Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2011

01-04-2011

Prediction of Anastomotic Leak and its Prognosis in Digestive Surgery

Authors: Yoshio Haga, Yasuo Wada, Hitoshi Takeuchi, Koji Ikejiri, Masakazu Ikenaga

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a dangerous postoperative complication in gastrointestinal surgery. The present study focuses on whether our prediction scoring system, “Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress” (E-PASS), could predict occurrence of AL and its prognosis in various kinds of gastrointestinal surgical procedures.

Methods

We prospectively investigated parameters of E-PASS, absence or presence of AL, and in-hospital mortality in 6,005 patients who underwent elective digestive surgery with alimentary tract reconstruction in 45 acute care hospitals in Japan between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2007.

Results

Incidences of AL were 19.6% for esophagectomy via right thoracotomy and laparotomy, 11.7% for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 7.4% for low anterior resection, 4.0% for total gastrectomy, 1.8% for open distal gastrectomy, 1.3% for open colectomy, for an overall incidence of 4.1%. The incidence in each procedure significantly correlated with median value of surgical stress score of the E-PASS (R = 0.78, n = 11, p = 0.0048). The incidences of AL increased when Total Risk Points (TRP) of the E-PASS increased; 1.1% at the TRP range of <500, 2.8% at 500 to <1,000, 4.8% at 1,000 to <1,500, and 13.6% at ≥1,500 (p < 0.0001). In patients who suffered from AL, an in-hospital mortality rate at TRP < 1,000 was significantly lower than that at TRP of ≥1,000 (1.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.00019).

Conclusions

The E-PASS, requiring only nine variables, may be useful in predicting AL and its prognosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR et al (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76:579–585PubMedCrossRef Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR et al (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76:579–585PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT et al (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931PubMedCrossRef Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT et al (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725PubMedCrossRef Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M et al (2008) Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:265–270PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M et al (2008) Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:265–270PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rullier R, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358PubMedCrossRef Rullier R, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145:371–376PubMedCrossRef Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145:371–376PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zakrison T, Nascimento BA, Tremblay LN et al (2007) Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. World J Surg 31:1627–1634PubMedCrossRef Zakrison T, Nascimento BA, Tremblay LN et al (2007) Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. World J Surg 31:1627–1634PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1999) Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 29:219–225PubMedCrossRef Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1999) Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 29:219–225PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H et al (2004) Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) for a surgical audit in elective digestive surgery. Surgery 135:586–594PubMedCrossRef Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H et al (2004) Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) for a surgical audit in elective digestive surgery. Surgery 135:586–594PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikei S, Wada Y et al (2001) Evaluation of an Estimation of a Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system to predict postoperative risk: a multicenter prospective study. Surg Today 31:569–574PubMedCrossRef Haga Y, Ikei S, Wada Y et al (2001) Evaluation of an Estimation of a Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system to predict postoperative risk: a multicenter prospective study. Surg Today 31:569–574PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H et al (2002) Estimation of surgical costs using a prediction scoring system Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress. Arch Surg 137:481–485PubMedCrossRef Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H et al (2002) Estimation of surgical costs using a prediction scoring system Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress. Arch Surg 137:481–485PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Haga Y, Ikejiri K, Wada Y et al (2010) A multicenter prospective study of surgical audit systems. Ann Surg 31:569–574 Haga Y, Ikejiri K, Wada Y et al (2010) A multicenter prospective study of surgical audit systems. Ann Surg 31:569–574
13.
go back to reference Yamashita S, Haga Y, Nemoto E et al (2004) E-PASS (The Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) scoring system helps the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in thoracic surgery. Eur Surg Res 36:249–255PubMedCrossRef Yamashita S, Haga Y, Nemoto E et al (2004) E-PASS (The Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) scoring system helps the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in thoracic surgery. Eur Surg Res 36:249–255PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yamashita S, Haga Y, Nemoto E et al (2006) Comparison of surgical outcome using the prediction scoring system of E-PASS for thoracic surgery. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:391–395PubMedCrossRef Yamashita S, Haga Y, Nemoto E et al (2006) Comparison of surgical outcome using the prediction scoring system of E-PASS for thoracic surgery. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:391–395PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tang T, Walsh SR, Fanshawe TR et al (2007) Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) as a predictor of immediate outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Am J Surg 194:176–182PubMedCrossRef Tang T, Walsh SR, Fanshawe TR et al (2007) Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) as a predictor of immediate outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Am J Surg 194:176–182PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tang TY, Walsh SR, Fanshawe TR et al (2007) Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:505–513PubMedCrossRef Tang TY, Walsh SR, Fanshawe TR et al (2007) Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:505–513PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hirose J, Mizuta H, Ide J et al (2008) Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) to predict the postoperative risk for hip fracture in elder patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1447–1452PubMedCrossRef Hirose J, Mizuta H, Ide J et al (2008) Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) to predict the postoperative risk for hip fracture in elder patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1447–1452PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hirose J, Mizuta H, Ide J et al (2008) E-PASS for predicting postoperative risk with hip fracture: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2833–2841PubMedCrossRef Hirose J, Mizuta H, Ide J et al (2008) E-PASS for predicting postoperative risk with hip fracture: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2833–2841PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Doglietto GB, Gallitelli L, Pacelli F et al (1996) Protein-sparing therapy after major abdominal surgery: lack of clinical effects. Ann Surg 223:357–362PubMedCrossRef Doglietto GB, Gallitelli L, Pacelli F et al (1996) Protein-sparing therapy after major abdominal surgery: lack of clinical effects. Ann Surg 223:357–362PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM. A scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360PubMedCrossRef Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM. A scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13PubMed Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13PubMed
22.
go back to reference Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 240:260–268PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg 240:260–268PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hogan B, Winter D, Broe D et al (2008) Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:767–771PubMedCrossRef Hogan B, Winter D, Broe D et al (2008) Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:767–771PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Traverso LW, Shinchi H, Low DE (2004) Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 187:604–608PubMedCrossRef Traverso LW, Shinchi H, Low DE (2004) Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 187:604–608PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prediction of Anastomotic Leak and its Prognosis in Digestive Surgery
Authors
Yoshio Haga
Yasuo Wada
Hitoshi Takeuchi
Koji Ikejiri
Masakazu Ikenaga
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0922-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

World Journal of Surgery 4/2011 Go to the issue