Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2013

01-10-2013

Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery

Authors: Rachel L. G. M. Blom, Mark van Heijl, Willem A. Bemelman, Markus W. Hollmann, Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl, Olivier R. C. Busch, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A recent development in gastrointestinal surgery is the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Evidence regarding the benefit of these programs in patients undergoing esophageal surgery is scarce. We investigated the feasibility and possible benefit of a perioperative ERAS program in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignant disease.

Methods

The ERAS program was initiated in 2009. Patients who underwent esophagectomy and were treated according to the ERAS program were included. Items of ERAS included preoperative nutrition, early extubation, early removal of nasogastric tube, and early mobilization. Primary outcome parameters were hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications. Outcome parameters in the ERAS cohort were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection in the year prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol. A feasibility analysis was performed among a sample of ERAS patients to determine the number of achieved items per patient.

Results

Between 2008 and August 2010, 181 patients in our department underwent esophagectomy. Of these, 103 patients were included in the ERAS program (ERAS+ group) and were compared to 78 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy in 2008 (ERAS– group). Overall hospital stay was 14 days versus 15 days (ERAS+ and ERAS–, respectively; p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in either group. The percentage of achieved items varied between 42 and 93 % per item.

Conclusions

The implementation of an ERAS program in esophageal surgery was feasible and resulted in a small but significant reduction in overall hospital stay, whereas overall morbidity was not affected.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von MM et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von MM et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-012-1772-0 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Chappell D, Jacob M (2010) Influence of non-ventilatory options on postoperative outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 24:267–281PubMedCrossRef Chappell D, Jacob M (2010) Influence of non-ventilatory options on postoperative outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 24:267–281PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al. (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD007635 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al. (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD007635
9.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW et al (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:1126–1132PubMedCrossRef Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW et al (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:1126–1132PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Blom RL et al. (2010) [Outcomes of 16 years of oesophageal surgery: low postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154: A1156 (in Dutch) van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Blom RL et al. (2010) [Outcomes of 16 years of oesophageal surgery: low postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154: A1156 (in Dutch)
12.
go back to reference Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM et al (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236:376–384PubMedCrossRef Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM et al (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236:376–384PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D et al (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 231:635–643PubMedCrossRef Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D et al (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 231:635–643PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A et al (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97:714–718PubMedCrossRef Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A et al (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97:714–718PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB et al (2009) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg 8:21CrossRef van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB et al (2009) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg 8:21CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Caumo W, Hidalgo MP, Schmidt AP et al (2002) Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia 57:740–746PubMedCrossRef Caumo W, Hidalgo MP, Schmidt AP et al (2002) Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia 57:740–746PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575PubMedCrossRef Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery
Authors
Rachel L. G. M. Blom
Mark van Heijl
Willem A. Bemelman
Markus W. Hollmann
Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl
Olivier R. C. Busch
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2135-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

World Journal of Surgery 10/2013 Go to the issue