Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2012

01-04-2012

Polyacrylamide Gel Injections for Breast Augmentation: Management of Complications in 106 Patients, a Multicenter Study

Authors: Dmytro Unukovych, Vasyl Khrapach, Marie Wickman, Annelie Liljegren, Volodymyr Mishalov, Gennadiy Patlazhan, Kerstin Sandelin

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Polyacrylamide gel (PAAG) was first manufactured in Ukraine in the late 1980s and introduced as a biomaterial for “breast augmentation without surgery.” Since it is prohibited in most countries, PAAG injections are rare nowadays, but their consequences and long-term complications can be crucial.

Methods

We identified 106 patients consecutively operated on for PAAG complications at three teaching Ukrainian hospitals between 1998 and 2009. All relevant sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were collected. Forty-five (42%) patients were available for clinical follow-up.

Results

The majority (88%) had had bilateral PAAG injections. The mean volume of injected PAAG was 230 ml/breast (range = 50–400). Mean age at injection was 29 years (range = 17–49) and the mean time from the injection to complications was 6.1 years (SD = 4.1). Symptoms preceding debridement were pain in 85 patients (80%), breast hardening in 79 (74%), breast deformity in 77 (73%), lumps in 57 (54%), gel migration in 39 (37%), fistulas in 17 (16%), and gel leakage in 12 (11%). The surgical interventions in 199 breasts included gel evacuation alone in 107 (54%) or in combination with partial mastectomy in 65 (33%), partial mastectomy and partial pectoralis muscle resection in 12 (6%), or subcutaneous mastectomy in 15 (7%). Of the 199 operated breasts, 86 (43%) immediate and 58 (29%) delayed implant-based breast reconstructions were performed.

