Top

World Journal of Surgery

Published in:

Open Access 01-03-2010

Standard Outpatient Re-Evaluation for Patients Not Admitted to the Hospital After Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Abdominal Pain

Authors: Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet, Rutger F. R. Bakker, Hans C. Flu, Jos W. S. Merkus, Jaap F. Hamming, Paul J. Breslau

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2010

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients who are not admitted to the hospital after emergency department surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain.

Methods

All patients seen at the emergency department between June 2005 and July 2006 for acute abdominal pain were included in a prospective study using a structured diagnosis and management flowchart. Patients not admitted to the hospital were given appointments for re-evaluation at the outpatient clinic within 24 h. All clinical parameters, radiological results, diagnostic considerations, and management proposals were scored prospectively.

Results

Five-hundred patients were included in this analysis. For 148 patients (30%), the final diagnosis was different from the diagnosis after initial evaluation. Eighty-five patients (17%) had a change in management after re-evaluation, and 20 of them (4%) were admitted to the hospital for an operation. Only 6 patients (1.2%) had a delay in diagnosis and treatment, which did not cause extra morbidity.

Conclusions

Standard outpatient re-evaluation is a safe and effective means of improving diagnostic accuracy and helps to adapt management for patients that are not admitted to the hospital after surgical consultation for acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.

Powers RD, Guertler AT (1995) Abdominal pain in the ED: stability and change over 20 years. Am J Emerg Med 13:301–303CrossRefPubMed

Hayes R (2004) Abdominal pain: general imaging strategies. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 4):L123–L137PubMed

Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S et al (2005) Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol 15:2435–2447CrossRefPubMed

World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: 10th Revision (2007) Available at http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/ Accessed December 8 2009

Veen MR, Lardenoye JW, Kastelein GW et al (1999) Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice. Eur J Surg 165:421–424CrossRefPubMed

Puylaert JB (2003) Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1227–1242CrossRefPubMed

Allemann F, Cassina P, Rothlin M et al (1999) Ultrasound scans done by surgeons for patients with acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 165:966–970CrossRefPubMed

Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE III et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396PubMed

Gerhardt RT, Nelson BK, Keenan S et al (2005) Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the Guideline for Abdominal Pain in the ED Setting (GAPEDS) Phase 1 Study. Am J Emerg Med 23:709–717CrossRefPubMed

10.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (2008) Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 81:362–378CrossRefPubMed

12.

Vander Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1994) Diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy: a prospective audit. Gut 35:1617–1621CrossRefPubMed

13.

Paterson-Brown S (1993) Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80:279–283CrossRefPubMed

14.

de Dombal FT (1979) Acute abdominal pain—an O.M.G.E. survey. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 5629–5643

15.

Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Diagnostic pitfalls and accuracy of diagnosis in acute abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:1126–1131CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sheridan WG, White AT, Havard T et al (1992) Non-specific abdominal pain: the resource implications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:181–185PubMed

17.

Onur OE, Guneysel O, Unluer EE et al (2008) “Outpatient follow-up” or “active clinical observation” in patients with nonspecific abdominal pain in the emergency department. A randomized clinical trial. Minerva Chir 63:9–15PubMed

Title: Standard Outpatient Re-Evaluation for Patients Not Admitted to the Hospital After Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Abdominal Pain
Authors: Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet
Rutger F. R. Bakker
Hans C. Flu
Jos W. S. Merkus
Jaap F. Hamming
Paul J. Breslau
Publication date: 01-03-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0334-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Standard Outpatient Re-Evaluation for Patients Not Admitted to the Hospital After Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Abdominal Pain

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Intrabiliary Rupture of Hepatic Echinococcosis, a Risk Factor for Developing Postoperative Morbidity: A Cohort Study

Predictive Factors Improving Survival After Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Classification, an Important Step to Improve the Management of Patients with an Open Abdomen: Reply to Letter

Emergency and Essential Surgical Services in Afghanistan: Still a Missing Challenge

The Middle Thyroid Vein: Anatomical and Surgical Aspects

Seven Sins of Humanitarian Medicine