Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2009

01-07-2009

Benefits Versus Risks: A Prospective Audit

Feeding Jejunostomy During Esophagectomy

Author: Vikas Gupta

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this prospectively collected database is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and utility of postoperative jejunostomy feeding in terms of achieving nutritional goals and evaluating gastrointestinal and mechanical complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Methods

The study included 204 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for various benign and malignant conditions. All patients underwent Witzel feeding jejunostomy at the time of laparotomy. Patients were followed prospectively to record nutritional intake, type of feed administered, rate progression, tolerance, and complications either mechanical or gastrointestinal.

Results

Feeding jejunostomy could be performed in 99.5% patients; 6.0% of the patients had a blocked catheter during the course of feeding. The target calorie requirement could be achieved in 78% of patients by third day. In all, 95% of patients could be successfully fed exclusively by jejunostomy catheter during the postoperative period. Minor gastrointestinal complications developed in 15% of the patients and were managed by slowing the rate of infusion or administering medication. Patients spent a mean of 16.67 ± 22.00 days (range 0–46 days) on jejunostomy feeding after surgery; however, 13% required prolonged jejunostomy feeding beyond 30 days. Altogether, 64% of the patients with an anastomotic leak and 50% of the patients with postoperative complications required catheter jejunostomy feeding beyond 30 days. The mean duration for which jejunostomy tube feeding was used was significantly higher for patients who developed anastomotic disruptions (33.05 ± 16.24 vs. 14.69 ± 19.04 days; p = 0.000) and postoperative complications (26.67 ± 25.56 vs. 14.52 ± 18.64 days; p = 0.000) when compared to those without disruption or complications. There were no serious complications related to the feeding catheter that required reintervention. There was no difference in the mean body weight or weight deficit at the end of 10 days and at 1 month in patients who developed complications or anastomotic disruption when compared to their counterparts. No patient died as a result of a complication related to the feeding jejunostomy.

