Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2009

Open Access 01-11-2009

The Outcome of the Axillofemoral Bypass: A Retrospective Analysis of 45 Patients

Authors: Marjolein H. Liedenbaum, Froukje J. Verdam, David Spelt, Hans G. W. de Groot, Jan van der Waal, Lijckle van der Laan

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to retrospectively analyze outcomes of axillofemoral bypass (AxFB) operations performed in patients with severe comorbidities.

Methods

All patients (n = 45) who received an AxFB between 1990 and 2005 for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD, n = 35) or infectious aortic disease (IAD, n = 10) were included. Information on patency of the bypass and mortality was retrieved from patient records. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to illustrate survival rates, limb salvage, and primary and secondary patency.

Results

Included patients had several comorbidities and a high operative risk. In this group, a 30-day mortality rate of 20% was found: 17% for the AIOD group, and 30% for the IAD group. During 5-year follow-up 20 patients died, of which 15 during the first year after operation. Survival rates were at 64 and 41% at 1 and 5 years and limb salvage rates were 84% for both these years. Primary patency rates at 1 and 5 years were 72 and 58%, respectively, and secondary patency rates were 86% at both time points.

Conclusions

High mortality rates were found in AIOD or IAD patients who received an AxFB. However, for high-risk patients with an already reduced life expectancy, the AxFB remains an alternative with acceptable patency rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seeger JM, Pretus HA, Welborn MB et al (2000) Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. J Vasc Surg 32:451–459PubMedCrossRef Seeger JM, Pretus HA, Welborn MB et al (2000) Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. J Vasc Surg 32:451–459PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Moneta GL et al (1999) Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection. J Vasc Surg 30:76–83PubMedCrossRef Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Moneta GL et al (1999) Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection. J Vasc Surg 30:76–83PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jamsen T, Tulla H, Loponen P (1999) Axillofemoral bypass operations in Kuopio University Hospital 1985–1996. Ann Chir Gynaecol 88:269–275PubMed Jamsen T, Tulla H, Loponen P (1999) Axillofemoral bypass operations in Kuopio University Hospital 1985–1996. Ann Chir Gynaecol 88:269–275PubMed
4.
go back to reference Passman MA, Taylor LM, Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, McConnell DB, Porter JM (1996) Comparison of axillofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 23:263–271PubMedCrossRef Passman MA, Taylor LM, Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, McConnell DB, Porter JM (1996) Comparison of axillofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 23:263–271PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Martin D, Katz SG (2000) Axillofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Am J Surg 180:100–103PubMedCrossRef Martin D, Katz SG (2000) Axillofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Am J Surg 180:100–103PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Onohara T, Komori K, Kume M et al (2000) Multivariate analysis of long-term results after an axillobifemoral and aortobifemoral bypass in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 41:905–910 Onohara T, Komori K, Kume M et al (2000) Multivariate analysis of long-term results after an axillobifemoral and aortobifemoral bypass in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 41:905–910
7.
go back to reference Young RM, Cherry KJ, Davis PM, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Panneton JM, Hallett JW (1999) The results of in situ prosthetic replacement for infected aortic grafts. Am J Surg 178:136–140PubMedCrossRef Young RM, Cherry KJ, Davis PM, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Panneton JM, Hallett JW (1999) The results of in situ prosthetic replacement for infected aortic grafts. Am J Surg 178:136–140PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nevelsteen A, Wouters L, Suy R (1991) Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a 25-year survey. Eur J Vasc Surg 5:179–186PubMedCrossRef Nevelsteen A, Wouters L, Suy R (1991) Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a 25-year survey. Eur J Vasc Surg 5:179–186PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oderich GS, Bower TC, Cherry KJ, Panneton JM, Sullivan TM, Noel AA, Carmo M, Cha S, Kalra M, Gloviczki P (2006) Evolution from axillofemoral to in situ prosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of aortic graft infections at a single center. J Vasc Surg 43:1166–1174PubMedCrossRef Oderich GS, Bower TC, Cherry KJ, Panneton JM, Sullivan TM, Noel AA, Carmo M, Cha S, Kalra M, Gloviczki P (2006) Evolution from axillofemoral to in situ prosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of aortic graft infections at a single center. J Vasc Surg 43:1166–1174PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Davidovic L, Vasic D, Maksimovic R, Kostic D, Markovic D, Markovic M (2004) Aortobifemoral grafting: factors influencing long-term results. Vascular 12:171–178PubMed Davidovic L, Vasic D, Maksimovic R, Kostic D, Markovic D, Markovic M (2004) Aortobifemoral grafting: factors influencing long-term results. Vascular 12:171–178PubMed
