Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
World Journal of Surgery
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2010

01-01-2010

Mechanical Compression Versus Subcutaneous Heparin Therapy in Postoperative and Posttrauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Robert W. Eppsteiner, Jennifer J. Shin, Jonas Johnson, Rob M. van Dam

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The risk of postoperative venous thromboembolic disease is as high as 30%, with an associated fatality risk of 1%. Therefore, prophylaxis is essential, but the optimal regimen remains controversial. This study was designed to systematically review and quantitatively summarize the impact of mechanical compression versus subcutaneous heparin on venous thromboembolic disease and posttreatment bleeding in postsurgical and posttrauma patients.

Methods

Computerized searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 2008 were performed and supplemented with manual searches. We included studies that had: (1) a patient population undergoing surgery or admitted immediately posttrauma, (2) a randomized comparison of prophylaxis with mechanical compression versus subcutaneous heparin, (3) outcome measured in terms of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or bleeding.

Results

Two reviewers independently extracted data from the original articles, which represented 16 studies, including a total of 3,887 subjects. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The pooled relative risk for mechanical compression compared with subcutaneous heparin was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72, 1.61) for DVT and 1.03 (95% CI 0.48, 2.22) for PE. Mechanical compression was associated with a significantly reduced risk of postoperative bleeding compared with subcutaneous heparin (risk ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.31, 0.70). Subgroup analyses by heparin type suggested that low molecular weight heparin may reduce risk of DVT compared with compression (relative risk 1.80; 95% CI 1.16, 2.79) but remains similarly associated with an increased risk of bleeding.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the overall bleeding risk profile favors the use of compression over heparin, with the benefits in term of venous thromboembolic disease prophylaxis being similar between groups. Subgroup analyses suggest that low molecular weight heparin may have a differential effect; this observation should be further evaluated in future studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Qadan M, Tyson M, McCafferty MH, Hohmann SF, Polk HC Jr (2008) Venous thromboembolism in elective operations: balancing the choices. Surgery 144:654–661CrossRefPubMed
2.
Hitos K, Cannon M, Cannon S, Garth S, Fletcher JP (2007) Effect of leg exercises on popliteal venous blood flow during prolonged immobility of seated subjects: implications for prevention of travel-related deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 5:1890–1895CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bajzar L, Chan AK, Massicotte MP, Mitchell LG (2006) Thrombosis in children with malignancy. Curr Opin Pediatr 18:1–9CrossRefPubMed
4.
Barrett J, Hamilton W (2006) Malignancy and deep vein thrombosis. Br J Gen Pract 56:886PubMed
5.
Spain DA, Bergamini TM, Hoffmann JF, Carrillo EH, Richardson JD (1998) Comparison of sequential compression devices and foot pumps for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in high-risk trauma patients. Am Surg 64:522–526PubMed
6.
Freedman KB, Brookenthal KR, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Williams S, Lonner JH (2000) A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:929–938PubMed
7.
Cook D, McMullin J, Hodder R, Heule M, Pinilla J, Dodek P, Stewart T (2001) Prevention and diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: a Canadian survey. Crit Care 5:336–342CrossRefPubMed
8.
Wu EC, Barba CA (2000) Current practices in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 10:7–14CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kurtoglu M, Yanar H, Bilsel Y, Guloglu R, Kizilirmak S, Buyukkurt D, Granit V (2004) Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin. World J Surg 28:807–811CrossRefPubMed
10.
Ginzburg E, Cohn SM, Lopez J, Jackowski J, Brown M, Hameed SM (2003) Randomized clinical trial of intermittent pneumatic compression and low molecular weight heparin in trauma. Br J Surg 90:1338–1344CrossRefPubMed
11.
Warwick D, Harrison J, Glew D, Mitchelmore A, Peters TJ, Donovan J (1998) Comparison of the use of a foot pump with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1158–1166PubMed
12.
Nicolaides AN, Fernandes e Fernandes J, Pollock AV (1980) Intermittent sequential pneumatic compression of the legs in the prevention of venous stasis and postoperative deep venous thrombosis. Surgery 87:69–76PubMed
13.
Nicolaides AN, Miles C, Hoare M, Jury P, Helmis E, Venniker R (1983) Intermittent sequential pneumatic compression of the legs and thromboembolism-deterrent stockings in the prevention of postoperative deep venous thrombosis. Surgery 94:21–25PubMed
14.
Maxwell GL, Synan I, Dodge R, Carroll B, Clarke-Pearson DL (2001) Pneumatic compression versus low molecular weight heparin in gynecologic oncology surgery: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 98:989–995CrossRefPubMed
15.
Clarke-Pearson DL, Synan IS, Dodge R, Soper JT, Berchuck A, Coleman RE (1993) A randomized trial of low-dose heparin and intermittent pneumatic calf compression for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after gynecologic oncology surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1146–1154PubMed
