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chan AC, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630PubMedCrossRef Chan AC, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 43:61–65PubMedCrossRef Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 43:61–65PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Behrns KE, Kircher AP, Galanko JA et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:217–221PubMedCrossRef Behrns KE, Kircher AP, Galanko JA et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:217–221PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ et al (2001) “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ et al (2001) “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS et al (2007) Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94:890–893PubMedCrossRef Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS et al (2007) Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94:890–893PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ et al (2009) 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1239–1243PubMedCrossRef Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ et al (2009) 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1239–1243PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U et al (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection-associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1273–1279PubMedCrossRef Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U et al (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection-associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1273–1279PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Garlipp B, Oberlander H et al (2011) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: impact on short- and long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:923–927PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Garlipp B, Oberlander H et al (2011) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: impact on short- and long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:923–927PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference White I, Greenberg R, Itah R et al (2011) Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer. JSLS 15:182–187PubMedCrossRef White I, Greenberg R, Itah R et al (2011) Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer. JSLS 15:182–187PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M et al (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97:754–758PubMedCrossRef Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M et al (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97:754–758PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Two-day Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery under an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway
Authors
Gustavo Rossi
Hernán Vaccarezza
Carlos A. Vaccaro
Ricardo E. Mentz
Victor Im
Adrián Alvarez
Guillermo Ojea Quintana
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2155-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

World Journal of Surgery 10/2013 Go to the issue