Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
World Journal of Surgery
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2009

Open Access 01-07-2009

Overcoming Distance: Video-Conferencing as a Clinical and Educational Tool Among Surgeons

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since the 1960s, there has been substantial development in the uses of video-conferencing (VC) among medical personnel, including surgeons who have adopted the technology.

Methods

A report on our own experience with VC was combined with a comprehensive PubMed search with the key words telepresence, video-conferencing, video-teleconferencing, telementoring and surgery, trauma, follow-up, education, and multidisciplinary teams. A search through two peer-reviewed telemedicine journals—Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and Telemedicine and e-Health Journal—and references of all included papers and identified additional reports was conducted.

Results

A total of 517 articles were identified with 51 relevant manuscripts, which included the key phrases. VC is widely used among surgeons for telementoring surgical procedures and in trauma and emergency medicine. Furthermore, VC is widely used by multidisciplinary teams and for the follow-up of patients after surgery.

Conclusions

VC is a common clinical tool for surgeons and provides a great opportunity to alter surgical practice and to offer patients the best expertise in surgical treatment despite long distances, especially in rural areas.
Literature
1.
Aucar JA, Doarn CR, Sargsyan A et al (1998) Use of the Internet for long-term clinical follow-up. Telemed J 4:371–374PubMed
2.
DeBakey ME (1995) Telemedicine has now come of age. Telemed J 1:3–4
3.
Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, Plohman K, Ho K (2008) Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: lessons learned. Telemed J E Health 14:720–725PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
6.
Chandhanayingyong C, Tangtrakulwanich B, Kiriratnikom T (2007) Teleconsultation for emergency orthopaedic patients using the multimedia messaging service via mobile phones. J Telemed Telecare 13:193–196PubMedCrossRef
7.
Waran V, Selladurai BM, Bahuri NF et al (2008) Teleconferencing using multimedia messaging service (MMS) for long-range consultation of patients with neurosurgical problems in an acute situation. J Trauma 64:362–365 (discussion 365)PubMedCrossRef
8.
Johnsen E, Bolle SR (2008) To see or not to see—better dispatcher-assisted CPR with video-calls? A qualitative study based on simulated trials. Resuscitation 78:320–326PubMedCrossRef
9.
Merrell RC, Doarn CR (2008) Is it time for a telemedicine breakthrough? Telemed J E Health 14:505–506PubMedCrossRef
10.
Go PM, Payne JH Jr, Satava RM, Rosser JC (1996) Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world. Surg Endosc 10:105–106PubMedCrossRef
11.
Olsen J, Nordengen R, Espeland L, Edvardsen H (2006) OrtoPol@r: distance learning in orthodontic postgraduate training—a pilot project. Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, Tromsø. NST report ISBN 82-92092-76-5
12.
Holland AJ, Soundappan SV, Oldmeadow W (2008) Videoconferencing surgical tutorials: bridging the gap. ANZ J Surg 78:297–301PubMedCrossRef
13.
Hadley GP, Mars M (2008) Postgraduate medical education in paediatric surgery: videoconferencing—a possible solution for Africa? Pediatr Surg Int 24:223–226PubMedCrossRef
14.
Stain SC, Mitchell M, Belue R et al (2005) Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship. Am J Surg 189:81–84PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kingsnorth A, Vranch A, Campbell J (2000) Training for surgeons using digital satellite television and videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):S29–S31PubMedCrossRef
16.
Demartines N, Mutter D, Vix M et al (2000) Assessment of telemedicine in surgical education and patient care. Ann Surg 231:282–291PubMedCrossRef
17.
Lim EC, Seet RC (2008) In-house medical education: redefining tele-education. Teach Learn Med 20:193–195PubMedCrossRef
18.
Pradeep PV, Mishra A, Mohanty BN et al (2007) Reinforcement of endocrine surgery training: impact of telemedicine technology in a developing country context. World J Surg 31:1665–1671PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
21.
Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Followfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7:935–943PubMedCrossRef
22.
Demartines N, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Harder F (2000) Preliminary assessment of the value and effect of expert consultation in telemedicine. J Am Coll Surg 190:466–470PubMedCrossRef
23.
Norum J, Jordhoy MS (2006) A university oncology department and a remote palliative care unit linked together by email and videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 12:92–96PubMedCrossRef
24.
Dickson-Witmer D, Petrelli NJ, Witmer DR et al (2008) A statewide community cancer center videoconferencing program. Ann Surg Oncol 15:3058–3064PubMedCrossRef
25.
Fielding RG, Macnab M, Swann S et al (2005) Attitudes of breast cancer professionals to conventional and telemedicine-delivered multidisciplinary breast meetings. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 2):S29–S34PubMedCrossRef
26.
Delaney G, Jacob S, Iedema R, Winters M, Barton M (2004) Comparison of face-to-face and videoconferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. Australas Radiol 48:487–492PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kunkler IH, Fielding RG, Brebner J et al (2005) A comprehensive approach for evaluating telemedicine-delivered multidisciplinary breast cancer meetings in southern Scotland. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 1):71–73PubMedCrossRef
28.
Kunkler IH, Prescott RJ, Lee RJ et al (2007) TELEMAM: a cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision making. Eur J Cancer 43:2506–2514PubMedCrossRef
29.
Davison AG, Eraut CD, Haque AS et al (2004) Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings. J Telemed Telecare 10:140–143PubMedCrossRef
30.
Stalfors J, Bjorholt I, Westin T (2005) A cost analysis of participation via personal attendance versus telemedicine at a head and neck oncology multidisciplinary team meeting. J Telemed Telecare 11:205–210PubMedCrossRef