Conclusion

Injections of PAAG can cause irreversible damage to the breast necessitating complex debridement procedures, even mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Despite numerous surgical interventions, gel remnants are still found on subsequent breast imaging. Although PAAG is prohibited in many countries, different types of injections with unknown long-term effects are currently being used. Making the public aware of the problems of injectables for breast augmentation is warranted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chasan PE (2007) The history of injectable silicone fluids for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:2034–2040, discussion 2041–2033PubMedCrossRef Chasan PE (2007) The history of injectable silicone fluids for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:2034–2040, discussion 2041–2033PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference [No authors listed] (2005) Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 24(Suppl 2):21–50 [No authors listed] (2005) Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 24(Suppl 2):21–50
3.
go back to reference Cheng NX, Zhang YL, Luo SK et al (2011) Late hematoma, seroma, and galactocele in breasts injected with polyacrylamide gel. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:365–372CrossRef Cheng NX, Zhang YL, Luo SK et al (2011) Late hematoma, seroma, and galactocele in breasts injected with polyacrylamide gel. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:365–372CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cheng NX, Wang YL, Wang JH et al (2002) Complications of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel. Aesthet Plast Surg 26:375–382CrossRef Cheng NX, Wang YL, Wang JH et al (2002) Complications of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel. Aesthet Plast Surg 26:375–382CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pallua N, Wolter TP (2010) A 5-year assessment of safety and aesthetic results after facial soft-tissue augmentation with polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid): a prospective multicenter study of 251 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1797–1804PubMedCrossRef Pallua N, Wolter TP (2010) A 5-year assessment of safety and aesthetic results after facial soft-tissue augmentation with polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid): a prospective multicenter study of 251 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1797–1804PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference de Cassia Novaes W, Berg A (2003) Experiences with a new nonbiodegradable hydrogel (Aquamid): a pilot study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:376–380PubMedCrossRef de Cassia Novaes W, Berg A (2003) Experiences with a new nonbiodegradable hydrogel (Aquamid): a pilot study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:376–380PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zarini E, Supino R, Pratesi G et al (2004) Biocompatibility and tissue interactions of a new filler material for medical use. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:934–942PubMedCrossRef Zarini E, Supino R, Pratesi G et al (2004) Biocompatibility and tissue interactions of a new filler material for medical use. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:934–942PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Christensen LH, Breiting VB, Aasted A et al (2003) Long-term effects of polyacrylamide hydrogel on human breast tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1883–1890PubMedCrossRef Christensen LH, Breiting VB, Aasted A et al (2003) Long-term effects of polyacrylamide hydrogel on human breast tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1883–1890PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lemperle G, Rullan PP, Gauthier-Hazan N (2006) Avoiding and treating dermal filler complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:92S–107SPubMedCrossRef Lemperle G, Rullan PP, Gauthier-Hazan N (2006) Avoiding and treating dermal filler complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:92S–107SPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Qiao Q, Wang X, Sun J et al (2005) Management for postoperative complications of breast augmentation by injected polyacrylamide hydrogel. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:156–161 (discussion 162)CrossRef Qiao Q, Wang X, Sun J et al (2005) Management for postoperative complications of breast augmentation by injected polyacrylamide hydrogel. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:156–161 (discussion 162)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Luo SK, Chen GP, Sun ZS et al (2011) Our strategy in complication management of augmentation mammaplasty with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection in 235 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(6):731–737PubMedCrossRef Luo SK, Chen GP, Sun ZS et al (2011) Our strategy in complication management of augmentation mammaplasty with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection in 235 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(6):731–737PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brandberg Y, Malm M, Rutqvist LE et al (1999) A prospective randomised study (named SVEA) of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction. Study design, patients’ preoperative problems and expectations. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 33:209–216PubMedCrossRef Brandberg Y, Malm M, Rutqvist LE et al (1999) A prospective randomised study (named SVEA) of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction. Study design, patients’ preoperative problems and expectations. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 33:209–216PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236PubMedCrossRef Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Teo SY, Wang SC (2008) Radiologic features of polyacrylamide gel mammoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:W89–W95PubMedCrossRef Teo SY, Wang SC (2008) Radiologic features of polyacrylamide gel mammoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:W89–W95PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lui CY, Ho CM, Iu PP et al (2008) Evaluation of MRI findings after polyacrylamide gel injection for breast augmentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:677–688PubMedCrossRef Lui CY, Ho CM, Iu PP et al (2008) Evaluation of MRI findings after polyacrylamide gel injection for breast augmentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:677–688PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Xu LY, Kong XQ, Tian ZX et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging on complications of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel. Chin Med J (Engl) 119:1311–1314 Xu LY, Kong XQ, Tian ZX et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging on complications of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel. Chin Med J (Engl) 119:1311–1314
19.
go back to reference Lee CJ, Kim SG, Kim L et al (2004) Unfavorable findings following breast augmentation using injected polyacrylamide hydrogel. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1967–1968PubMedCrossRef Lee CJ, Kim SG, Kim L et al (2004) Unfavorable findings following breast augmentation using injected polyacrylamide hydrogel. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1967–1968PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cheng NX, Xu SL, Deng H et al (2006) Migration of implants: a problem with injectable polyacrylamide gel in aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:215–225CrossRef Cheng NX, Xu SL, Deng H et al (2006) Migration of implants: a problem with injectable polyacrylamide gel in aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:215–225CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xiao ZB, Liu Y (2008) The relationship between breast cancer and breast augmentation with injected polyacrylamide gel: two case reports. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(8):981–982PubMedCrossRef Xiao ZB, Liu Y (2008) The relationship between breast cancer and breast augmentation with injected polyacrylamide gel: two case reports. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(8):981–982PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cheng NX, Liu LG, Hui L et al (2009) Breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) injection. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:563–569CrossRef Cheng NX, Liu LG, Hui L et al (2009) Breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) injection. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:563–569CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Abdallah A, Wesemann A, Saklaoui O et al (2009) Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer after augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel and review of the literature. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 49:35–38PubMedCrossRef Abdallah A, Wesemann A, Saklaoui O et al (2009) Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer after augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel and review of the literature. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 49:35–38PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Golicki D, Niewada M, Jakubczyk M et al (2010) Self-assessed health status in Poland: EQ-5D findings from the Polish valuation study. Pol Arch Med Wewn 120:276–281PubMed Golicki D, Niewada M, Jakubczyk M et al (2010) Self-assessed health status in Poland: EQ-5D findings from the Polish valuation study. Pol Arch Med Wewn 120:276–281PubMed
Metadata
Title
Polyacrylamide Gel Injections for Breast Augmentation: Management of Complications in 106 Patients, a Multicenter Study
Authors
Dmytro Unukovych
Vasyl Khrapach
Marie Wickman
Annelie Liljegren
Volodymyr Mishalov
Gennadiy Patlazhan
Kerstin Sandelin
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1273-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

World Journal of Surgery 4/2012 Go to the issue