Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2012

01-10-2012

Comparable Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopic and Open Emergent Restorative Colectomy: Outcomes From the ACS NSQIP

Authors: Nikiforos Ballian, Natalie Weisensel, Victoria Rajamanickam, Eugene F. Foley, Charles P. Heise, Bruce A. Harms, Gregory D. Kennedy

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective in the management of common abdominal emergencies. However, there is currently a lack of data about its use for emergency colorectal surgery. We hypothesized that laparoscopy can improve the postoperative outcomes of emergency restorative colon resection.

Methods

Adult patients undergoing emergent open and laparoscopic colon resection with primary anastomosis were retrieved from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2005 to 2008 inclusive. Demographic and operative characteristics, laboratory values, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing laparoscopic and open colon resection using univariate analyses, multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score analyses.

Results

A total of 341 laparoscopic (9.6 %) and 3211 (90.4 %) open colon resections were included. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a significantly lower prevalence of co-morbidities and better postoperative outcomes. On multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was an independent predictor of a longer operating time (p < 0.001) and shorter total (p = 0.013) and postoperative (p = 0.004) hospital stays, but it did not affect the need for intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.488), the 30-day reoperation rates (p = 0.969), or mortality (p = 0.417). After adjusted propensity score analysis, postoperative morbidity (p = 0.833) and mortality (p = 0.568) were comparable in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery.

Conclusions

On a national scale, laparoscopic emergent colon resections are being performed in a small number of patients, who have favorable co-morbidity characteristics and improved postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopic emergent colon resection with primary anastomosis has postoperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those seen with the open approach, and it reduces the total and postoperative length of hospital stay.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed
2.
go back to reference Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kiviluoto T, Sirén J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef Kiviluoto T, Sirén J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V et al (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 249:596–601PubMedCrossRef Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V et al (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 249:596–601PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM et al (2001) Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15:837–842PubMedCrossRef Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM et al (2001) Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15:837–842PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF et al (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients. Surg Endosc 14:911–914PubMedCrossRef Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF et al (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients. Surg Endosc 14:911–914PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fowkes L, Krishna K, Menon A et al (2008) Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10:373–378PubMedCrossRef Fowkes L, Krishna K, Menon A et al (2008) Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10:373–378PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Li JC, Ng SS, Lee JF et al (2009) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for complicated cecal diverticulitis: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:479–483CrossRef Li JC, Ng SS, Lee JF et al (2009) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for complicated cecal diverticulitis: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:479–483CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chouillard E, Maggiori L, Ata T et al (2007) Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef Chouillard E, Maggiori L, Ata T et al (2007) Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ et al (2011) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg 212:844–854PubMedCrossRef Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ et al (2011) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg 212:844–854PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281PubMedCrossRef D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8:25–30PubMed Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8:25–30PubMed
16.
go back to reference Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK et al (2001) Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1441–1445PubMedCrossRef Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK et al (2001) Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1441–1445PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32:454–458. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9400-0 PubMedCrossRef Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32:454–458. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-007-9400-0 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Scheer A, Martel G, Moloo H et al (2009) Laparoscopic colon surgery: does operative time matter? Dis Colon Rectum 52:1746–1752PubMedCrossRef Scheer A, Martel G, Moloo H et al (2009) Laparoscopic colon surgery: does operative time matter? Dis Colon Rectum 52:1746–1752PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL et al (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL et al (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618PubMedCrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Watanabe K, Funayama Y, Fukushima K et al (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open subtotal colectomy for severe ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 52:640–645PubMedCrossRef Watanabe K, Funayama Y, Fukushima K et al (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open subtotal colectomy for severe ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 52:640–645PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boyle E, Ridgway PF, Keane FB et al (2008) Laparoscopic colonic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: minimal surgery, minimal access and minimal hospital stay. Colorectal Dis 10:911–915PubMedCrossRef Boyle E, Ridgway PF, Keane FB et al (2008) Laparoscopic colonic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: minimal surgery, minimal access and minimal hospital stay. Colorectal Dis 10:911–915PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738PubMedCrossRef Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014 Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014
Metadata
Title
Comparable Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopic and Open Emergent Restorative Colectomy: Outcomes From the ACS NSQIP
Authors
Nikiforos Ballian
Natalie Weisensel
Victoria Rajamanickam
Eugene F. Foley
Charles P. Heise
Bruce A. Harms
Gregory D. Kennedy
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1694-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

World Journal of Surgery 10/2012 Go to the issue