31.
Axford AT, Askill C, Jones AJ (2002) Virtual multidisciplinary teams for cancer care. J Telemed Telecare 8(Suppl 2):3–4PubMedCrossRef
32.
Latifi R (2008) Telepresence and telemedicine in trauma and emergency. Stud Health Technol Inform 131:275–280PubMed
33.
34.
Hagen O, Bolle SR (2006) Videobased emergency medical interaction. Norwegian National Centre of Telemedicine. Tromsø. NST report ISBN 82-92092-75-7
35.
Duchesne JC, Kyle A, Simmons J et al (2008) Impact of telemedicine upon rural trauma care. J Trauma 64:92–97 (discussion 97–98)PubMedCrossRef
36.
Stormo A, Sollid S, Stormer J, Ingebrigtsen T (2004) Neurosurgical teleconsultations in northern Norway. J Telemed Telecare 10:135–139PubMedCrossRef
37.
Latifi R, Weinstein RS, Porter JM et al (2007) Telemedicine and telepresence for trauma and emergency care management. Scand J Surg 96:281–289PubMed
38.
Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Brear M (2008) Impact of an ultrabroadband emergency department telemedicine system on the care of acutely ill patients and clinicians’ work. Med J Aust 188:704–708PubMed
39.
Todder D, Matar M, Kaplan Z (2007) Acute-phase trauma intervention using a videoconference link circumvents compromised access to expert trauma care. Telemed J E Health 13:65–67PubMedCrossRef
40.
Rumpsfeld M, Arild E, Norum J, Breivik E (2005) Telemedicine in haemodialysis: a university department and two remote satellites linked together as one common workplace. J Telemed Telecare 11:251–255PubMedCrossRef
41.
Moseng D (2000) Teledermatology: experiences from northern Norway. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 120:1893–1895PubMed
42.
Nordal EJ, Moseng D, Kvammen B, Lochen ML (2001) A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations. J Telemed Telecare 7:257–265PubMedCrossRef
43.
Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R et al (2002) Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:1961–1968PubMedCrossRef
44.
Haukipuro K, Ohinmaa A, Winblad I, Linden T, Vuolis S (2000) The feasibility of telemedicine for orthopaedic outpatient clinics: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 6:193–198PubMedCrossRef
45.
Harno K, Arajarvi E, Paavola T, Carlson C, Viikinkoski P (2001) Clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of patient referral by videoconferencing in orthopaedics. J Telemed Telecare 7:219–225PubMedCrossRef
46.
Ohinmaa A, Vuolio S, Haukipuro K, Winblad I (2002) A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting. J Telemed Telecare 8:283–289PubMedCrossRef
47.
48.
Wilbright WA, Birke JA, Patout CA, Varnado M, Horswell R (2004) The use of telemedicine in the management of diabetes-related foot ulceration: a pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care 17:232–238PubMedCrossRef
49.
Merrell RC, Doarn CR (2008) In Memoriam: Michael E. DeBakey, MD. 1908–2008. Telemed J E Health 14:503–504PubMedCrossRef
50.
Schulam PG, Docimo SG, Saleh W et al (1997) Telesurgical mentoring: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 11:1001–1005PubMedCrossRef
51.
Rinde E, Hartviksen G (2000) Telelaparoscopy: user experiences. Telenor ASA, Tromsø. Telenor report 93/2000 ISSN 0809-1021
52.
Cubano M, Poulose BK, Talamini MA (1999) Long distance telementoring: a novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc 13:673–678PubMedCrossRef
53.
Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E et al (2000) Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endourol 14:493–496PubMedCrossRef
54.
Rodrigues Netto N, Mitre AI Jr, Lima SV et al (2003) Telementoring between Brazil and the United States: initial experience. J Endourol 17:217–220PubMedCrossRef
55.
Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668PubMed
56.
Bruschi M, Micali S, Porpiglia F et al (2005) Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience. Surg Endosc 19:836–840PubMedCrossRef
57.
Anvari M (2007) Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg 31:1545–1550PubMedCrossRef
58.
Byrne JP, Mughal MM (2000) Telementoring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a useful adjunct in training and assessment of higher surgical trainees. Br J Surg 87:362–373CrossRef
59.
Di Valentino M, Alerci M, Bogen M (2005) Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study. J Endovasc Ther 12:200–205PubMedCrossRef
60.
Gambadauro P, Magos A (2008) NEST (network enhanced surgical training): a PC-based system for telementoring in gynaecological surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:222–225PubMedCrossRef
61.
Maruping LM, Agarwal R (2004) Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. J Appl Psychol 89:975–990PubMedCrossRef
62.
Rafiq A, Moore JA, Zhao X, Doarn CR, Merrell RC (2004) Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg 239:567–573PubMedCrossRef
63.
Rosser JC Jr, Young SM, Klonsky J (2007) Telementoring: an application whose time has come. Surg Endosc 21:1458–1463PubMedCrossRef
64.
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A et al (2005) Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov 12:327–331PubMedCrossRef
65.
Lee BR, Moore R (2000) International telementoring: a feasible method of instruction. World J Urol 18:296–298PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Overcoming Distance: Video-Conferencing as a Clinical and Educational Tool Among Surgeons
Publication date
01-07-2009
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0036-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

World Journal of Surgery 7/2009 Go to the issue

Letter

Limitations of “Classic” Risk Factors to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response for Operable Breast Cancer

Letter

Breast-Conserving Surgery in Asian Women: Benefits and Potential Harms: Reply to Letter

OriginalPaper

Impact of General Versus Local Anesthesia on Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Following Carotid Endarterectomy: GALA Study Subgroup Analysis

OriginalPaper

Sacral Nerve Terminal Motor Latency in Patients With or Without Soiling More Than 2 Years After Low Anterior Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

OriginalPaper

Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial

OriginalPaper

Total Pelvic Exenteration for Primary and Recurrent Malignancies