Conclusions

Tube jejunostomy feeding is an effective method for providing nutritional support in patients undergoing esophagectomy, and it allows home support for the subset who fail to thrive. Prolonged tube feeding was continued in patients developing anastomotic disruptions and postoperative complications. Feeding jejunostomy has a definitive role to play in the management of the patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davies AR, Forshaw MJ, Khan AA, Noorani AS, Patel VM, Strauss DC, Mason RC (2008) Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution. World J Surg Oncol 6:88PubMedCrossRef Davies AR, Forshaw MJ, Khan AA, Noorani AS, Patel VM, Strauss DC, Mason RC (2008) Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution. World J Surg Oncol 6:88PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJB (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thoracic Surg 72:306–313CrossRef Hulscher JB, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJB (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thoracic Surg 72:306–313CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL (2007) Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies. Ann Surg 246:363–374PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL (2007) Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies. Ann Surg 246:363–374PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Baigrie RJ, Devitt PG, Watkin DS (1996) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesophagogastric surgery: a prospective randomized comparison. Aust N Z J Surg 66:668–670PubMedCrossRef Baigrie RJ, Devitt PG, Watkin DS (1996) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesophagogastric surgery: a prospective randomized comparison. Aust N Z J Surg 66:668–670PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jenkinson AD, Lim J, Agrawal N, Menzies D (2007) Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy in esophagogastric cancer. Surg Endosc 21:299–302PubMedCrossRef Jenkinson AD, Lim J, Agrawal N, Menzies D (2007) Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy in esophagogastric cancer. Surg Endosc 21:299–302PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Verhoef C, Tran KT, Tilanus HW (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 94:31–35PubMedCrossRef Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Verhoef C, Tran KT, Tilanus HW (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 94:31–35PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ryan AM, Rowley SP, Healy LA, Flood PM, Ravi N, Reyonalds JV (2006) Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit. Clin Nutr 25:386–393PubMedCrossRef Ryan AM, Rowley SP, Healy LA, Flood PM, Ravi N, Reyonalds JV (2006) Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit. Clin Nutr 25:386–393PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yagi M, Hashimoto T, Nezuka H, Ito H, Tani T, Shimizu K, Miwa K (1999) Complications associated with enteral nutrition using catheter jejunostomy after esophagectomy. Surg Today 29:214–218PubMedCrossRef Yagi M, Hashimoto T, Nezuka H, Ito H, Tani T, Shimizu K, Miwa K (1999) Complications associated with enteral nutrition using catheter jejunostomy after esophagectomy. Surg Today 29:214–218PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Watters JM, Kirkpatrick SM, Norris SB, Shamji FM, Wells GA (1997) Immediate postoperative enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg 226:369–380PubMedCrossRef Watters JM, Kirkpatrick SM, Norris SB, Shamji FM, Wells GA (1997) Immediate postoperative enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg 226:369–380PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brock MV, Venbrux AC, Heitmiller RF (2000) Percutaneous replacement jejunostomy after esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 4:407–410PubMedCrossRef Brock MV, Venbrux AC, Heitmiller RF (2000) Percutaneous replacement jejunostomy after esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 4:407–410PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ruiz-Elizalde AR, Frischer JS, Cowles RA (2008) Button-loop feeding jejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg, Sep 30 [Epub ahead of print] Ruiz-Elizalde AR, Frischer JS, Cowles RA (2008) Button-loop feeding jejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg, Sep 30 [Epub ahead of print]
13.
go back to reference Slappy AL, Odell JA, Hinder RA, McKinney JM (2006) Jejunopexy for selectively placed fluoroscopically guided percutaneous jejunal feeding tubes. Ann Thorac Surg 82:756–758PubMedCrossRef Slappy AL, Odell JA, Hinder RA, McKinney JM (2006) Jejunopexy for selectively placed fluoroscopically guided percutaneous jejunal feeding tubes. Ann Thorac Surg 82:756–758PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harbinson SP (2007) Intubation of the stomach and small intestine. In: Yeo CJ, Dempsy DT, Klein JH, Pemberton JH, Peters JH (eds) Surgery of the alimentary tract, vol 1, 6th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 749–759 Harbinson SP (2007) Intubation of the stomach and small intestine. In: Yeo CJ, Dempsy DT, Klein JH, Pemberton JH, Peters JH (eds) Surgery of the alimentary tract, vol 1, 6th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 749–759
15.
go back to reference Sica GS, Sujendran V, Wheeler, Soin B, Maynard N (2005) Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 91:276–279PubMedCrossRef Sica GS, Sujendran V, Wheeler, Soin B, Maynard N (2005) Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 91:276–279PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gerndt SJ, Orringer MB (1994) Tube jejunostomy as an adjunct to esophagectomy. Surgery 115:164–169PubMed Gerndt SJ, Orringer MB (1994) Tube jejunostomy as an adjunct to esophagectomy. Surgery 115:164–169PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bueno JT, Schattner MA, Barrera R, Gerdes H, Bains M, Shike M (2003) Endoscopic placement of direct percutaneous jejunostomy tubes in patients with complications after esophagectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 57:536–540PubMedCrossRef Bueno JT, Schattner MA, Barrera R, Gerdes H, Bains M, Shike M (2003) Endoscopic placement of direct percutaneous jejunostomy tubes in patients with complications after esophagectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 57:536–540PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Venskutonis D, Bradulskis S, Adamonsi K, Urbanavicius L (2007) Witzel catheter feeding jejunostomy: is it safe? Dig Surg 24:349–353PubMedCrossRef Venskutonis D, Bradulskis S, Adamonsi K, Urbanavicius L (2007) Witzel catheter feeding jejunostomy: is it safe? Dig Surg 24:349–353PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wakefield SE, Mansell NJ, Baigrie RJ, Dowling BL (1995) Use of a feeding jejunostomy after oesophagogastric surgery. Br J Surg 82:811–813PubMedCrossRef Wakefield SE, Mansell NJ, Baigrie RJ, Dowling BL (1995) Use of a feeding jejunostomy after oesophagogastric surgery. Br J Surg 82:811–813PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Reichle RL, Venbrux AC, Heitmiller RF, Osterman FA (1995) Percutaneous jejunostomy replacement in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:939–942PubMedCrossRef Reichle RL, Venbrux AC, Heitmiller RF, Osterman FA (1995) Percutaneous jejunostomy replacement in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:939–942PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pramesh CS, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Sharma S (2002) Enteral feeding access with feeding jejunostomy is advisable after esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:666–672CrossRef Pramesh CS, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Sharma S (2002) Enteral feeding access with feeding jejunostomy is advisable after esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:666–672CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McCarter MD, Gomez ME, Daly JM (1997) Early postoperative enteral feeding following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 1:278–285PubMedCrossRef McCarter MD, Gomez ME, Daly JM (1997) Early postoperative enteral feeding following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 1:278–285PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J (2008) A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 21:422–429PubMedCrossRef Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J (2008) A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 21:422–429PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Moesta KT, Schlag PM (2004) Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stent. Ann Surg 240:801–807PubMedCrossRef Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Moesta KT, Schlag PM (2004) Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stent. Ann Surg 240:801–807PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gupta NM, Gupta R, Manikyam SR, Gupta V (2001) Minimizing cervical esophageal anastomotic complications by a modified technique. Am J Surg 181:534–539PubMedCrossRef Gupta NM, Gupta R, Manikyam SR, Gupta V (2001) Minimizing cervical esophageal anastomotic complications by a modified technique. Am J Surg 181:534–539PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Finley FJ, Lamy A, Clifton J, Evans KG, Fradet G, Nelems B (1995) Gastrointestinal function following esophagectomy for malignancy. Am J Surg 169:471–475PubMedCrossRef Finley FJ, Lamy A, Clifton J, Evans KG, Fradet G, Nelems B (1995) Gastrointestinal function following esophagectomy for malignancy. Am J Surg 169:471–475PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Benefits Versus Risks: A Prospective Audit
Feeding Jejunostomy During Esophagectomy
Author
Vikas Gupta
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0019-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

World Journal of Surgery 7/2009 Go to the issue

Letter

Reply