11.
go back to reference De Vries SO, Hunnink MG (1997) Results of aortic bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 26:558–569PubMedCrossRef De Vries SO, Hunnink MG (1997) Results of aortic bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 26:558–569PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H et al (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anesth 77:217–222 Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H et al (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anesth 77:217–222
13.
go back to reference BOA Study Group (2000) Efficacy of oral anticoagulants compared with aspirin after infrainguinal bypass surgery (The Dutch Bypass Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin study): a randomised trial. Lancet 355(9201):346–351CrossRef BOA Study Group (2000) Efficacy of oral anticoagulants compared with aspirin after infrainguinal bypass surgery (The Dutch Bypass Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin study): a randomised trial. Lancet 355(9201):346–351CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schneider JR, McDaniel MD, Walsh DB et al (1992) Axillofemoral bypass: outcome and hemodynamic results in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 15:952–962PubMedCrossRef Schneider JR, McDaniel MD, Walsh DB et al (1992) Axillofemoral bypass: outcome and hemodynamic results in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 15:952–962PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Olson CJ, Edwards JM, Taylor LM et al (2002) Repeat axillofemoral grafting as treatment for axillofemoral graft occlusion. Arch Surg 137:1364–1367PubMedCrossRef Olson CJ, Edwards JM, Taylor LM et al (2002) Repeat axillofemoral grafting as treatment for axillofemoral graft occlusion. Arch Surg 137:1364–1367PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, Bandyk DF, Towne JBJ (1990) Graft excision and extra-anatomic revascularization: the treatment of choice for the septic aortic prosthesis. Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 31:327–332 Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, Bandyk DF, Towne JBJ (1990) Graft excision and extra-anatomic revascularization: the treatment of choice for the septic aortic prosthesis. Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 31:327–332
17.
go back to reference Daenens K, Fourneau I, Nevelsteen A (2003) Ten-year experience in autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 25:240–245PubMedCrossRef Daenens K, Fourneau I, Nevelsteen A (2003) Ten-year experience in autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 25:240–245PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kieffer E, Gomes D, Chiche L et al (2004) Allograft replacement for infrarenal aortic graft infection: early and late results in 179 patients. J Vasc Surg 39:1009–1017PubMedCrossRef Kieffer E, Gomes D, Chiche L et al (2004) Allograft replacement for infrarenal aortic graft infection: early and late results in 179 patients. J Vasc Surg 39:1009–1017PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johnson WC, Lee KK (1999) Comparative evaluation of externally supported Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic bypasses for femorofemoral and axillofemoral arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 30:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef Johnson WC, Lee KK (1999) Comparative evaluation of externally supported Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic bypasses for femorofemoral and axillofemoral arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 30:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Qiao A, Liu Y, Guo Z (2006) Wall shear stresses in small and large two-way bypass grafts. Med Eng Phys 28:251–258PubMedCrossRef Qiao A, Liu Y, Guo Z (2006) Wall shear stresses in small and large two-way bypass grafts. Med Eng Phys 28:251–258PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Outcome of the Axillofemoral Bypass: A Retrospective Analysis of 45 Patients
Authors
Marjolein H. Liedenbaum
Froukje J. Verdam
David Spelt
Hans G. W. de Groot
Jan van der Waal
Lijckle van der Laan
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0189-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

World Journal of Surgery 11/2009 Go to the issue