16.
Pitto RP, Hamer H, Heiss-Dunlop W, Kuehle J (2004) Mechanical prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement a randomised clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:639–642CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kosir MA, Schmittinger L, Barno-Winarski L, Duddella P, Pone M, Perales A, Lange P, Brish LK, McGee K, Beleski K, Pawlak J, Mammen E, Sajahan NP, Kozol RA (1998) Prospective double-arm study of fibrinolysis in surgical patients. J Surg Res 74:96–101CrossRefPubMed
18.
Rasmussen A, Hansen PT, Lindholt J, Poulsen TD, Toftdahl DB, Gram J, Toftgaard C, Jespersen J (1988) Venous thrombosis after abdominal surgery A comparison between subcutaneous heparin and antithrombotic stockings, or both. J Med 19(3–4):193–201PubMed
19.
Blanchard J, Meuwly JY, Leyvraz PF, Miron MJ, Bounameaux H, Hoffmeyer P, Didier D, Schneider PA (1999) Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total knee replacement. Randomised comparison between a low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) and mechanical prophylaxis with a foot-pump system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:654–659CrossRefPubMed
20.
Coe NP, Collins RE, Klein LA, Bettmann MA, Skillman JJ, Shapiro RM, Salzman EW (1978) Prevention of deep vein thrombosis in urological patients: a controlled, randomized trial of low-dose heparin and external pneumatic compression boots. Surgery 83:230–234PubMed
21.
Santori FS, Vitullo A, Stopponi M, Santori N, Ghera S (1994) Prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis in total hip replacement. Comparison of heparin and foot impulse pump. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:579–583PubMed
22.
Camporese G, Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Noventa F, Verlato F, Simioni P, Ntita K, Salmistraro G, Frangos C, Rossi F, Cordova R, Franz F, Zucchetta P, Kontothanassis D, Andreozzi GM (2008) Low-molecular-weight heparin versus compression stockings for thromboprophylaxis after knee arthroscopy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 149:73–82PubMed
23.
Knudson MM, Collins JA, Goodman SB, McCrory DW (1992) Thromboembolism following multiple trauma. J Trauma 32:2–11PubMedCrossRef
24.
Norgren L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Magyar G, Lindstrand A, Albrechtsson U (1998) Prevention of deep vein thrombosis in knee arthroplasty. Preliminary results from a randomized controlled study of low molecular weight heparin vs. foot pump compression. Int Angiol 17:93–96PubMed
25.
DerSimonian R, Kacker R (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 28:105–114CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560CrossRefPubMed
28.
Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101CrossRefPubMed
29.
Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1119–1129CrossRefPubMed
30.
Koch A, Bouges S, Ziegler S, Dinkel H, Daures JP, Victor N (1997) Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in thrombosis prophylaxis after major surgical intervention: update of previous meta-analyses. Br J Surg 84:750–759CrossRefPubMed
31.
Howard AW, Aaron SD (1998) Low molecular weight heparin decreases proximal and distal deep venous thrombosis following total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Thromb Haemost 79:902–906PubMed
32.
Nurmohamed MT, Rosendaal FR, Buller HR, Dekker E, Hommes DW, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E (1992) Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet 340(8812):152–156CrossRefPubMed
33.
Handoll HH, Farrar MJ, McBirnie J, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Milne AA, Gillespie WJ (2002) Heparin, low molecular weight heparin and physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following surgery for hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000305PubMed
34.
Cornwell EE III, Chang D, Velmahos G, Jindal A, Baker D, Phillips J, Bonar J, Campbell K (2002) Compliance with sequential compression device prophylaxis in at-risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis. Am Surg 68:470–473PubMed
35.
Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS, Oder D, Murray JA, Shekelle P (2000) Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidence-based report–part I: analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma 49:132–139CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Mechanical Compression Versus Subcutaneous Heparin Therapy in Postoperative and Posttrauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Robert W. Eppsteiner
Jennifer J. Shin
Jonas Johnson
Rob M. van Dam
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0284-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

World Journal of Surgery 1/2010 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Quality of Life in Stoma Patients: Appropriate and Inappropriate Stoma Sites

OriginalPaper

Intraoperative Assessment of Sentinel Node Using Imprint Cytology

OriginalPaper

More Than 25 Years of Surgical Treatment of Hydatid Cysts in a Nonendemic Area Using the “Frozen Seal” Method

OriginalPaper

Role of Growth Factors on Human Parathyroid Adenoma Cell Proliferation

OriginalPaper

Association of Increasing Surgeon Age with Decreasing In-Hospital Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

OriginalPaper

Early Reoperation After Laparoscopic Fundoplication: The Importance of Routine Postoperative Contrast Studies