Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2011

01-03-2011

Simplified Alternative to the TRISS Method for Resource-Constrained Settings

Authors: Shinji Nakahara, Masao Ichikawa, Akio Kimura

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We developed simple methods of risk adjustment for evaluating the quality of injury care (predicting survival probabilities of the injured) by fully utilizing routinely collected data in injury surveillance and clinical practices. Widely used methods of risk adjustment require additional data that are difficult to collect in resource-constrained settings.

Methods

We developed logistic regression models that predict survival using data obtained from 9,840 victims aged 15 years or older with blunt traumatic injuries who were registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank, Japan’s national trauma registry, between January 2004 and December 2007. The models included three predictors: age, an anatomical injury severity parameter such as a simplified severity categorization (minor, moderate, and severe) described in the Injury Surveillance Guidelines, and a physiological status parameter. The models’ abilities to predict survival probabilities were evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROCC).

Results

The simplified three-predictor models showed good performance with the AUROCC ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. In particular, the models with a consciousness level indicator as a physiological parameter showed a high AUROCC, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94, which was not much different from the performance of the widely used method that shows an AUROCC of 0.96.

Conclusions

Simplified methods of risk adjustment that require only routinely collected data will facilitate evaluation and improvement in the quality of injury care in resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries, where injuries are a growing public health concern.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mock C, Lormand JD, Goosen J et al. (2004) Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, World Health Organization, Geneva Mock C, Lormand JD, Goosen J et al. (2004) Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, World Health Organization, Geneva
3.
go back to reference Mock C, Nguyen S, Quansah R et al (2006) Evaluation of trauma care capabilities in four countries using the WHO-IATSIC Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care. World J Surg 30:946–956CrossRefPubMed Mock C, Nguyen S, Quansah R et al (2006) Evaluation of trauma care capabilities in four countries using the WHO-IATSIC Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care. World J Surg 30:946–956CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mock C, Juillard C, Brundage S et al (eds) (2009) Guidelines for Trauma Quality Improvement Programmes. World Health Organization, Geneva Mock C, Juillard C, Brundage S et al (eds) (2009) Guidelines for Trauma Quality Improvement Programmes. World Health Organization, Geneva
5.
go back to reference Nakahara S, Saint S, Sann S et al (2009) Evaluation of trauma care resources in health centers and referral hospitals in Cambodia. World J Surg 33:874–885CrossRefPubMed Nakahara S, Saint S, Sann S et al (2009) Evaluation of trauma care resources in health centers and referral hospitals in Cambodia. World J Surg 33:874–885CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
8.
go back to reference Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J et al (1996) ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma 41:380–386CrossRefPubMed Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J et al (1996) ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma 41:380–386CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim Y, Jung KY, Kim CY et al (2000) Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS). J Trauma 48:280–285CrossRefPubMed Kim Y, Jung KY, Kim CY et al (2000) Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS). J Trauma 48:280–285CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
12.
go back to reference Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54:671–678CrossRefPubMed Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54:671–678CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kilgo PD, Osler TM, Meredith W (2003) The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring. J Trauma 55:599–606CrossRefPubMed Kilgo PD, Osler TM, Meredith W (2003) The worst injury predicts mortality outcome the best: rethinking the role of multiple injuries in trauma outcome scoring. J Trauma 55:599–606CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Osler TM (2006) Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available. J Trauma 60:1002–1008CrossRefPubMed Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Osler TM (2006) Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available. J Trauma 60:1002–1008CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Moore L, Lavoie A, Le Sage N et al (2008) Consensus or data-derived anatomic injury severity scoring? J Trauma 64:420–426CrossRefPubMed Moore L, Lavoie A, Le Sage N et al (2008) Consensus or data-derived anatomic injury severity scoring? J Trauma 64:420–426CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Holder Y, Peden M, Krug E et al (eds) (2001) Injury Surveillance Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva Holder Y, Peden M, Krug E et al (eds) (2001) Injury Surveillance Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva
17.
go back to reference Nakahara S, Jayatilleke AU, Ichikawa M et al (2008) Feasibility of standardized injury surveillance and reporting: a comparison of data from four Asian nations. Inj Prev 14:106–112CrossRefPubMed Nakahara S, Jayatilleke AU, Ichikawa M et al (2008) Feasibility of standardized injury surveillance and reporting: a comparison of data from four Asian nations. Inj Prev 14:106–112CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ichikawa M, Nakahara S, Wakai S (2005) Factors related to participation in the Japan Trauma Data Bank. J Jpn Assoc Acute Med 16:552–556 Ichikawa M, Nakahara S, Wakai S (2005) Factors related to participation in the Japan Trauma Data Bank. J Jpn Assoc Acute Med 16:552–556
20.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kimura A (2010) Logistic regression models for Japanese blunt trauma victims: second report. J Jpn Assoc Surg Trauma 24:321–326 Kimura A (2010) Logistic regression models for Japanese blunt trauma victims: second report. J Jpn Assoc Surg Trauma 24:321–326
22.
go back to reference Kimura A (2010) Logistic regression models for Japanese blunt trauma victims. J Jpn Assoc Surg Trauma 24:15–20 Kimura A (2010) Logistic regression models for Japanese blunt trauma victims. J Jpn Assoc Surg Trauma 24:15–20
23.
go back to reference Nakahara S, Taira Y, Takahashi M et al. (2008) Extracting information from free-texts in computerized medical records of traffic injury patients admitted to a critical care medical center in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human and computers, November 20–23, Nagaoka, Japan, pp 215–220 Nakahara S, Taira Y, Takahashi M et al. (2008) Extracting information from free-texts in computerized medical records of traffic injury patients admitted to a critical care medical center in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human and computers, November 20–23, Nagaoka, Japan, pp 215–220
24.
go back to reference Zafar H, Rehmani R, Raja AJ et al (2002) Registry based trauma outcome: perspective of a developing country. Emerg Med J 19:391–394CrossRefPubMed Zafar H, Rehmani R, Raja AJ et al (2002) Registry based trauma outcome: perspective of a developing country. Emerg Med J 19:391–394CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lane PL, Doig G, Mikrogianakis A et al (1996) An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. J Trauma 41:731–734CrossRefPubMed Lane PL, Doig G, Mikrogianakis A et al (1996) An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. J Trauma 41:731–734CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nakahara S, Saint S, Sann S et al (2010) Exploring referral systems for injured patients in low-income countries: a case study from Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 25:319–327CrossRefPubMed Nakahara S, Saint S, Sann S et al (2010) Exploring referral systems for injured patients in low-income countries: a case study from Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 25:319–327CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C et al (2000) An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area. J Trauma 49:212–220CrossRefPubMed DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C et al (2000) An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area. J Trauma 49:212–220CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML et al (2010) Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma 68:761–770CrossRefPubMed Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML et al (2010) Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma 68:761–770CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Simplified Alternative to the TRISS Method for Resource-Constrained Settings
Authors
Shinji Nakahara
Masao Ichikawa
Akio Kimura
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0865-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

World Journal of Surgery 3/2011 Go to the issue